ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

View Poll Results: Which CPU would you recommend?
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 14 43.75%
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 4 12.50%
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 14 43.75%
Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2008, 08:39 PM   #31 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
ramodkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: There >
Age: 16
Posts: 5,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenpomaster View Post
mobo-ASUS P5E3 wifi ap@n
CPU-Intel Q9300 @2.5GHz
RAM-4GB Patroit EP DDR3 1333 (2 DIMMS)
HDD-WD Raptor 150GB @ 10,000rpm
VGA-ZOTAC Geforce 9600GT 512MB, 256-bit
PSU-Cooler Master Real Power Pro 750W
Why don't you OC your Q9300?
__________________
E2160 w/AC Freezer 7 Pro
Gigabyte P35-DS3L
2GB BallistiX Tracers PC2-6400
Sapphire HD3870
Rosewill RD500 500W
Antec Three Hundred (Modded)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
I wish my grass was Emo, so it'd cut itself.
ramodkk is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-07-2008, 09:13 PM   #32 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
kenpomaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: super fun america land
Posts: 34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ramodkk View Post
Why don't you OC your Q9300?
i recently (just before i built my new comp) broke my cooling fan (am using the stock fan now) and am waiting on the new one to arrive before i start OC'in it, because while im sure i could take it to at least 3GHZ with the stock fan, am i going to take any chances? no.

anyway back to the debate at hand. the 9300 will run faster clock speeds natively, higher OC'ability and less heat(because of the 45nm tech), less power consumed for higher stock speed(which also translates into higher overclockability generally)....i don't really think the 6600 can shake a stick at the 9300, the benchmarks are very clear in this case ex:Q6600 ran Unreal Tournament 3 at 14 frames per second slower than the 9300, and was considerably slower with 3dmark06. the best cpu for ur money is the 9300 because of its OC ability

for those that think im just talking to talk look here:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...0_9.html#sect0

the 1 exception to my case is the OC'd 6600 at 3.6Ghz vs the OC'd 9300 at 3.5, the OC'd 6600 wins in a few of the tests because it's OC'd farther, but I would say you can take the 9300 higher because of the lower heat, and even at a lower clock speed it still beat out the 6600 in a couple cases because the signals have to travel a shorter distance on the 9300 (20nm difference again)
__________________
"When you're under attack, instead of throwing a grenade, throw one of those small pumpkins. That will make everyone stop and think how stupid war is...Then while they're thinking, throw a real grenade"- Jack Handy

Last edited by kenpomaster; 05-07-2008 at 09:46 PM.
kenpomaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 03:15 PM   #33 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Nvidia4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 70
Default

The q6600. It's gives me a 5.9 Vista score. You can compare that to the score of your other components and see if it's good enough to match your whole setup without being overkill. I have had no problems with my 6600 and it does not limit my gaming experience.
__________________
q6600 overclocked to 3.00ghz
coolermaster vortex 752 cpu cooler
xfx nforce 680i lt sli
evga nvidia 8800gts 320mb
kingston pc-6400 800mhz 4gb (2x2gb)
windows vista home premium 64bit
antec p182 case
antec trupower trio 650w
Nvidia4life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 04:47 PM   #34 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Garethman!!`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 18
Posts: 1,337
Default

Thanks for everybody's input, I see Newegg have now priced the Q6600 at $214.99, truly outstanding price now.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017&nm_mc=OTC-RSS&cm_mmc=OTC-RSS-_-CPUs+%2f+Processors-_-intel-_-N82E16819115017

Personally I think Ill go for a Q9300 or Q9450 processor as it has to be future proof for a couple of years, also, I have heard the Q9450 can be overclocked to 3.8GHz stable? If this is true, it would be such a bargain.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2 PC6400
/ 2GB DDR2 PC5300
HDD : 750GB SATA Seagate Barracuda/ Hitachi 120GB 5400RPM SATA
GPU : Radeon HD2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate x64 / Windows Vista Basic
PSU : Hiper 730W ATX / 80W Dell Laptop Power Brick

Last edited by Garethman!!`; 05-11-2008 at 04:51 PM.
Garethman!!` is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 04:53 PM   #35 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
ducis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,564
Default

i think that its undebatable
the Q9300 is proven to have better performance as well as OC ablity its just a question of whether your mobo supports it or not
__________________
formerly firsttimebuilder
pm me for any questions on sub ambient cooling
FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358

My Guide to Benchmark Cooling
Free Website Hosting!
ducis is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-11-2008, 07:12 PM   #36 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
computeruler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 30
Posts: 435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garethman!!` View Post
Thanks for everybody's input, I see Newegg have now priced the Q6600 at $214.99, truly outstanding price now.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819115017

Personally I think Ill go for a Q9300 or Q9450 processor as it has to be future proof for a couple of years, also, I have heard the Q9450 can be overclocked to 3.8GHz stable? If this is true, it would be such a bargain.
yes it is possible even on air and make shure you get a good overclocking motherboard
computeruler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 07:43 PM   #37 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Garethman!!`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 18
Posts: 1,337
Default

Indeed, I definitely want a x38 or x48 motherboard at minimum.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2 PC6400
/ 2GB DDR2 PC5300
HDD : 750GB SATA Seagate Barracuda/ Hitachi 120GB 5400RPM SATA
GPU : Radeon HD2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate x64 / Windows Vista Basic
PSU : Hiper 730W ATX / 80W Dell Laptop Power Brick
Garethman!!` is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 08:03 PM   #38 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
ramodkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: There >
Age: 16
Posts: 5,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kenpomaster View Post
i recently (just before i built my new comp) broke my cooling fan (am using the stock fan now) and am waiting on the new one to arrive before i start OC'in it, because while im sure i could take it to at least 3GHZ with the stock fan, am i going to take any chances? no.
You should take it to 3.0GHz with stock fan and record temps so you can compare the temps to those with your new cooler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garethman!!` View Post
Indeed, I definitely want a x38 or x48 motherboard at minimum.
Why do you want an X38/48?
__________________
E2160 w/AC Freezer 7 Pro
Gigabyte P35-DS3L
2GB BallistiX Tracers PC2-6400
Sapphire HD3870
Rosewill RD500 500W
Antec Three Hundred (Modded)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
I wish my grass was Emo, so it'd cut itself.
ramodkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2008, 09:50 PM   #39 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Garethman!!`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 18
Posts: 1,337
Default

I heard the X38 or X48 was the best chipset for LGA775?
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2 PC6400
/ 2GB DDR2 PC5300
HDD : 750GB SATA Seagate Barracuda/ Hitachi 120GB 5400RPM SATA
GPU : Radeon HD2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate x64 / Windows Vista Basic
PSU : Hiper 730W ATX / 80W Dell Laptop Power Brick
Garethman!!` is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Installing a CPU ????? Heatsink is in the way of locking the CPU down? Pauly73Drifter CPUs and Overclocking 3 04-27-2008 07:57 AM
Upgrade CPU on current machine easy? UpskirtHayley CPUs and Overclocking 3 03-17-2008 12:36 AM
Thinking to buy a new CPU Fan vxdesigns Computer Cases, Power Supplies and Cooling 9 02-27-2006 03:20 AM
is my cpu overheating? and why? austringer CPUs and Overclocking 1 02-26-2006 07:39 PM
overclocking guide pt 2 Rick G CPUs and Overclocking 0 02-07-2004 05:45 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum