ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2008, 08:53 AM   #1 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
mac550's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cornwall, UK
Age: 20
Posts: 532
Default AMD X2 6400+ Or Intel E8400

I was looking into getting a new CPU later on this year, now as far as i know L2 cache is short term memory for the CPU and the more it has the better it can multi-task. The two chips i was looking at is the Athlon X2 6400+ with 2x1Mb L2 cache and the Intel E8400 3.0GHz with 2x3Mb L2 cache. Am i right in saying that the Intel would handle multi-tasking and games better them the AMD.
Thanks
__________________
CPU:Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0 GHz
Mobo
:XFX 680i LT SLI
RAM
:OCZ SLI Ready 2Gb DDRII 6400
GPU
:2 Gainward 8800GT 512Mb in SLI
HDD:
2 Western Digital 250Gb SATAII in RAID 0
OS
:Win Vista Premium x64
LCD
:Samsung 19 inch
3D Marks 06
:15670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
Jolly good show, chap. First, I must finish my tea and crumpets, then we shall set out and whoop some arse. I'll bring my trusty Lee-Enfield.
mac550 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-23-2008, 09:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
cohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 14
Posts: 8,179
Default

Yes, Intel are better for multitasking, they win ever time.
__________________
My Website
Desktop / Laptop
Motherboard: Asus M2N X SE / Unknown
CPU: AMD 4000+ 2.1GHZ x 2 / Intel Pentium M 1.60GHZ
Ram: 2GB Transcend / 512MB
Hard Drive: 320GB / 60GB
Video Card: Both Intergrated
Monitor: 19" Benq / 15.4"
OS: Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1 / Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3
cohen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 09:27 AM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
maroon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,635
Default

Yes E8400 is much faster
__________________
Free softwares: Avast! antivirus - FireFox - FDM - OpenOffice - CCleaner
maroon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 09:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
mac550's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cornwall, UK
Age: 20
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by maroon1 View Post
Yes E8400 is much faster
any idea how much faster it is over a X2 4400+ at 2.6GHz?
__________________
CPU:Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0 GHz
Mobo
:XFX 680i LT SLI
RAM
:OCZ SLI Ready 2Gb DDRII 6400
GPU
:2 Gainward 8800GT 512Mb in SLI
HDD:
2 Western Digital 250Gb SATAII in RAID 0
OS
:Win Vista Premium x64
LCD
:Samsung 19 inch
3D Marks 06
:15670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
Jolly good show, chap. First, I must finish my tea and crumpets, then we shall set out and whoop some arse. I'll bring my trusty Lee-Enfield.
mac550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 10:03 AM   #5 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
cohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 14
Posts: 8,179
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac550 View Post
any idea how much faster it is over a X2 4400+ at 2.6GHz?
3.0GHZ dual Core.
__________________
My Website
Desktop / Laptop
Motherboard: Asus M2N X SE / Unknown
CPU: AMD 4000+ 2.1GHZ x 2 / Intel Pentium M 1.60GHZ
Ram: 2GB Transcend / 512MB
Hard Drive: 320GB / 60GB
Video Card: Both Intergrated
Monitor: 19" Benq / 15.4"
OS: Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1 / Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3
cohen is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-23-2008, 10:16 AM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
maroon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac550 View Post
any idea how much faster it is over a X2 4400+ at 2.6GHz?
Check this review
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...t_3.html#sect1

4400+ @ 2.6GHz is equivalent to 5000+
__________________
Free softwares: Avast! antivirus - FireFox - FDM - OpenOffice - CCleaner
maroon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 02:47 PM   #7 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
mac550's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cornwall, UK
Age: 20
Posts: 532
Default

wow bit of a difference. Thanks Guys
__________________
CPU:Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0 GHz
Mobo
:XFX 680i LT SLI
RAM
:OCZ SLI Ready 2Gb DDRII 6400
GPU
:2 Gainward 8800GT 512Mb in SLI
HDD:
2 Western Digital 250Gb SATAII in RAID 0
OS
:Win Vista Premium x64
LCD
:Samsung 19 inch
3D Marks 06
:15670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
Jolly good show, chap. First, I must finish my tea and crumpets, then we shall set out and whoop some arse. I'll bring my trusty Lee-Enfield.
mac550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 02:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
cohen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 14
Posts: 8,179
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac550 View Post
wow bit of a difference. Thanks Guys
A bit???

i think you mean " a HUGE difference "
__________________
My Website
Desktop / Laptop
Motherboard: Asus M2N X SE / Unknown
CPU: AMD 4000+ 2.1GHZ x 2 / Intel Pentium M 1.60GHZ
Ram: 2GB Transcend / 512MB
Hard Drive: 320GB / 60GB
Video Card: Both Intergrated
Monitor: 19" Benq / 15.4"
OS: Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 1 / Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3
cohen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2008, 03:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
mac550's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Cornwall, UK
Age: 20
Posts: 532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cohen View Post
A bit???

i think you mean " a HUGE difference "
lol yeah that too!
think thats going to be next upgrade.
__________________
CPU:Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0 GHz
Mobo
:XFX 680i LT SLI
RAM
:OCZ SLI Ready 2Gb DDRII 6400
GPU
:2 Gainward 8800GT 512Mb in SLI
HDD:
2 Western Digital 250Gb SATAII in RAID 0
OS
:Win Vista Premium x64
LCD
:Samsung 19 inch
3D Marks 06
:15670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
Jolly good show, chap. First, I must finish my tea and crumpets, then we shall set out and whoop some arse. I'll bring my trusty Lee-Enfield.
mac550 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2008, 08:28 AM   #10 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,630
Default

actually amd and intel are hand in hand in my opinion, amd is just focusing on different things right now. intel clocked its processors slightly higher and their chips have the ability to clock higher because they are 45nm, whereas amd is still using 65nm tech.
__________________

Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3ghz
HD 4850 512mb (750/2350mhz)
2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835 (5-4-4-10)
2x80gb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive
250gb sata2 storage drive
13,574 - 3dmark06 score
fade2green514 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Custom INTEL System Build midleman81 Desktop Computers 13 05-06-2008 03:40 AM
eXtreme PSU Calculator Update mnemonik23 Computer Cases, Power Supplies and Cooling 18 03-13-2008 05:25 PM
Need Help choosing: AMD or Intel ? chaabk Desktop Computers 10 07-16-2007 03:13 AM
AMD slower ghz? Zabarl CPUs and Overclocking 36 07-19-2006 08:47 PM
Mobo 101 Praetor Motherboards 5 07-15-2006 02:41 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum