ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Software > Operating Systems

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-08-2007, 11:22 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
alienationware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 381
Default Why I went back to Windows After Having Got to Know Linux

I played around with Ubuntu for a few days... Learnt a few nifty things... The Synaptic Manager thingy impressed me the most. But I got rid of Linux for good, and now, I'm back to WindowsXP again.

For the home/office user, Windows is alot more productive and fun. I recall spending hours just figuring how to get certain things to work under Linux, whereas in Windows, it's a simple little Google search and the problem is fixed within minutes.

My biggest complain about Linux: After hearing some of my favorite songs on high quality speakers on both (1) Linux and (2) Windows XP with SRS Audio Sandbox, there's no way in hell I'll work under Linux while hearing the crap noise that is pretending to be music being output in the background. And sure, Totem media player's visualizations are a lot prettier than WMP11, but com'on, there's no taskbar toolbar for it? And besides WMP11 is a lot more intuitive to use, especially when you have multiple playlists and want to switch rapidly between them without having to manually locate your other playlists like in Linux.

Sure, WinXP may look as ugly as hell, even with the Zune or Royale/Media Center theme, but it's functionality is not duplicated in Linux. And sure, Windows may be the damn capitalistic OS that it is, but without generating revenue, cool things like SRS Audio Sandbox, etc. will never come existence, much less the some-what cool New Aurora desktop background from Vista, which I suspect they hired some Ph.D. of psychology or mathematician to come up with because the image sure plays tricks on the eyes and looks like it's damn hell moving when it's not.

Also, the same programs that I've come to enjoy simply work differently (and often dumberly) under linux. Example, if you play a song in the background, you can't listen to sounds coming from your VMWare VM, because only one program can output sound on Linux at anyone time. Whereas in Windows, this is not the case. Another program with the WTF factor is Snes9x. Sure, the Linux version runs faster than the Windows version, but that's it. It's usability in Linux is pure crap, especially when you want to save multiple states and resume them quickly.

Maybe I'll consider giving Linux another try again a few years down the road if I can do the same things in Linux as on Windows (example, no way in hell you can compare OpenOffice with Office 2007 in terms of functionality and productivity).

And for people who dual boot Linux and Windows XP, I don't understand you. Why switch back and forth between them to do certain tasks if you can do everything on 1 OS, and then some? That's enough of my ranting for now...
alienationware is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-08-2007, 11:29 PM   #2 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PabloTeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Peoples Republic of Nae Butta!
Age: 17
Posts: 2,204
Default

Why dual-boot? Well some of us like to use different operating systems because they may do X task better that OS Y. Also it's partly the geek value.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.8GHz | Gigabyte EP43-DS3L | GeIL 3GB PC2-6400 | BFG GeForce 8800GT 512MB OC | Seagate 500GB 7200.11 SATA | Western Digital 250GB SE16 SATA | Coolermaster CM690 | Corsair HX520W
PabloTeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2007, 11:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
alienationware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
Why dual-boot? Well some of us like to use different operating systems because they may do X task better that OS Y. Also it's partly the geek value.
Then you guys are no different from the anime otakus that women so despise and devalue in Japan...
alienationware is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2007, 11:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
GameMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Croatia
Age: 16
Posts: 3,699
Default

Jesus...hey it's all about the reason. Why would you need Linux? To hack and do programs. Why would you use Windows? To have fun and experiment.
So the conclusion is...Linux is only for experts
__________________
dznutz:
Quote:
a firewall is like a gate. it keeps the bad people out and the dog in but it's not fool proof. but lets say you download and run an infected program. that will be like letting in a "friend." if it's infected you run that program you can get malware. that's like a friend raping your family and stealing your money.
GameMaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 12:11 AM   #5 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PabloTeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Peoples Republic of Nae Butta!
Age: 17
Posts: 2,204
Default

I use Linux because I like to have a mess around and try new things. It also makes installing things easier once you've used bash as you know your way around.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.8GHz | Gigabyte EP43-DS3L | GeIL 3GB PC2-6400 | BFG GeForce 8800GT 512MB OC | Seagate 500GB 7200.11 SATA | Western Digital 250GB SE16 SATA | Coolermaster CM690 | Corsair HX520W
PabloTeK is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-09-2007, 12:20 AM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
imsati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: EHT, NJ
Posts: 2,415
Default

With all due respect, "I played around with Ubuntu for a few days" *hardly* warrants 'knowing' Linux.

For the sound, it seems like you don't have correct packages installed. My music actually sounds better coming from it than it does XP. For everything else, re-read my first sentence...

Don't blame the OS if *you* don't want to dedicate the time it takes to learn it. It's a shame really, you could have had so much fun with so many things if you'd simply given yourself a few weeks to understand *how* Linux works rather than gripe about *why* you need to learn how to use it.

<sniff> I smell smoke...is there a Flame coming...?
__________________
--Jay
Gigabyte EP31-DS3L | E4500 | Masscool HSF paired with AS-5
80 GB SATA2 x 2 | e-GeForce 7100 GS | CM Elite 330 (gorgeous!)
Triple Boot: Ubuntu 7.10/XP Home/Kubuntu 7.10

Also, I can kill you with my brain.

The Great Forum Challenge
http://www.computerforum.com/114761-...tml#post922619
(And you follow his advice why, exactly...?) (Funny Thread though!)
imsati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 01:07 AM   #7 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alienationware View Post
I played around with Ubuntu for a few days... Learnt a few nifty things... The Synaptic Manager thingy impressed me the most. But I got rid of Linux for good, and now, I'm back to WindowsXP again.

For the home/office user, Windows is alot more productive and fun. I recall spending hours just figuring how to get certain things to work under Linux, whereas in Windows, it's a simple little Google search and the problem is fixed within minutes.

My biggest complain about Linux: After hearing some of my favorite songs on high quality speakers on both (1) Linux and (2) Windows XP with SRS Audio Sandbox, there's no way in hell I'll work under Linux while hearing the crap noise that is pretending to be music being output in the background. And sure, Totem media player's visualizations are a lot prettier than WMP11, but com'on, there's no taskbar toolbar for it? And besides WMP11 is a lot more intuitive to use, especially when you have multiple playlists and want to switch rapidly between them without having to manually locate your other playlists like in Linux.
Yes and the apt command line package manager is also very impressive when installing software. I suspect your audio files are probably poor in quality and downloaded from some crappy P2P application like Limewire. I use Linux for ripping audio/video a lot more than I do in windows. With FLAC and OGG, I get highly compressed lossless audio. I have a logictec 5 piece surround sound system, which is not the greatest, but it is very good for the price. I don't necessarily consider myself an audiophile, but I do collect a lot of music and I still think vinyl sounds better than digital.

Also, WMP, is bloated, resource hungry and a huge security risk. Just google search all the viruses and malware you get from installing bad codecs.


Quote:
Sure, WinXP may look as ugly as hell, even with the Zune or Royale/Media Center theme, but it's functionality is not duplicated in Linux. And sure, Windows may be the damn capitalistic OS that it is, but without generating revenue, cool things like SRS Audio Sandbox, etc. will never come existence, much less the some-what cool New Aurora desktop background from Vista, which I suspect they hired some Ph.D. of psychology or mathematician to come up with because the image sure plays tricks on the eyes and looks like it's damn hell moving when it's not.
Did you know that open source software is a 500 million dollar per a year business? Its not like these open source developers aren't making money, their business model is different than that of Microsoft's or Apple's, or SUN, or any other giant technology company.

Quote:
Also, the same programs that I've come to enjoy simply work differently (and often dumberly) under linux. Example, if you play a song in the background, you can't listen to sounds coming from your VMWare VM, because only one program can output sound on Linux at anyone time. Whereas in Windows, this is not the case. Another program with the WTF factor is Snes9x. Sure, the Linux version runs faster than the Windows version, but that's it. It's usability in Linux is pure crap, especially when you want to save multiple states and resume them quickly.
The problem here is not Linux. It is the manufacturer of your sound card. They do not produce specs or source code for their product. So, Linux has to use a generic driver which lacks features of your sound card. This is very common in Linux, and its not the OS's fault. It is the manufacturer's fault for not supporting it. Now, this may make or break the deal with you, but other users it may not.

Quote:
Maybe I'll consider giving Linux another try again a few years down the road if I can do the same things in Linux as on Windows (example, no way in hell you can compare OpenOffice with Office 2007 in terms of functionality and productivity).

And for people who dual boot Linux and Windows XP, I don't understand you. Why switch back and forth between them to do certain tasks if you can do everything on 1 OS, and then some? That's enough of my ranting for now...
This is far from fact, and is your personal opinion. Sure, you are totally entitled to it, but using Linux for a few days to a week does not constitute a valid review of Linux. First of all, there are 100s of distributions out there, ubuntu was not for you. So, try suse, mandrake, fedora, PCLinux, puppy, knoppix, debian, redhat, or try some form of Unix like free BSD.

I agree with you that Open Office is not a fair comparison to MS office, because MS office does actually perform better, but what openoffice does, for what you pay (free) is a damn good program.

I think windows is not very productive. I find myself most productive on a Mac, they are designed for simplicity and efficiency. I can get 5 hours of work done on a Mac in about 2 hours. I do it every day. Friday, I recon'd a whole lab of computers into inventory, finished up building a file server (ubuntu actually, RAID 5, dual xeons, 2.5gig of RAM) for the graphic design department, created 4 deployable software images for network installment, Created a deployable CS 3 Design Premium installer for the graphic design department. Created several new network policies for the client machines to help with internet traffic and filtering. Pushed out an update on assessment testing to several computers. I also reimaged a few machines. This was all possible because of the simple and efficient way of how Macs are designed. This is my opinion, not everyone would have the same results as me.

I suggest if you really want to learn Linux, take at least a month of tinkering with it. You can't expect it to just do everything out of the box with out learning how to use it. However, do not expect it to be like or compare it to windows while you use it. It is nothing like windows at all. If you still want to use windows after a full month, then you will know Linux is not for you. It is not for everyone.

Last edited by tlarkin; 12-09-2007 at 01:09 AM.
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 01:43 AM   #8 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
alienationware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 381
Default

Quote:
With FLAC and OGG, I get highly compressed lossless audio. I have a logictec 5 piece surround sound system, which is not the greatest, but it is very good for the price. I don't necessarily consider myself an audiophile, but I do collect a lot of music and I still think vinyl sounds better than digital.
I'm too lazy to read the rest of your long post... But haha! Lol, Logitec...

I'm talking about playing audio thru the Creative/Gigaworks T20 2.0 speaker system, which by the way beats most entry level 5.1 Altec Lansing speakers hands down, let alone Logitec speakers. This baby is so awesome that there is no audible distortion when no sound is playing (See CNET reviews for details)...

And obviously, you haven't played around with SRS Audio Sandbox, which artificially adds back the missing elements in the music so that, say, the sound of a piano key degraded thru compression will sound just like the original when passed thru SRS Audio Sandbox. And yes, even on my high quality speakers, there is a ginormous difference between the audio quality played on Linux without SRS and on Windows with it... And yeah, even with lossless audio files, they can benefit from SRS with Circle Surround and bass boost, etc.
alienationware is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 01:49 AM   #9 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,821
Default

Nope, I run my audio into a receiver and use these awesome retro cerwin vega speakers I got from my parents. Computer audio will never lay a hand on actual audio equipment, but it may sometime down the road. When everything is integrated into a computer. But I hear ya, sounds like a nice audio rig.

But again, it is not Linux's fault. It is creative for not writing decent Linux software/drivers for supporting their product. So, of course it won't work that well on Linux. Do you think Creative wants to release specs or their source code? I think that more companies should, then you would see their product being bought for all the Linux users. In fact, ATI just did this, they are releasing source now to the open source community. So maybe now other companies will follow. They are just scared that their product will get hacked and they will lose revenue.
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2007, 05:16 AM   #10 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
brycematheson712's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: C:\Windows\System32\
Posts: 184
Default

Using Ubuntu for a few days is hardly enough to give is a proper review and say that you know it. I've been using Ubuntu for 6-7 months and I'm still FAR FAR away from saying that I know all of it's features (I really want to learn more about the terminal).

As far as productivity goes, of course you're going to be more comfortable with Windows. Every person has grown up with Windows in some way, shape, or form. Really, it's sick, actually. If you were to grow up with Linux from the start you would feel that rifling through the internet for software would be the most ridiculous thing you'd ever heard. I can understand what you mean about spending hours trying to get a simple task going that could have been done in Windows in minutes; that's half the fun. Once you learn though, you understand what the purpose was though, and you'll never have that problem ever again.

Someone above me already told you that it was the hardware part of your sound card and not Linux itself. My sound is great and has never had such a crisp sound before under Linux. I really prefer Rhythmbox to iTunes or WMP. It can handle iPod transfers and much more. Plus, the system resources are EXTREMELY minimal whereas iTunes causes your system to hack up a lung just to be used. Another thing I really enjoy about music on Linux are the keyboard shortcuts. I can be in a completely different window and the keyboard shortcuts take precedence over any program I am in which is GREAT. I hate having to open iTunes, or go down to the taskbar just to click 'Next' to skip a song when I could just press '6' on my keypad to skip it. It's great.

Appearance? Linux can be skinned just as much, if not more (and better) than Windows. If you like the look of Windows, skin Linux to look like it. Or, if you want to be original, go find some other random one off the internet. Simple. I've got mine in a black/orange theme I really enjoy.

I must admit that having the sound coming from only one program was annoying for me as well. After a simple Google search, however, I found a simple fix. Just download a simple program/plugin called 'jackd'. It will allow sound channels to flow from all open programs and not just the current one you're viewing.

For me, it was hard to switch from Windows to Linux. At first, I had a computer that couldn't run anything else and so I was sort of 'forced' to run Ubuntu. I'm totally grateful for it now. And then, for the little tiny things I can't do in Linux 'yet' I run a VMware Window of XP. For example, I haven't gotten CS3 to run in WINE yet, but I'm not giving up yet.

Anyway, I guess the point of this entire post is just to stick with it. One day isn't long enough at all to judge anything. Stick with it for months, google your problems, or go to Ubuntuforum.org and they'll help you with tons of your problems!

Good luck.
brycematheson712 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compaq mother board again exopforce Motherboards 15 09-29-2006 01:05 AM
Linux or Windows FTP Server? - Plus Connection Sharing! Bootup05 Computer Networking and Servers 2 09-03-2006 10:13 PM
Critical Updates!!! PaulAnthony2233 Computer Security 11 04-05-2006 04:16 AM
hijackthis log| HELP dorkins Computer Security 11 11-07-2005 02:06 AM
HELP ME! I tried to install Linux, now windows does not boot correctly Holiday Operating Systems 10 08-29-2005 09:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum