|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which OS would you go with | |||
| Linux |
|
9 | 15.52% |
| Vista |
|
27 | 46.55% |
| XP |
|
22 | 37.93% |
| Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chatham, New York
Age: 17
Posts: 933
|
it depends on how powerful the machine youre running is...though i prefer XP, for certain reasons i cannot discuss here
![]()
__________________
E4500 @ 2.2GHz
Acer AL2216W @ 1680x1050 Gigabyte P35-DS3L 2048MB OCZ DDR2-800 80GB Excelstor SATA 3.0 MSI HD2600XT (256MB GDDR4) NEC DVD-R-DL |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 165
|
vista ultimate...... having the power to do everything.....and having a os to last longer in the future then xp...
__________________
http://www.speedtest.net/result/210510915.png |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,821
|
Another contrived opinion about Vista. The only differences between Vista Home Premium and Vista Ultimate will not affect the home user at all. Ultimate offers encrypted file system support (I hope no home user ever uses this). Built in faxing software - easily fixed by buying third party, the ability to connect to domain level networks - again more feature limiting on MS's part but no home user needs to connect to a domain controller, and I think remote desktop. Oh darn, go download VNC its free, there is your remote desktop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Moderator - F@H Guru
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Cali
Age: 28
Posts: 3,434
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Q9450 @ 2.66 GHz || Zalman CNPS9700 ASUS Rampage Formula 320MB 8800 GTS (G80) 4GB Ballistix Tracer @ 1068 MHz 2X 150GB WD Raptors (RAID 0) 1TB Hitachi Deskstar Antec Nine Hundred Case 750W Quad Silencer FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND:F@H Team 44358 || Team Stats || My Stats || Hardware Contributions: Q9450/PS3/P4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
VIP - Graphics Guru
![]() Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool, UK
Age: 18
Posts: 11,265
|
I've got Dreamscene on Home Premium
![]() All this stuff you here about Vista being full of bugs and hard to run... it just isn't... At all! I've also found it to be well faster than XP too... but just my opinion!
__________________
Currently Broked Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.8GHz Gigabyte GA-965P-S3 - Rev 3.3 4GB Crucial Ballistix @ 800MHz PNY 8800GTS G92 @ 800/2000/1000 Corsair HX520W Windows Vista Home Premium Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7200.11 SATA II Tuniq Tower LED OCZ XTC RAM Cooler Antec 900 (Modded) |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Moderator - F@H Guru
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Cali
Age: 28
Posts: 3,434
|
Oh, I thought that was limited to Ultimate.
I'm havin' problems installing Ultimate x64. Other than that, I'm pretty happy with Vista. ![]()
__________________
Q9450 @ 2.66 GHz || Zalman CNPS9700 ASUS Rampage Formula 320MB 8800 GTS (G80) 4GB Ballistix Tracer @ 1068 MHz 2X 150GB WD Raptors (RAID 0) 1TB Hitachi Deskstar Antec Nine Hundred Case 750W Quad Silencer FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND:F@H Team 44358 || Team Stats || My Stats || Hardware Contributions: Q9450/PS3/P4 |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) | |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,821
|
Quote:
Wacom tablets, 1.5 years old, not compatible with vista Novell client (could be better now) although it worked, not with out its caveats. Several printers don't work w/ 64bit that we had at my work several needed applications won't work unless you upgrade, cost of upgrading was thousands and thousands in licenses. Not worth upgrading at this point. networking - tons of issues and of course the giant increase of hardware resources used. Vista does not out perform XP though, and even if you dig through benchmarks you will find them neck and neck or XP beating vista. It just gives you the illusion by preloading applications into memory. Loading time may be a bit faster but actual performance while using an application is identical. Which is why its not worth the several hundred dollars to upgrade IMO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) | ||
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 17
Posts: 821
|
Quote:
Athlon XP 3000+ 1GB RAM 80GB HDD Radeon 9250 Windows Experience Index = 1.0 Quote:
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66GHz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz RAM : 8GB DDR2-800 PC6400 A-DATA / 2GB DDR2-667 PC5300 A-DATA HDD : Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 750GB SATA/ Hitatchi Travelstar 120GB 5400RPM GPU :Sapphire Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB OS : Windows Vista Ultimate / Windows Vista Home Premium Last edited by Garethman!!`; 01-24-2008 at 07:52 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 17
Posts: 821
|
Here is the link to the tests I did where I proved Vista beats XP on the lowest of the lowest PCs you would consider running Vista on
http://forums.pureoverclock.com/showthread.php?t=2166
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66GHz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz RAM : 8GB DDR2-800 PC6400 A-DATA / 2GB DDR2-667 PC5300 A-DATA HDD : Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 750GB SATA/ Hitatchi Travelstar 120GB 5400RPM GPU :Sapphire Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB OS : Windows Vista Ultimate / Windows Vista Home Premium |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|