Garethman!!`

No problem at all.

__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2 PC6400 / 2GB DDR2 PC5300
HDD : 750GB SATA Seagate Barracuda/ Hitachi 120GB 5400RPM
GPU : Radeon HD2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate x64 / Windows Vista Basic
PSU : Hiper 730W ATX / 80W Dell Laptop Power Brick

Vizy93

http://www.hiptechblog.com/2007/06/1...am-looks-like/
its tight

__________________
http://www.computerforum.com/6663-funniest-joke-world.html

"75% of all statistics are made up, including this one. 62.481% of people who read that believe it is true.
And if you're one of the 37.519% who don't, copy and paste this into your signature." - tlarkin, Cromewell, and Rambo.

MR_PERFECT

Stick with 32,atleast you have drivers that work half the time.

meanman

I think the 128gb mentioned earlier is meant to mean hdd size even so if that is the case its wrong anyway.
i run vista 64 because i have 4gb of ram but i must say i have had no problems finding the drivers i need, it runs really smooth.

__________________
my sig
Intel Core 2 Quad Pro Q6600 "Energy Efficient 95W Edition ocd to 3.15 ghz
Abit IP35 Pro (Socket 775) PCI-Express DDR2 Motherboard
Crucial Ballistix 4GB (2x1GB) DDR2 PC2-8500C5 1066MHz
EVGA GeForce 9800 GX2 "SSC Edition" 1024MB GDDR3
CoolerMaster Stacker 832
Coolermaster 700W ATX2.2 Modular SLI Compliant PSU
member of the cod 4 www.cfclan.co.uk

[-0MEGA-]

That is wrong, Windows XP SP2 can handle way more then 128GB, as I had my 1TB RAID setup with it. A 64-Bit OS can handle up to 128GB of RAM, not a 128GB hard drive.

__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06: 21391 // 9179

ashdavid

16 gigs will be the norm in only a year or two. Once the software companies are forced to supply for 64bit things will advance very quickly IMO. I mean 4 gig of DDR2 is so cheap these days.

__________________
I on a Japanese Vista OS. So I apologize in advance for my stupid and noob type questions.

tlarkin

I don't know what world you live in, but 16 gigs will not be the norm in a few years. Hell, I just bought a brand new dual xeon server, and it only has 4 gigs of RAM in it, and it does way more than anyone's personal computer does on this forum.

Unused RAM is pointless. The performance increase you will get from 4gigs to 16gigs will be nil, because you won't ever use up that much RAM. As for 64 bit Vs 32 bit, I would say stick with 32 bit because its not going anywhere and MS can't design an OS to save their life. If they had done Vista correctly, it would have both 32 and 64 bit libraries available in the OS, just like how everyone else does it. It is a marketing scheme.

voyagerfan99

You should! I'd contribute! I was born in 91 and got my first sights of a computer at the age of three. (An old laptop, possibly an old thinkpad?) Got the first family computer at 4, and a gateway 2000 when I turned 5. ($2500 for a tower, speakers, monitor). Boy have times changed.

ashdavid

How much did that set yopu back?

Even if the performance increase was very small, with the rate that new technology has improved I believe that it could be very possible to have 16gig RAM as the norm due to new technology gains in other areas. However with the introduction of DDR3 this could slow down the need for more ram due to a smaller amount doing a better job. Anyway thats the way I see it.

__________________
I on a Japanese Vista OS. So I apologize in advance for my stupid and noob type questions.