|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersery
Posts: 53
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,944
|
This laptop will be used for AIM, Email, school work, Ipod, reasearching etc..
Any basic laptop will do that, be it Mac or a PC. It just comes down to features and benefits and your price range and preferences. A Mac will do it all and give you every feature you need out of the box. A PC can't quite do all that a Mac can out of the box but it can with third party. Depending on other uses, like gaming, audio recording, film editing, etc, could also play into what you want your laptop for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersery
Posts: 53
|
how does something like this look?
HPdv9700t series: Upgrade to Genuine Windows Vista Ultimate with Service Pack 1 (64-bit) • Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo Processor T8300 (2.40GHz) • 17.0" diagonal WXGA+ High-Definition HP BrightView Widescreen Display (1440 x 900) • 4GB DDR2 System Memory (2 Dimm) • 512MB NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GS • HP Imprint (Radiance) + Fingerprint Reader + Webcam + Microphone • Intel(R) PRO/Wireless 4965AGN Network Connection • 240GB 7200RPM SATA Dual Hard Drive (120GB x 2) • LightScribe SuperMulti 8X DVD+/-RW with Double Layer Support • No TV Tuner w/remote control • High Capacity 8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery • Norton Internet Security(TM) 2008 - 3 Year Subscription • Microsoft(R) Works 9.0 all for $1712.99 Now I can probably go with a 15.4" instead of a 17" but any thoughts? Last edited by EWC88; 05-13-2008 at 03:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan, USA
Age: 14
Posts: 1,070
|
That looks good, but a 15" would be better in my opinion.
__________________
Alienware Area-51 M15x Owner
Thinking of getting a Camera? Read this first. http://www.computerforum.com/125639-...ml#post1026478 |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 423
|
Those specs are complete overkill for what you're wanting to do; I 've always saved my cash and bought what I needed.
As a rule, 1Gb ram will run XP very well, and 2Gb will run Vista at a similar speed (as far as my experience goes). The 4Gbs on that spec will go to waste with word processing etc... Future proof? A laptop will no doubt die long before an upgrade would be required (again based on my experience - I'd never have a laptop as my main computer. My flat mate just had his sony vaio die with all his work on it - end of uni is weeks away...) I'd be tempted to get a solid, quick, but basic desktop and buy a macbook as well (the fact that they're small is the appeal, they're lovely little things!).
__________________
2006 Mac Pro Dual, dual core xeons @ 2.0Ghz each 2Gb Ram (I'm too poor) NVidia Geforce 7300Gt 256mb Onboard Sound - optical out to Logitech Z5500 Digidesign MBox2 output to PMCs 250Gb Drive running both Mac OSX and Windows on seperate partitions, 400Gb Seagate Drive for Windows, 400Gb WD Drive for OSX 24¨ Acer AL2416W (not nearly as bad as you'd think) Various Lacie external drives |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Jersery
Posts: 53
|
For the genuine vista it needs they say 62bit and the 4gb is what would be needed it stated thats what I put that..
I think I will go with the 15.4" instead.. And I'm still questionable because I can get a mac book pro for the same prioce... |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: LA, Westside
Age: 14
Posts: 2,174
|
Vista? No. Vista does not need 4gb of ram. its a complete waste. Trust us, frome xperience, 2gb is enough for vista, especially for what your planning to do.
And the 'bit' thing. Only 64 bit os can read more than 3.25gb of ram.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 5,944
|
Quote:
Furthermore, 64-bit OSes also can take advantage of 64-bit instruction sets, which is another advantage. However, the developer of your app, the OS, and the hardware all have to support it, so there is no real advantage for an end user running 64bit at this point in time. Server side stuff 64bit is where its at. |
|
|
|
|