ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Software > Operating Systems

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-28-2007, 04:23 PM   #11 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vista the best place to live :D
Age: 15
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MatrixEVO View Post
I want to switch to Vista, since my new system will be high-end and my video card is DX10 native. If Microsoft would allow DX10 to be used on XP, then I would not switch.

Also, alot of people are saying Vista is like ME, I don't think this is true. When Windows ME came out, it immediately seemed to be a short term OS, especially because ME stood for "Millenium Edition", and there was already alot of talk about XP when ME was released. ME only lasted for about a year. I think Vista is going to last a while longer, but maybe not as long as XP. I just think that XP is getting very old, it's 6 already! It was definitely time for an upgrade.
yea IMO its the mac people and the people that can't run vista on their pcs that are saying that

and I'm not trying to start a flame war
Jabes is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 11-28-2007, 09:06 PM   #12 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hereford PA
Age: 27
Posts: 602
Default

erm...lol
Quote:
The tests, run on a Dell XPS M1710 test bed with a 2GHz Core 2 Duo CPU and 1GB of RAM
well, that part i bolded explains exactly WHY it ran slower for them.

whenever anybody has problems with something i know about, i first look at there specs.
something i have noticed among vista users/triers is that:
nearly all of the people who complain about it being slow or have other trouble have less then 2gb of ram.
nearly all of the people who have no trouble with it have more then 2gb of ram.

so...its pretty obvious to me that ram is the main issue with people not being able to run vista nicely.

vista uses more ram then xp. so of course it will run noticeably slower then xp on a computer with only 1 gb of ram. thats why its easily possible to upgrade computers. besides that, EVERY OS ran slower then the previous one when put on hardware made for the previous one.
ie, vista runs slower then xp on the hardware that was made for xp
xp ran slower then 98 on hardware that was made for 98
98 ran slower then 95 on hardware that was made for 95
95 ran slower on hardware that was made for 3.1

each os released needs more ram and hard drive space then the previous OS and thus ran slower on hardware that was fine for the previous os.
__________________
The Universal - the internet's most unique and enjoyable game.
Mobo: Asus P5N32-E | CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @2.4GHz | PSU: Coolmax 650watt
Case: Lian-Li PC-V2100plusII | OS: XP Professional - 64bit | Monitors: Dual 19" Hanns-G 2ms LCDs
HDs: 3x320gb, 3x500gb, 2x750GB | Disc Drives: 16x DL dvd +/- rw
Ram: 6 gb ddr2 | GPU: 640MB GeForce 8800GTS
zaroba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 01:47 AM   #13 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vista the best place to live :D
Age: 15
Posts: 1,773
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaroba View Post
erm...lol

well, that part i bolded explains exactly WHY it ran slower for them.

whenever anybody has problems with something i know about, i first look at there specs.
something i have noticed among vista users/triers is that:
nearly all of the people who complain about it being slow or have other trouble have less then 2gb of ram.
nearly all of the people who have no trouble with it have more then 2gb of ram.

so...its pretty obvious to me that ram is the main issue with people not being able to run vista nicely.

vista uses more ram then xp. so of course it will run noticeably slower then xp on a computer with only 1 gb of ram. thats why its easily possible to upgrade computers. besides that, EVERY OS ran slower then the previous one when put on hardware made for the previous one.
ie, vista runs slower then xp on the hardware that was made for xp
xp ran slower then 98 on hardware that was made for 98
98 ran slower then 95 on hardware that was made for 95
95 ran slower on hardware that was made for 3.1

each os released needs more ram and hard drive space then the previous OS and thus ran slower on hardware that was fine for the previous os.
well put
Jabes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 02:07 AM   #14 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
chrislo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lords Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
Age: 21
Posts: 245
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tobywuk View Post
Check this link out, From Cnet stating XP is faster.

I just went back to XP from Vista yesterday and Im finding it much better.

http://www.news.com/Windows-XP-outsh...3-6220201.html
The problem with Vista is it requires more from your system, if you have a slower system its going to be slow going. What has me worried is all the bugs I am hearing about. I hope by time I build my PC to replace this one the bugs have been fixed.
__________________
Computer Spec's: Dell Dimension XPS Gen 4

Windows XP MCE 2005 SP2 (TV Tuner Card)
Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.46GHz (2 CPUs HyperThreading)
3 GB's of Ram
2 80 GB Hard Drives
ATI RADEON X850 Platinum Edition 256 MB
SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio

One thing PC users can do that Mac users can't do...
chrislo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 02:58 AM   #15 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
hermeslyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 4,940
Default

Service pack 3 is supposed to speed up xp even more,

http://arstechnica.com/journals/micr...rivate-testers

pwned.

Edit: the test beta was also leaked, you can find it through a bittorrent tracker site, like mininova.

Last edited by hermeslyre; 11-29-2007 at 03:09 AM.
hermeslyre is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 11-29-2007, 04:19 AM   #16 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
chrislo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lords Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
Age: 21
Posts: 245
Default

Whats the ETA for SP3?
__________________
Computer Spec's: Dell Dimension XPS Gen 4

Windows XP MCE 2005 SP2 (TV Tuner Card)
Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.46GHz (2 CPUs HyperThreading)
3 GB's of Ram
2 80 GB Hard Drives
ATI RADEON X850 Platinum Edition 256 MB
SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio

One thing PC users can do that Mac users can't do...
chrislo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 04:23 AM   #17 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
hermeslyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 4,940
Default

I thinks.... first half of '08. that's right, says so in the link. ;P Couple months away, It might actually be worth it to pick up that beta, 15,000 other people are currently testing it.. think of it as.. a unconfirmed testing, lol. Anyways, i haven't made up my mind yet.
hermeslyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 04:29 AM   #18 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
chrislo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lords Valley, Pennsylvania, USA
Age: 21
Posts: 245
Default

I am shocked Microsoft is coming out with SP3, I expected them to drop XP like they did with the Xbox.
__________________
Computer Spec's: Dell Dimension XPS Gen 4

Windows XP MCE 2005 SP2 (TV Tuner Card)
Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.46GHz (2 CPUs HyperThreading)
3 GB's of Ram
2 80 GB Hard Drives
ATI RADEON X850 Platinum Edition 256 MB
SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio

One thing PC users can do that Mac users can't do...
chrislo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 04:38 AM   #19 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
patrickv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Soul Chamber
Posts: 5,381
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabes View Post
yea IMO its the mac people and the people that can't run vista on their pcs that are saying that

and I'm not trying to start a flame war
jabes stop being an a**, now you really pissed me off, it ain't Mac users at all, get your mind right damn it
of course you are doing a war you just don't realize what you said, you don't realize that such comments (such as your sig also) pisses off people.
sorry to be so mean dude but you deserved it
__________________
Laptop: Thinkpad X60: Core2Duo T7200 @ 2Ghz,1GB DDR2,110GB SATA -winXP ProSP2
Work Desktop: Core Duo E2180 @ 2Ghz,1.5GB DDR2,240GB HD - XP PRO SP2
Home: Core Duo E2180 2Ghz,1.5GB DDR2,Nvidia GForce 6200TB,320 GB (2x160GB) -Dual boot - XP / OSX 10.5.2
patrickv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 04:39 AM   #20 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
hermeslyre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 4,940
Default

Well if they dropped XP they'd look even more like an arrogant monopolized standard, damaging their image too much, possibly. Most people still use XP, and dropping all support would result in a bevy of unpatched security holes and that sort of thing. I think they should drop Vista, personally.
hermeslyre is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
which windows vista package to get robina_80 Operating Systems 39 03-17-2008 02:39 AM
[urgent]Help! Vista Aero malfunctioned after installed XP! aleyshark Operating Systems 2 11-17-2007 08:00 PM
Windows Vista Compatible Incompatible Hardware Guide jimmayor007 Video Cards and Monitors 0 09-01-2007 07:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum