ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Desktop Computers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-07-2008, 04:09 AM   #11 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debbiewalker87 View Post
Hey, Omega, so core 2 duo surpasses AMD's.. what about quad core?
The Core 2 Quads are also better then AMD's, but the dual cores are cheaper and are usually better for most people.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-07-2008, 06:05 AM   #12 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
g25racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hamilton, MI
Posts: 3,923
Default

^^ Hopefully AMD will catch up soon!! lol
__________________
CPU - AMD Athlon 64x2 5200+ @ 2.6ghz
Ram - 2GB Stock clock
HD - 320gb seagate & Samsung 750gb 32mb cache
GPU - XFX 8600GT XXX Zalman @ 680 or 700mhz
PSU - Ultra X-finity 600watt
OS - Vista Home Premium(32) & Ubuntu (8.04) Ultimate Ed
Audio - JVC 460watts
Control - Logitech G25 Wheel & Logitech Rumblepad 2
Games - GTR2 and LFS
-- Race Sim's for Life --
g25racer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 04:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
The Core 2 Quads are also better then AMD's, but the dual cores are cheaper and are usually better for most people.
Hi Omega, I really appreciate your effort replying. Thanks very very much!
It is quite surprising to know that core2duos are usually better than core2quads? Could you tell me why?
debbiewalker87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 05:01 PM   #14 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by debbiewalker87 View Post
Hi Omega, I really appreciate your effort replying. Thanks very very much!
It is quite surprising to know that core2duos are usually better than core2quads? Could you tell me why?
Because now you can get Core 2 Duo's that go up to 3.16GHz, whereas the fastest Core 2 Quad is 2.66GHz (I believe). So for most people who only run a few apps at once, you will see faster performance from a higher clocked dual-core then a slower clocked quad-core.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 03:50 AM   #15 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 21
Default Duo vs. Quad

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-] View Post
Because now you can get Core 2 Duo's that go up to 3.16GHz, whereas the fastest Core 2 Quad is 2.66GHz (I believe). So for most people who only run a few apps at once, you will see faster performance from a higher clocked dual-core then a slower clocked quad-core.
So what you are saying is that if I want to do some video editing and burning dual layer dvd's, surfing the web and running word or excel at the same time (sometimes I will start the video editing and burning the dvd's, and my kids will come and want to do a homework project/report and run word while surfing the net for information), it would be better to have the core 2 duo instead of the quad? This situation does happen during the school year and I have to tell them to wait (you know what the wife will say about that!) or shut down my video stuff. I ask this question because I am about to build a new computer to handle this. (Is it possible for under $1000? I have been reading this site and am ready to take on the challenge myself!)
Bob The Builder is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-16-2008, 06:07 PM   #16 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 13
Default Duo vs. Quad

Hey, could someone reply to Bob the Builder's post? It's kinda my concern too. Any helpful reply from previous posters to this thread would be very much appreciated.
debbiewalker87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2008, 06:58 PM   #17 (permalink)
Moderator
 
oscaryu1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 13
Posts: 10,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob The Builder View Post
So what you are saying is that if I want to do some video editing and burning dual layer dvd's, surfing the web and running word or excel at the same time (sometimes I will start the video editing and burning the dvd's, and my kids will come and want to do a homework project/report and run word while surfing the net for information), it would be better to have the core 2 duo instead of the quad? This situation does happen during the school year and I have to tell them to wait (you know what the wife will say about that!) or shut down my video stuff. I ask this question because I am about to build a new computer to handle this. (Is it possible for under $1000? I have been reading this site and am ready to take on the challenge myself!)
Quad. Most people here want the E8400 to GAME. Other tasks, the Quad chews them up and spits it out. 3GHz x2, vs Quad (Q6600) 2.4GHz x2 (or so the game recognizes)...

So... again...

Gamers - E8400
Mutitaskers + Light gamers - Q6600
__________________

Core 2 Duo E2140 1.6GHz @ 3.04GHz
GA-P31-DS3L
pqi Turbo CL4 DDR2-800 2GB
Sapphire HD3850 256MB
Sony Writemaster DVD Burner EIDE
Seagate Barracuda 80GB 7200.9 8MB SATII
oscaryu1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Whats the difference? MBGraphics CPUs and Overclocking 8 07-17-2008 02:43 AM
Big Difference 2.8ghz And 3.2ghz X2? flashy_dachshund CPUs and Overclocking 6 04-07-2008 08:01 PM
ram speed difference salman Computer Memory and Hard Drives 3 03-01-2007 07:51 PM
Will i notice a difference between these ckfordy Computer Memory and Hard Drives 5 04-16-2006 08:24 PM
Is it any difference??? t3Ri Computer Networking and Servers 3 06-07-2005 06:31 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:44 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum