|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: portland, oregon
Age: 17
Posts: 1,004
|
I'm in the market now, and I'm considering all of the above. I will be using them at 1680x1050 so I want to know how they will fare. How will the above do gaming at this resolution, and how do they compare?
__________________
MB: Gigabyte P35-DS3L CPU: Core 2 Duo E6550 @3.5hz GPU: PNY GeForce 8800 GT 512 RAM: 4GBs DDR2-800 (Ballistix and OCZ SLI) CL4 PSU: Antec NeoPower 650W Case: Antec 900 HDD: Seagate SATA 250GB, 16MB cache Seagate SATA 320GB, 16MB cache |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 4,973
|
The 256mb 8800gt would be the best overall performer from that list.. then the 3870, 3850, etc. 256mb of VRAM is really showing it's age however, and the resolution you're planning on gaming on will be a bit too much for this version. You'll see the low VRAM bottlenecking the GPU in certain games.. Keep an eye out for deals on the 512MB version, or maybe even a 512Mb version of the 3870, the extra RAM is becoming a must.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: portland, oregon
Age: 17
Posts: 1,004
|
So 8800GT would be better than a 3870 (BTW, all 3870's are 512MB), even at this resolution? And would there be a considerable difference between the 3850 512 and the 8800 256?
__________________
MB: Gigabyte P35-DS3L CPU: Core 2 Duo E6550 @3.5hz GPU: PNY GeForce 8800 GT 512 RAM: 4GBs DDR2-800 (Ballistix and OCZ SLI) CL4 PSU: Antec NeoPower 650W Case: Antec 900 HDD: Seagate SATA 250GB, 16MB cache Seagate SATA 320GB, 16MB cache |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: California
Age: 15
Posts: 3,824
|
i think the 3870 would be better because of its Vram, but thats just me
__________________
E4500 @ 2.93GHZ ASUS P5K-DELUXE 2GB OCZ Reaper CL3 @ 800MHZ 3-4-4-15 eVGA 8800GT OZC GameXStream 700W PSU 320GB WD Caviar SATA, 80GB WD Caviar IDE Sometimes scientists make things alot harder than they need to. All they've gotta do is put a big spring on the ground where they think it's gonna land, or send a mission to the moon to erect a sign that says "Welcome to Earth". |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Peoples Republic of Nae Butta!
Age: 17
Posts: 2,356
|
If it was the 512MB 8800GT then it would beat all of those cards; although we are on about the 256MB version which will struggle.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.8GHz | Gigabyte EP43-DS3L | GeIL 3GB PC2-6400 | BFG GeForce 8800GT 512MB OC | Seagate 500GB 7200.11 SATA | Western Digital 250GB SE16 SATA | Coolermaster CM690 | Corsair HX520W
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ @ 2.4GHz | 2GB Samsung PC2-5300 | LeadTek 7300GS 256MB | Western Digital 80GB SATA |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ashland, Oregon
Age: 17
Posts: 1,179
|
I want to go with the 3870 because it supposedly renders better than the 8800GT, only gets a few FPS less, and takes up 2 slots instead of 1 (which I see as an advantage, because it's better cooling and looks like it is pretty hefty.)
__________________
!=============>Current Rig<===============! !=====>E8400 at Stock Zalman 9700LED<=====! !==>GIGABYTE P35 DS3L = Diamond HD 3870<==! !=>4GB G.SKILL DDR2 800 - Antec 900 Case<=! !=>WD 7200RPM 320GB HD = Corsair HX520W <=! Contests Won: [Poem Contest - Kornowksi] [xFire Logo Contest] Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
VIP - Graphics Guru
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool, UK
Age: 18
Posts: 12,787
|
I'd go for the 8800GT, It's just as good as it's 512MB brother at the lower res.
Paul, you got your GT yet?
__________________
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
EVGA 750i SLI FTW 4GB Crucial Ballistix @ 800MHz 2 X 8800GTS G92 in SLI Corsair HX520W Windows Vista Home Premium Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7200.11 SATA II Tuniq Tower LED OCZ XTC RAM Cooler Antec 900 (Modded) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,310
|
Quote:
Bios wont let me go above 860, you can flash it to a new unlocked bios if you want extreme...
__________________
CPU: C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz 1.24v HSF: Apogee GTX MB: Gigabyte X38-DS4 Ram: 2x2GB G. Skill DDR2-1068 HDD: 320GB Seagate PSU: OCZ GameXStream 700w OS: Vista Home Premium 64bit GFX: 2x HD4850 Crossfire LCD: LG 22" L226WTQ 3DMark06: 20826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 18
Posts: 4,973
|
Hmm..
http://en.expreview.com/?p=64&page=7 VS. http://www.legitreviews.com/article/607/9/ Two very different stories! I wish Anandtech would create some benchies, those I can trust. Anyways, yeah, I'm gonna go with the 3780 (thanks for the tip, Oregon)! Erm, yeah I switched.. Hey, look at that over there! *runs away* |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,598
|
Anandtech make more reliable review
Here is benchmarks for 8800GT 256MB compared to HD3850 and HD3870 http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3175&p=6 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 8800GT or HD 3870 | tuxify | Video Cards and Monitors | 23 | 12-11-2007 09:29 PM |
| for the price is the 8800GT better than the 8800GTS 512mb | XxIlluminatorxX | Video Cards and Monitors | 6 | 12-11-2007 08:30 PM |
| 8800GT 256MB review | maroon1 | Video Cards and Monitors | 6 | 11-20-2007 03:09 AM |
| EVGA e-GeForce 8800GT KO 512MB VS EVGA e-GeForce 8800 GTS Super Super Clocked 640MB?? | DSM1999 | Video Cards and Monitors | 7 | 11-17-2007 10:55 PM |