ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  

Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > Computer Memory and Hard Drives

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 01-22-2008, 01:55 AM   #11 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 152
Default

pc eye, you're on thin ice with those explanations. The harddrive's internal doesn't affect Windows in any way. The firmware present a range of addressable sectors to the outside world. So you don't need to write special tools to see the pluses and minuses.

StrangleHold explained the gap at the end, and why 250 is not 250 in Windows.
nyhk is offline  


Old 01-22-2008, 02:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,023
Default

Its whatever PC eye thinks it true, facts doesnt matter. Twist, Manipulate, Constrew till the point is lost and it doesnt matter anymore.
__________________
Welcome to the show
StrangleHold is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:27 AM   #13 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 21,092
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nyhk View Post
pc eye, you're on thin ice with those explanations. The harddrive's internal doesn't affect Windows in any way. The firmware present a range of addressable sectors to the outside world. So you don't need to write special tools to see the pluses and minuses.

StrangleHold explained the gap at the end, and why 250 is not 250 in Windows.
It simply goes over your head there. Besides that even you can install and then reinstall XP on the same drive over and over again and not see any gap while seeing it at other times. The unallocated space isn't always seen showing that convenience of easy installation without fuss is why you see that gap only when looking for it. It's simply due to the way the installer partitions the drive at the time.

MS simply created an explaination rather then revealing the fault with the XP drive tool there. And by the way where was the page for that seen? The ease of resizing the partition for simply filling in the small gap without any problems seen with Windows when changing drive letters or anything else shows that as a simple flaw with the installer itself.
PC eye is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:31 AM   #14 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Rudster816's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington
Age: 16
Posts: 82
Default

lol @ PC eye, i have my A+ book right next to me sitting at the page where it says the 8mb is left to make it easier to upgrade to a dynamic disk, and the book (by mike meyers, im sure you have heard of it) cuts through a lot of other microsoft bull crap, i doubt he is lying too.
__________________
Q6600 @ 2.4ghz Ocing Soon
Asus P5K-E Wifi
G-Skill 4GB (2x2) DDR2 800
Rosewill 650 Watt
EVGA 8800GTS 320MB 615/980
Seagate 1.5TB 7200 RPM SATA
Seagate 500GB 7200 RPM SATA
Western Digital 1TB 7200 RPM SATA

EVGA GTX Core 216 coming MONDAY
Xigmatek 750 Watt modular PSU coming MONDAY
Rudster816 is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:39 AM   #15 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,023
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PC eye View Post
MS simply created an explaination rather then revealing the fault with the XP drive tool there. And by the way where was the page for that seen?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/225822

This is my last post on this, not even going to get in a debate with this guy its pointless.
__________________
Welcome to the show
StrangleHold is offline  


Old 01-22-2008, 02:39 AM   #16 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 152
Default

Have you abandoned your platter theory? Anyways, as someone mentioned, no matter what is being said, you always come up with new interesting stories. It can be fun, but also annoying. So I will quit right now
nyhk is offline  
Old 01-22-2008, 02:58 AM   #17 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cromewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 26
Posts: 11,767
Default

Ok, seeing as this has been answered and to try and avoid confusing the original poster anymore I'm going to close this thread.

This post is correct.
__________________

You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in command here.

www.userfriendly.org
Cromewell is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
need help with my hard disk akis Computer Memory and Hard Drives 2 07-04-2006 01:54 AM
Slave hard disk recognition slap_ed Computer Memory and Hard Drives 5 04-10-2006 09:41 PM
Ive formatted hard disk, how do i get windows back on??? stevenson Computer Memory and Hard Drives 9 04-01-2006 04:01 AM
Will access page file damage the hard disk? gavinlao General Software 3 01-06-2006 07:58 PM
creating a hard drive in the new hard disk ucanadam Computer Memory and Hard Drives 1 12-19-2005 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.