IDE Ultra ATE100 or SATA 3.0Gb/s

JohnJSal · 12-08-2007, 05:08 AM

What's the difference between these two? I see a choice between two Seagate Barracuda 160GB HDs, and this is the only difference. The specs seem to match. Is one better?

Thanks.

[-0MEGA-] · 12-08-2007, 05:39 AM

They are two different interfaces, which are not compatible with each other. If you have a SATA port, I would highly recommend it as the bandwidth is much greater and you don't have to deal with slow downs with multiple devices on the same cable, or setting master and slave jumpers.

JohnJSal · 12-08-2007, 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-]

They are two different interfaces, which are not compatible with each other. If you have a SATA port, I would highly recommend it as the bandwidth is much greater and you don't have to deal with slow downs with multiple devices on the same cable, or setting master and slave jumpers.

Thanks! I'm guessing this would plug into the SATA connector on the mobo then?

StrangleHold · 12-08-2007, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnJSal

Thanks! I'm guessing this would plug into the SATA connector on the mobo then?

Yes

imsati · 12-08-2007, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-]

They are two different interfaces, which are not compatible with each other. If you have a SATA port, I would highly recommend it as the bandwidth is much greater and you don't have to deal with slow downs with multiple devices on the same cable, or setting master and slave jumpers.

Agreed. This is one of the few times I'll promote the better technology as being good for everyone, regardless of what they use their system for. SATA is currently in two forms: SATA 1.5 GB/sec and SATAII 3.0 GB/sec. Be forewarned that current limitations means that your 3.0 GB/sec won't transfer data at that speed (yet), but is faster than both IDE and SATA 1.5. We are rapidly approaching the day when the full transfer rate will be reached though, and SATAII won't be 'obsolete' in 4 months like some current CPU's, so just go for SATA

JohnJSal · 12-08-2007, 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imsati

Agreed. This is one of the few times I'll promote the better technology as being good for everyone, regardless of what they use their system for. SATA is currently in two forms: SATA 1.5 GB/sec and SATAII 3.0 GB/sec. Be forewarned that current limitations means that your 3.0 GB/sec won't transfer data at that speed (yet), but is faster than both IDE and SATA 1.5. We are rapidly approaching the day when the full transfer rate will be reached though, and SATAII won't be 'obsolete' in 4 months like some current CPU's, so just go for SATA

Thanks! That's good stuff to know.

lanpartiercarter · 12-09-2007, 08:35 AM

sata 2

12-08-2007, 05:08 AM	#1 (permalink)
JohnJSal Platinum Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Hoboken, NJ Age: 28 Posts: 527	IDE Ultra ATE100 or SATA 3.0Gb/s What's the difference between these two? I see a choice between two Seagate Barracuda 160GB HDs, and this is the only difference. The specs seem to match. Is one better? Thanks.

12-08-2007, 05:39 AM	#2 (permalink)
[-0MEGA-] Diamond Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Concord, NH Age: 19 Posts: 27,069	They are two different interfaces, which are not compatible with each other. If you have a SATA port, I would highly recommend it as the bandwidth is much greater and you don't have to deal with slow downs with multiple devices on the same cable, or setting master and slave jumpers. __________________ Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179

12-09-2007, 08:35 AM	#7 (permalink)
lanpartiercarter Silver Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Kingsley Michiigan Age: 16 Posts: 139	sata 2 __________________ celeron d 3.33ghz ati radeon x1300pro 2gbs of 5300 at 667mhz 120 gb sata2 hardrive old crt monitor dual layer dvd burner single layer x16 dvd burner

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
WinXP boot up failure from SATA + IDE disk combo	SSj4_Dthscythe	Operating Systems	4	07-29-2006 11:39 AM
Can I boot from a slaved IDE with a primary Sata?	asdfguy	Computer Memory and Hard Drives	2	04-15-2006 09:36 PM
Another IDE vs. SATA Question...	aramp1	Computer Memory and Hard Drives	4	04-27-2005 11:47 PM