ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

View Poll Results: Which CPU would you recommend?
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 14 43.75%
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 4 12.50%
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 14 43.75%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-06-2008, 08:35 PM   #21 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
voyagerfan99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,088
Default

I've heard some really great reviews on the Q6600. I chose that one.
__________________
Drum Major - Windham High School Marching Band
Mach Speed MSNV-939 nForce Socket 939
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (OC'd to 2.20 Ghz)
Power Up Black ATX Mid-T Case w/450w & Clear Side
3 GB DDR RAM
450 GB Storage (80-ATA, 120-ATA, 250-SATA)
Visiontek Radeon x1650 Pro 512MB
22" Viewsonic LCD w/ iPod Dock + 17" Dell CRT
Logitech G15 Gaming Keyboard

Computer Pics
voyagerfan99 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-06-2008, 08:40 PM   #22 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
computeruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 30
Posts: 435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garethman!!` View Post
I see Newegg have a OEM Q6600 w/no fan for $182.99. Man, these CPUs, just keep going lower in price!
woa yesterday they had a q6600 for like 240 or something! wow!
EDIT
i didnt see that on there link?

Last edited by computeruler; 05-06-2008 at 08:42 PM.
computeruler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 08:44 PM   #23 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
Default

The Q6700 is much cheaper now, and better priced for it's performance. I would recommend the Q6700.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 09:55 PM   #24 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
cohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 14
Posts: 8,162
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by voyagerfan99 View Post
I've heard some really great reviews on the Q6600. I chose that one.
likewise
__________________
My Website Forum Site JOIN NOW!
Desktop / Laptop
Motherboard: Asus M2N X SE / Unknown
CPU: AMD 4000+ 2.1GHZ x 2 / Intel Pentium M 1.60GHZ
Ram: 2GB Transcend / 512MB
Hard Drive: 320GB / 60GB
Video Card: Both Intergrated
Monitor: 19" Benq / 15.4"
OS: Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1 / Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3
cohen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 04:26 AM   #25 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2
Default

I vote the Q6600.

Although to be honest I have had some mixed results using this chip, but thats most likely because I got a bad batch I can't oc my Q6600 any further then 2.8GHZ on a 680i board XMS-2 DDR2 800 ram and an aftermarket cooler. Usually I am pretty good at ocing but no such luck here. I tried every different voltage and fsb\ram divider setting under the sun and still the chip refuses to be stable at anything above 2.8

Oh well, even then this is a great chip its the way to go I would think as others have said the gain between 45mm and 65mm is minimal when compared to price.
Jucies is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-07-2008, 04:39 AM   #26 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
ramodkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: There >
Age: 16
Posts: 4,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
The Q6700 is much cheaper now, and better priced for it's performance. I would recommend the Q6700.
Yeah the Q6700 price halved!

But I still think the Q6600 is better for the $$$
__________________
E2160 w/AC Freezer 7 Pro
Gigabyte P35-DS3L
2GB BallistiX Tracers PC2-6400
Sapphire HD3870
Rosewill RD500 500W
Antec Three Hundred (Modded)

ramodkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 04:54 AM   #27 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
HumanMage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 772
Default

Maximum PC just did a section on two of these three CPUs ( Q6600 and Q9300) and long story shot, the Q9300 won three out of the five rounds. The Q9300 is a tad better in performance, overclocking potential, and specs. So I'd go with the Q9300, personally.
__________________
-----Laptop: Asus G1-----
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3403
HumanMage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 05:27 AM   #28 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Garethman!!`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 18
Posts: 1,205
Default

How would the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 fair up with the other CPUs? It looks like the Q6600 is my winner though.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2 PC6400
/ 2GB DDR2 PC5300
HDD : 750GB SATA Seagate Barracuda/ Hitachi 120GB 5400RPM
GPU : Radeon HD2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate x64 / Windows Vista Basic
PSU : Hiper 730W ATX / 80W Dell Laptop Power Brick
Garethman!!` is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 06:37 PM   #29 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
kenpomaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: super fun america land
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by royalmarine View Post
the difference between 45 nm and 65nm is feck all compared to the price difference between the 2.

the q6600 kills the other's when its bang for buck.
this is an untrue statement

Q9300=284.99 on newegg(274.99 OEM)....higher native clock(2.5), higher native FSB(1300), 45nm tech (allows for higher OC generally), lower power consumption at highest maufacturer spec
Q6600=219.99 on newegg (no OEM available at the time, which is usually the case for this chip)...has slightly more L2 cache, which is misleading in this case because the 6600 has 2 L2 modules equalling 8Mb while the 9300 has 1 L2 module for 6 Mb, higher voltage which in general means higher temps, other wise they are very similar.

I think the benefits of the Q9300 far outweigh the measly $65 dollar price increase (at least it doesn't cost a grand like the much over-hyped extreme editions)

and for people that think the 20nm space difference in the architecture doesn't make a difference, maybe you should read up on thermodynamics in electronic engineering before you open your yap again.

mobo-ASUS P5E3 wifi ap@n
CPU-Intel Q9300 @2.5GHz
RAM-4GB Patroit EP DDR3 1333 (2 DIMMS)
HDD-WD Raptor 150GB @ 10,000rpm
VGA-ZOTAC Geforce 9600GT 512MB, 256-bit
PSU-Cooler Master Real Power Pro 750W
__________________
"When you're under attack, instead of throwing a grenade, throw one of those small pumpkins. That will make everyone stop and think how stupid war is...Then while they're thinking, throw a real grenade"- Jack Handy
kenpomaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 06:45 PM   #30 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: birkenheas,uk near liverpool
Age: 27
Posts: 154
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenpomaster View Post
this is an untrue statement

Q9300=284.99 on newegg(274.99 OEM)....higher native clock(2.5), higher native FSB(1300), 45nm tech (allows for higher OC generally), lower power consumption at highest maufacturer spec
Q6600=219.99 on newegg (no OEM available at the time, which is usually the case for this chip)...has slightly more L2 cache, which is misleading in this case because the 6600 has 2 L2 modules equalling 8Mb while the 9300 has 1 L2 module for 6 Mb, higher voltage which in general means higher temps, other wise they are very similar.

I think the benefits of the Q9300 far outweigh the measly $65 dollar price increase (at least it doesn't cost a grand like the much over-hyped extreme editions)

and for people that think the 20nm space difference in the architecture doesn't make a difference, maybe you should read up on thermodynamics in electronic engineering before you open your yap again.

mobo-ASUS P5E3 wifi ap@n
CPU-Intel Q9300 @2.5GHz
RAM-4GB Patroit EP DDR3 1333 (2 DIMMS)
HDD-WD Raptor 150GB @ 10,000rpm
VGA-ZOTAC Geforce 9600GT 512MB, 256-bit
PSU-Cooler Master Real Power Pro 750W
what is the diff between 65nm and 45nm? all u said was the price and being able to over clock abit more but no real diff ?
i dunno where i can read up about thermodynamics
headcrabCAKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Installing a CPU ????? Heatsink is in the way of locking the CPU down? Pauly73Drifter CPUs and Overclocking 3 04-27-2008 06:57 AM
Upgrade CPU on current machine easy? UpskirtHayley CPUs and Overclocking 3 03-16-2008 11:36 PM
Thinking to buy a new CPU Fan vxdesigns Computer Cases, Power Supplies and Cooling 9 02-27-2006 02:20 AM
is my cpu overheating? and why? austringer CPUs and Overclocking 1 02-26-2006 06:39 PM
overclocking guide pt 2 Rick G CPUs and Overclocking 0 02-07-2004 04:45 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum