|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 420
|
Well ive had my PC OC for like a month now
But before i had a FSB : DRAM ratio of 1:1 with a DDR2 533 (266Mhz like my CPU) now its 2:3 with DDR2 800, i heard its better to have 1:1 for OCs What is it that i must have and does it matter?
__________________
● Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13Ghz (@ 2.536Ghz, CPU temp: 28° Idle, 45° Load) ● Biostar Tforce 965PT ● 2x1Gb DDR2 800 RAM CL6 @ 942mhz ● GeCube ATI X1650 Pro 256MB (soon an ATI 4870, just waiting to see the x2...) ● Huntkey DH power 500w (Can my PSU handle a ATI 4870?) ● Standard Case, 2 fans |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Solicitor's office
Posts: 951
|
1:1 is "the best" since it means that it's running in sync with the FSB, and running memory out-of-sync is only going to give you better results when memory is significantly faster than FSB. So you'd probably be better off having your memory set to 1:1...
Setting your RAM to 1:1 usually means that it's running at a speed lower than it's designated speed, it gives you more overclocking headroom, which of course is good since your RAM won't be limiting you OC...
__________________
BY READING THE ABOVE POST, YOU AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING: "The above post is provided solely for entertainment purposes and is not to be taken as professional advice. Therefore, I shall not be held responsible for any damage or losses that are result from anything I have posted, to the extent applicable by law. In the unlikely event that I CAN be held responsible, I have never been here, I am not here, and I will never be here, and it will be highly questionable whether I even exist." Last edited by hackapelite; 04-29-2008 at 12:11 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 624
|
would there be any instability of the OC'ing if the memory is running faster than the fsb? for example, 1:2 or 2:3? you will probably get a better performance, but a little less stability since it's not running in sync right?
Last edited by WhiteFireDragon; 04-29-2008 at 12:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 420
|
so then what is the point of getting DDR2 800?
i should then bring the Clock down.... I would need a 3.2Ghz CPU with a x8 multipier to make it 1:1 So DDR2 800+ is then practically useless...
__________________
● Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13Ghz (@ 2.536Ghz, CPU temp: 28° Idle, 45° Load) ● Biostar Tforce 965PT ● 2x1Gb DDR2 800 RAM CL6 @ 942mhz ● GeCube ATI X1650 Pro 256MB (soon an ATI 4870, just waiting to see the x2...) ● Huntkey DH power 500w (Can my PSU handle a ATI 4870?) ● Standard Case, 2 fans |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Solicitor's office
Posts: 951
|
@Dragon - Running memory out-of-sync won't cause any instability, unless the memory is some generci brand/value ram and is running outside of its specs. You won't get better performance unless the memory is running SIGNIFICANTLY faster than FSB when out of sync.
@Freak - I should imagine that DDR2 800 should allow you to set the timings a bit tighter when the memory is running below its stock speeds, which of course increases performance. Also, AFAIK (I take it you're OCing the comp in your sig) E6* series CPUs have FSB of 1333mts, which means that at 1:1 ratio your ram should be running at 667 - and if you want to raise your FSB (the only way to OC that CPU) and had 667 ram, your ram would ahve to be OCed which would/could be limiting your OC (get what I'm saying...?)
__________________
BY READING THE ABOVE POST, YOU AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING: "The above post is provided solely for entertainment purposes and is not to be taken as professional advice. Therefore, I shall not be held responsible for any damage or losses that are result from anything I have posted, to the extent applicable by law. In the unlikely event that I CAN be held responsible, I have never been here, I am not here, and I will never be here, and it will be highly questionable whether I even exist." Last edited by hackapelite; 04-29-2008 at 12:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 26,397
|
Running in a 1:1 ratio is best for performance IF you can achieve the same speed by manipulating the FSB. Running in a 1:1 ratio on a stock processor to give you DDR2 533 is not going to be faster then running at DDR2 800.
What I would do is set it to 1:1, but lower the multiplier 1-2x, then you can achieve the same CPU speed, but a higher FSB, which in turn would raise the memory speed.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.83GHz Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L ATI HD 3870 GDDR4 @ (840/2332) 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2-850 500GB SATAII HD w/16MB SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 11593 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 184
|
I also use that ratio, i can oc more up to 2.8ghz but the ram wont let me to and im happy with 1:1 ratio as it run syncronize all the way.
__________________
Code name "Zephyr" CPU: Core 2 Duo E6320 OC @2.80Ghz W/ Artic Cooling Freezer 7Pro MOBO: Abit Fatal1ty FP-IN9 SLI Nvidia NForce 650i RAM: Mushkin HP 2GB (2x1GB) PC6400 800Mhz GPU: MSI Nvidia Geforce 8800GT 512MB 256BIT DDR3 OC DRIVE: Lite On 18x DVD-RW HDD: Western Digital Caviar 160GB (2 x 80GB) SATAII SOUND: Creative Audigy Value W/ Altec Lansing FX4021 Display: LCD Samsung Syncmaster 223BW PSU: Silverstone Strider ST50F 500W |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Solicitor's office
Posts: 951
|
Quote:
My brain's shorting out...
__________________
BY READING THE ABOVE POST, YOU AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING: "The above post is provided solely for entertainment purposes and is not to be taken as professional advice. Therefore, I shall not be held responsible for any damage or losses that are result from anything I have posted, to the extent applicable by law. In the unlikely event that I CAN be held responsible, I have never been here, I am not here, and I will never be here, and it will be highly questionable whether I even exist." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 420
|
yeah, in my BIOS i saw no option to change my multiplier.....
And my FSB is 1066, not 1333. Currently my CPU is at 313mhz and ram is at 471Mhz So its better to have the ram speed and the bus speed at 1:1..
__________________
● Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13Ghz (@ 2.536Ghz, CPU temp: 28° Idle, 45° Load) ● Biostar Tforce 965PT ● 2x1Gb DDR2 800 RAM CL6 @ 942mhz ● GeCube ATI X1650 Pro 256MB (soon an ATI 4870, just waiting to see the x2...) ● Huntkey DH power 500w (Can my PSU handle a ATI 4870?) ● Standard Case, 2 fans |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ram speed, 800 vs 1000 | N3rd | Computer Memory and Hard Drives | 8 | 04-25-2008 03:22 AM |
| Another question about RAM and CPU bus | SquiggDoggs | Computer Memory and Hard Drives | 4 | 01-23-2007 02:24 PM |
| I want to buy a monster PC... | DanTheMan | Desktop Computers | 168 | 08-07-2006 09:32 AM |
| Change RAM speed | Bobo | Computer Memory and Hard Drives | 37 | 12-04-2004 02:08 PM |
| Using mixed RAM speeds and FSB speed | Serraglio | Computer Memory and Hard Drives | 1 | 11-23-2004 01:55 PM |