36GB VS 74GB Raptor

ANNR · 05-12-2008, 07:07 PM

I am looking for a Hard drive for installing the OS only.

Are there any difference between the Two Raptor that I mentioned beside their size?

Read and Seek time are the same for the two drive so is there going to be any difference when it comes to OS startup time?

Nothing beside the OS and software that keep the OS safe. so anti what ever.

Thanks

tlarkin · 05-12-2008, 07:15 PM

74gig has a faster access time, so its over all performance will be better. It may have more cache too, I would double check that.

lovely? · 05-12-2008, 07:37 PM

if the 32 is cheaper then i'd get it, since 32 gb is definetely enough for just an operating system and at most a few hundred megs of software...

diduknowthat · 05-12-2008, 09:34 PM

the 32 is slower than the 74, which is slower than the 150 (or something like that). There's really no point in getting the old raptors anymore, as modern day hard drives are almost just as fast (if not faster) than them.

bluedishwasher · 05-12-2008, 09:41 PM

i would seconed the above, it really isn't worth it. if you want a super fast boot time, have a look into some solid state drives, although they are a little pricey

tlarkin · 05-12-2008, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by diduknowthat

the 32 is slower than the 74, which is slower than the 150 (or something like that). There's really no point in getting the old raptors anymore, as modern day hard drives are almost just as fast (if not faster) than them.

Minus the 5 year warranty raptors come with and the 10,000 RPM platters. It is still faster than your standard SATA HD.

The larger ones (newer) have faster seek and access times, and more cache which makes up the difference.

ANNR · 05-13-2008, 03:37 AM

Newegg shows all the raptors with same 16mb cache, same seek, read time and latency for all the raptors that they carry.

Is that a mistake on neweggs part?

if not then all of then should perform the same beside the GB difference right?

tlarkin · 05-13-2008, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANNR

Newegg shows all the raptors with same 16mb cache, same seek, read time and latency for all the raptors that they carry.

Is that a mistake on neweggs part?

if not then all of then should perform the same beside the GB difference right?

That is probably a mistake since the 36 gig is the first generation raptor and the
74gig is the 2nd gen raptor.

Here goes the first google hit comparing the benchmarks

http://www.anandtech.com/storage/sho...spx?i=2073&p=4

Here goes a comparison of the 74 vs the Raptor X

http://techreport.com/articles.x/9364

05-12-2008, 07:07 PM	#1 (permalink)
ANNR Platinum Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 805	36GB VS 74GB Raptor I am looking for a Hard drive for installing the OS only. Are there any difference between the Two Raptor that I mentioned beside their size? Read and Seek time are the same for the two drive so is there going to be any difference when it comes to OS startup time? Nothing beside the OS and software that keep the OS safe. so anti what ever. Thanks __________________ Vista Ultimate x64 Antec 900 Q6600 Zotac 8800GTs 2x2GB Dual DDR800 SEAGATE ST3500320AS 500GB 2x500GB WD Slave 27" LCD

05-12-2008, 07:37 PM	#3 (permalink)
lovely? Diamond Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: California Age: 15 Posts: 3,658	if the 32 is cheaper then i'd get it, since 32 gb is definetely enough for just an operating system and at most a few hundred megs of software... __________________ E4500 @ 2.93GHZ ASUS P5K-DELUXE 2GB OCZ Reaper CL3 @ 800MHZ 3-4-4-15 eVGA 8800GT OZC GameXStream 700W PSU 320GB WD Caviar SATA, 80GB WD Caviar IDE Sometimes scientists make things alot harder than they need to. All they've gotta do is put a big spring on the ground where they think it's gonna land, or send a mission to the moon to erect a sign that says "Welcome to Earth".

05-12-2008, 09:34 PM	#4 (permalink)
diduknowthat formerly liuliuboy Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Massachusetts Age: 17 Posts: 6,166	the 32 is slower than the 74, which is slower than the 150 (or something like that). There's really no point in getting the old raptors anymore, as modern day hard drives are almost just as fast (if not faster) than them. __________________ Silent Tuned \| 3D Marks 06: 11566 Q6600 2.4ghz CPU \| Gigabyte GA-P35 LGA 775 MB EVGA 8800gt 512mb Video Card G.Skill 4GB Ram \| Western Digital 400GB HD X-Fi Xtrememusic Sound Card Antec P180B Case \| Scythe Ninja HSF CM Real Power Pro 650watt PSU

05-12-2008, 09:41 PM	#5 (permalink)
bluedishwasher Platinum Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: UK Age: 17 Posts: 639	i would seconed the above, it really isn't worth it. if you want a super fast boot time, have a look into some solid state drives, although they are a little pricey __________________ - Jon

05-13-2008, 03:37 AM	#7 (permalink)
ANNR Platinum Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 805	Newegg shows all the raptors with same 16mb cache, same seek, read time and latency for all the raptors that they carry. Is that a mistake on neweggs part? if not then all of then should perform the same beside the GB difference right? __________________ Vista Ultimate x64 Antec 900 Q6600 Zotac 8800GTs 2x2GB Dual DDR800 SEAGATE ST3500320AS 500GB 2x500GB WD Slave 27" LCD

05-12-2008, 07:15 PM	#2 (permalink)
tlarkin VIP Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Kansas City, MO Posts: 5,953	74gig has a faster access time, so its over all performance will be better. It may have more cache too, I would double check that.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
RAID 0 Dual 74gb Raptor's VS. 150gb Raptor	Powergeek_	Computer Memory and Hard Drives	2	01-16-2008 07:00 PM
Raptor Drive 74GB	leetkyle	Computer Memory and Hard Drives	7	08-22-2006 11:37 PM
74gb raptor raid or single?	djray77	Computer Memory and Hard Drives	14	07-18-2006 07:40 PM
is the wd raptor 1 better than the maxtor 10 16mb?	davie23223	Computer Memory and Hard Drives	9	10-20-2005 04:32 PM
backup configs for 36gb raptor drives...	mikelx21	Computer Memory and Hard Drives	3	08-25-2004 03:08 PM