ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Software > Operating Systems

View Poll Results: Which OS would you go with
Linux 9 15.52%
Vista 27 46.55%
XP 22 37.93%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2008, 06:21 PM   #41 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
jimkonow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chatham, New York
Age: 17
Posts: 933
Default

it depends on how powerful the machine youre running is...though i prefer XP, for certain reasons i cannot discuss here
__________________
E4500 @ 2.2GHz
Acer AL2216W @ 1680x1050
Gigabyte P35-DS3L
2048MB OCZ DDR2-800
80GB Excelstor SATA 3.0
MSI HD2600XT (256MB GDDR4)
NEC DVD-R-DL
jimkonow is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-24-2008, 06:51 PM   #42 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 165
Default

vista ultimate...... having the power to do everything.....and having a os to last longer in the future then xp...
shawn_selig29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 06:57 PM   #43 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shawn_selig29 View Post
vista ultimate...... having the power to do everything.....and having a os to last longer in the future then xp...
Another contrived opinion about Vista. The only differences between Vista Home Premium and Vista Ultimate will not affect the home user at all. Ultimate offers encrypted file system support (I hope no home user ever uses this). Built in faxing software - easily fixed by buying third party, the ability to connect to domain level networks - again more feature limiting on MS's part but no home user needs to connect to a domain controller, and I think remote desktop. Oh darn, go download VNC its free, there is your remote desktop.
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 07:19 PM   #44 (permalink)
Moderator - F@H Guru
 
mep916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Cali
Age: 28
Posts: 3,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarkin View Post
Another contrived opinion about Vista. The only differences between Vista Home Premium and Vista Ultimate will not affect the home user at all. Ultimate offers encrypted file system support (I hope no home user ever uses this). Built in faxing software - easily fixed by buying third party, the ability to connect to domain level networks - again more feature limiting on MS's part but no home user needs to connect to a domain controller, and I think remote desktop. Oh darn, go download VNC its free, there is your remote desktop.
You forgot about Texas Hold 'em and Dreamscene.
__________________
Q9450 @ 2.66 GHz || Zalman CNPS9700
ASUS Rampage Formula
320MB 8800 GTS (G80)
4GB Ballistix Tracer @ 1068 MHz
2X 150GB WD Raptors (RAID 0)
1TB Hitachi Deskstar
Antec Nine Hundred Case
750W Quad Silencer

FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND:F@H Team 44358 || Team Stats || My Stats || Hardware Contributions: Q9450/PS3/P4
mep916 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 07:23 PM   #45 (permalink)
VIP - Graphics Guru
 
Kornowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Liverpool, UK
Age: 18
Posts: 11,265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mep916 View Post
You forgot about Texas Hold 'em and Dreamscene.
I've got Dreamscene on Home Premium

All this stuff you here about Vista being full of bugs and hard to run... it just isn't... At all!

I've also found it to be well faster than XP too... but just my opinion!
__________________
Currently Broked

Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.8GHz
Gigabyte GA-965P-S3 - Rev 3.3
4GB Crucial Ballistix @ 800MHz
PNY 8800GTS G92 @ 800/2000/1000
Corsair HX520W
Windows Vista Home Premium
Seagate Barracuda 500GB 7200.11 SATA II
Tuniq Tower LED
OCZ XTC RAM Cooler
Antec 900 (Modded)


Winner of Photo Tournament: People, Jewelry & Dead Space

Member of COD4 [CF] Clan: [CF] Kornowski
Kornowski is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-24-2008, 07:35 PM   #46 (permalink)
Moderator - F@H Guru
 
mep916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Northern Cali
Age: 28
Posts: 3,434
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
I've got Dreamscene on Home Premium
Oh, I thought that was limited to Ultimate.

I'm havin' problems installing Ultimate x64. Other than that, I'm pretty happy with Vista.
__________________
Q9450 @ 2.66 GHz || Zalman CNPS9700
ASUS Rampage Formula
320MB 8800 GTS (G80)
4GB Ballistix Tracer @ 1068 MHz
2X 150GB WD Raptors (RAID 0)
1TB Hitachi Deskstar
Antec Nine Hundred Case
750W Quad Silencer

FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND:F@H Team 44358 || Team Stats || My Stats || Hardware Contributions: Q9450/PS3/P4
mep916 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 07:45 PM   #47 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
I've got Dreamscene on Home Premium

All this stuff you here about Vista being full of bugs and hard to run... it just isn't... At all!

I've also found it to be well faster than XP too... but just my opinion!
Let me see where I had issues with vista...

Wacom tablets, 1.5 years old, not compatible with vista

Novell client (could be better now) although it worked, not with out its caveats.

Several printers don't work w/ 64bit that we had at my work

several needed applications won't work unless you upgrade, cost of upgrading was thousands and thousands in licenses. Not worth upgrading at this point.

networking - tons of issues

and of course the giant increase of hardware resources used.

Vista does not out perform XP though, and even if you dig through benchmarks you will find them neck and neck or XP beating vista. It just gives you the illusion by preloading applications into memory. Loading time may be a bit faster but actual performance while using an application is identical. Which is why its not worth the several hundred dollars to upgrade IMO.
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 07:50 PM   #48 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Garethman!!`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 17
Posts: 821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post

I've also found it to be well faster than XP too... but just my opinion!
Most users who have upgraded to Vista have noticed this, including me on my Athlon XP 3000+ college machine!

Athlon XP 3000+
1GB RAM
80GB HDD
Radeon 9250
Windows Experience Index = 1.0


Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarkin View Post

Vista does not out perform XP though, and even if you dig through benchmarks you will find them neck and neck or XP beating vista. It just gives you the illusion by preloading applications into memory. Loading time may be a bit faster but actual performance while using an application is identical. Which is why its not worth the several hundred dollars to upgrade IMO.
Its actually $69 to upgrade to Vista Basic on Newegg. On a test on my AthlonXP rig I did a month ago on another forum, Vista beat XP on almost every test, one by a very long way.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66GHz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2-800
PC6400 A-DATA / 2GB DDR2-667 PC5300 A-DATA
HDD : Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 750GB SATA/ Hitatchi Travelstar 120GB 5400RPM
GPU :Sapphire Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate / Windows Vista Home Premium

Last edited by Garethman!!`; 01-24-2008 at 07:52 PM.
Garethman!!` is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 07:55 PM   #49 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,821
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garethman!!` View Post
Its actually $69 to upgrade to Vista Basic on Newegg. On a test on my AthlonXP rig I did a month ago on another forum, Vista beat XP on almost every test, one by a very long way.
Not worth it to upgrade and lose features from XP, also provide links where Vista beats it out because from what I have read it hasn't and I will go google those links now.
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 07:59 PM   #50 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Garethman!!`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 17
Posts: 821
Default

Here is the link to the tests I did where I proved Vista beats XP on the lowest of the lowest PCs you would consider running Vista on

http://forums.pureoverclock.com/showthread.php?t=2166
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 2.66GHz / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2-800
PC6400 A-DATA / 2GB DDR2-667 PC5300 A-DATA
HDD : Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 750GB SATA/ Hitatchi Travelstar 120GB 5400RPM
GPU :Sapphire Radeon HD 2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate / Windows Vista Home Premium
Garethman!!` is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum