ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Laptop and Smartphones

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2008, 06:44 PM   #11 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Irishwhistle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarkin View Post
depending on the level of photo editing depends on what hardware you need. If it is not professional level a macbook should do fine. Photo editing is all processor and ram performance. I have 5,500 C2D macbooks on my network and I have deployed CS3 Premium on about 200 of them. Never had a complaint that it wouldn't run, and these are stock macbooks with only 1 gig of RAM.
Well, I'm hoping to do professional level editing where my photos are worth paying for...

Maybe it would be best if I upgraded to 2GB?
__________________
Christmas Rig On It's Way

--Asus M3A78-CM Mobo
--AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz CPU
--Rosewill Stallion RD400-2-SB PSU
--2GB DDR2 RAM
--120GB Seagate HD
--Integrated ATI Radeon HD 3100 Graphics

Irishwhistle is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-03-2008, 06:46 PM   #12 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 346
Default

Don't buy RAM from their website.
__________________
McSame / MILF '08
`PaWz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 06:48 PM   #13 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarkin View Post
depending on the level of photo editing depends on what hardware you need. If it is not professional level a macbook should do fine. Photo editing is all processor and ram performance. I have 5,500 C2D macbooks on my network and I have deployed CS3 Premium on about 200 of them. Never had a complaint that it wouldn't run, and these are stock macbooks with only 1 gig of RAM.
Well CS3 runs on my Acer Celeron M 1.86GHz, 1GB of RAM and Vista

I would strongly encourage upgrading to 2-4GB of RAM.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 06:50 PM   #14 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Irishwhistle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by `PaWz View Post
Don't buy RAM from their website.
Because it's too expensive you meen? Where should I get it?
__________________
Christmas Rig On It's Way

--Asus M3A78-CM Mobo
--AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz CPU
--Rosewill Stallion RD400-2-SB PSU
--2GB DDR2 RAM
--120GB Seagate HD
--Integrated ATI Radeon HD 3100 Graphics

Irishwhistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 07:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Age: 18
Posts: 346
Default

Yes, they overcharge them. You can get good notebook memory on newegg for much cheaper
__________________
McSame / MILF '08
`PaWz is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-03-2008, 07:05 PM   #16 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 7,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
Well CS3 runs on my Acer Celeron M 1.86GHz, 1GB of RAM and Vista

I would strongly encourage upgrading to 2-4GB of RAM.
Yeah it should run, depending on the load you put on it depends on how well it will run.


Just get third party ram, ram is ram these days.
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 05:30 PM   #17 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kill Bill View Post
Eh no remember photo editing is 2D work and Leopard isn't as power hungry as XP/Vista

I think that MacBook you pointed is fine and the OS it'self really just use 6GB OF HDD and the 120GB is really like 105GB then you have 99GB left to rule the world so in my opinion it will be fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarkin View Post
depending on the level of photo editing depends on what hardware you need. If it is not professional level a macbook should do fine. Photo editing is all processor and ram performance. I have 5,500 C2D macbooks on my network and I have deployed CS3 Premium on about 200 of them. Never had a complaint that it wouldn't run, and these are stock macbooks with only 1 gig of RAM.
Wrong. Adobe Photoshop CS4 is moving more of the graphics work to the GPU, which will allow you to zoom, pan and move across incredibly large images at full detail with little to no lag time (assuming you have a decent video card).
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 06:56 PM   #18 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Irishwhistle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 2,305
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
Wrong. Adobe Photoshop CS4 is moving more of the graphics work to the GPU, which will allow you to zoom, pan and move across incredibly large images at full detail with little to no lag time (assuming you have a decent video card).
Well, at the moment I'm using Gimp and the new feature wont decrease speed on bad graphics cards will it?
__________________
Christmas Rig On It's Way

--Asus M3A78-CM Mobo
--AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 2.6GHz CPU
--Rosewill Stallion RD400-2-SB PSU
--2GB DDR2 RAM
--120GB Seagate HD
--Integrated ATI Radeon HD 3100 Graphics

Irishwhistle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:18 PM   #19 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 7,011
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
Wrong. Adobe Photoshop CS4 is moving more of the graphics work to the GPU, which will allow you to zoom, pan and move across incredibly large images at full detail with little to no lag time (assuming you have a decent video card).
That still doesn't take a top of the line GPU. In reality if you are rendering really high quality digital data, you want to probably get a Quadro or some other sort of work station render card.

Gaming cards still will have very small effect. With processors improving so rapidly they will still be the bread and butter of performance with photo or film editing.

Once you dabble into the 3rd rendering world, where you are rendering actual 3D objects and not 2D photos, then the GPU starts to shine.

So, it be may true, but it is also relative and subjective.
tlarkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 07:28 PM   #20 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
speedyink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PA
Age: 21
Posts: 2,325
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishwhistle View Post
I assume it has a standard monitor port so I can plug it into my 17", does it?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but someone brought in their macbook into the store looking for a monitor cable, and it had some crazy messed up port on it. I dunno if it's a standard mac connection or something, but it definately wasn't VGA.
__________________
Desktop/Laptop:
Acer AM5100/Dell Inspiron 6400/Asus EEE 900HA
AMD Phenom 9500 Quad core @ 2.2GHZ/Core 2 Duo T5300 @ 1.73ghz/Intel Atom 1.6ghz
4GB DDR2 RAM/2GB 533mhz RAM/1GB DDR2
750GB HDD/320 GB HDD/160 GB
512mb Nvidia GeForce 8800GTS @ 800/2000/1050/256mb Radeon Mobility X1400 HM/Intel GMA 950
Vista Home Premium/Vista Home Premium/Vista Ultimate
Creative SB X-Fi

My Deviantart

Last edited by speedyink; 06-05-2008 at 12:36 AM.
speedyink is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:02 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum