ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > Video Cards and Monitors

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-17-2008, 10:15 AM   #11 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Computer_Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: South Africa
Posts: 450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scubie67 View Post
I have a 22 inch 1650 x 1080 and I came from a 19 inch before that.I want to go even bigger (1920 x 1200) ,for gaming it makes a huge difference .Even for just multimedia and internet I would go at least 22 inch just for comfort.Once you have a large screeen you wont want to go back to a smaller.even the 22 inch are fairly affordable now.
Thing is, here in South Africa, things are very expensive...

The samsung im looking at getting cost $330...

Its between these two

Samsung SyncMaster 920NW - $300

Samsung SyncMaster 753GW - $330


That is for a 19", 1440x900 screen

Its too expensive to go more than that, and to be honest, i really dont mind my 17" CRT screen size

19" wide is plenty, plus, i wanna play crysis on high (possibly very high)...
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 2.13Ghz (@ 2.536Ghz, CPU temp: 28° Idle, 45° Load)
Biostar Tforce 965PT
2x1Gb DDR2 800 RAM CL6 @ 942mhz
GeCube ATI X1650 Pro 256MB (soon an ATI 4870)
Huntkey DH power 500w (Can my PSU handle a ATI 4870?)
Standard Case, 2 fans

For All those who want a good Hardware monitor
Computer_Freak is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-17-2008, 02:05 PM   #12 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
just a noob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: cardboard mansion
Posts: 1,438
Default

crt's are actully better for gaming, as they have no actual lag between signal and display
__________________
free crysis killer I got
300mhz celeron@450mhz
32mb of ram
windows 98
ati rage 8mb card baby :P
just a noob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2008, 02:27 PM   #13 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by just a noob View Post
crt's are actully better for gaming, as they have no actual lag between signal and display
When LCD's were new to the market, I would agree. While this is still true LCD's today have response times as low as 2-4ms, which is significantly faster then the 20ms+ LCD's of years ago. Not to mention that LCD's use less power, have brighter displays, much smaller, etc.

They are even coming up with LCD's that will turn off pixels to achieve the true black similar to CRT's, which will give them huge 10,000:1 (or was it 100,000:1?) contrast ratios.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATI 4870 and flashing the BIOS? Computer_Freak Video Cards and Monitors 5 07-06-2008 08:15 AM
Can an ATI 4870 run on this PSU?? Computer_Freak Video Cards and Monitors 1 07-05-2008 02:45 PM
ATI Radeon HD 4870 suffering from premature deaths maroon1 Video Cards and Monitors 20 07-02-2008 04:13 AM
ATI 4870 vs Nvidia 9800 GX2 ALEKSA Video Cards and Monitors 10 07-01-2008 10:11 PM
ATI 4870 or Nvidia 9800GTX? Computer_Freak Video Cards and Monitors 7 06-29-2008 06:53 AM



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:09 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum