|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 310
|
If you don't upgrade your system every 6 months, get a quad.
__________________
CPU: C2D e8400 @ 3.6 HSF: Arctic Freezer 7 MOBO: Gigabyte P35-DS3L RAM: 4GB Corsair XMS2 GPU: XFX GeForce G92 8800 GTS HDD: WD Raptor 150GB PSU: OCZ GameXStream 700W CASE: Antech 900 OS: Win XP x64 MON: Samsung 932BW All this for CS:S? Why not :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California for now
Age: 19
Posts: 71
|
if people are still using single core processors today, years after the p4 got up to 3.0ghz, and not having major problems, and are still even able to run the high majority of applications without a hitch... what's to stop you from *not* upgrading every 6 months without problems? sure, the duo to quad core leap came fast... but look at how long it took for single to duo. and even now with the dual core out for a few years, applications are just now starting to take advantage of it. I belive a duo is still viable and the quad is more of a server/business rendering processor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: hypercube
Posts: 112
|
It just depends, both arguments are good. However, for me, i would go dual. By the time you would see a majority of app/games taking advantage of multithreading well, you prob would upgrade to a faster quad anyhow!
__________________
Politics is supposed to be the second oldest profession. I have come to realize that it bears a very close resemblance to the first. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: University of Delaware
Age: 21
Posts: 1,315
|
Where do you get your 3DMark06 rating?
The CPU should no have increased your 3D mark. This is weird. I guess your videocard was bottle necked with the previous CPU.
__________________
Can't wait to finish college and build my system. |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: sheboygan, wi
Posts: 424
|
i would have got the e8400, i hear great things so far
__________________
case- antec 900 Dell d840 cpu-intel e8400 @3.00ghz p4 2.0ghz memory- 4gb corsair 800 mhz 512 mb ram hdd- 500 gb western digital psu- 700 ocz video- evga 8800gt speakers- logitech 5.1 X130 dvd- lite on 20x os-vista home premium if anybody has any input on the left column thats what i want to get right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,170
|
q6600 not major differnce between 2.4 and 3.0 and i got this q6600 to 3.6ghz
__________________
q6600-3.6ghz evga 680i a1 2gig ddr2-800 ocz sli memory pny 8800gts oced swiftech h20-120 water cooling 500gb caviar 7200rpm 3.0gb/s ocz 700watt game stream psu Vista Home Premium 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 43
|
Download and install:
http://www.majorgeeks.com/3DMark06_d4935.html At the end there's a button to see your rating online. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E6850 3.0 Ghz reading 2.0 Ghz | SgtBobert | CPUs and Overclocking | 8 | 01-06-2008 06:59 PM |
| Core 2 Duo 2.66, 3.0 or Quad 2.4? | The Jackyl | Laptop and Smartphones | 9 | 01-03-2008 08:51 PM |
| Intel Duo Core 2 vs Intel Duo Core Quad | millertime85 | Desktop Computers | 20 | 12-29-2007 02:34 PM |
| Intel core 2 Extreme vs Duo vs Quad | nameIess | CPUs and Overclocking | 11 | 07-09-2007 08:27 AM |
| Comparing Core 2 Duo vs. xeon quad core e5310 1.6ghz | remember | CPUs and Overclocking | 12 | 12-17-2006 05:50 AM |