ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > General Chat > General Computer Chat

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2008, 05:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Ambushed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,059
Default Intel Nehalem's Market Named Leaked to be Core i7

Making its way around the Internet late last week was speculation of the official name for Intel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Corporation ’s future processor microarchitecture, currently codenamed Nehalem.



If the rumors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumors are to be correct, the Intel Core i7 and Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition processors will officially be announced August 11 with an expected launch date of Q4 2008.

Nahalem is expected to be initially manufactured with a 45nm process and be available with two, four, or eight cores, for up to 731 million transistors in the quad core variant. A very exciting aspect of the new architecture is the new integrated memory controller http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_controller , called the Intel QuickPath Interconnect, with DDR3 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DDR3_SDRAM SDRAM support, which will eliminate the bottleneck that was the front side bus and which had been haunting Intel for years. This should result in a substantial performance increase despite Intel’s competition, AMD, having been using an integrated memory controller in their processors for years.

Another feature of Nahalem will be the re-introduction of Hyper-Threading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyper-threading technology, which was used previously in the Pentium 4 series of processors. Hyper-Threading allows a single core to run an adjacent virtual core, allowing for two threads per actual core, making for potential performance gains. With all the added performance of the upcoming Nahalem processors, power usage is not expected to rise much, providing for greater performance-per-watt efficiency.

Nehalem will come in variants for desktops http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/desktop , servers, and notebooks. The upcoming home desktop variant is codenamed Bloomfield and will use the new LGA1366 socket, making it incompatible with all previous generation motherboards.

Source: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/cor...alem,6093.html
__________________
Core 2 Duo E6550 2.3GHz @ 3.4GHz
FOXCONN MARS
2GB DDR2 800
500GB western digital SATA II
XP Professional SP3
Nivida GeForce 9600GT 512MB
19" LCD widescreen 5ms

www.easycomputers.co.nz
Ambushed is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 08-11-2008, 05:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
tknick90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 18
Posts: 1,540
Default

I wonder what the prices are going to look like around launch.
__________________
MOBO: ASUS P5N-D LGA 775 NVIDIA nForce 750i SLI
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q6700 Kentsfield 2.66 GHz (@3.0 GHz)
GFX CARD: ZOTAC GeForce 9800 GTX AMP! Edition
RAM: CORSAIR 4GB (2 x 2GB) DDRII 800 MHz (@900 MHz)
HDD: Western Digital 500GB, 7200 RPM
PSU: OCZ StealthXStream 600w

CASE:
Antec 900

tknick90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 05:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
ducis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,532
Default

eight cores is stupid 16 virtual cores is even more stupid, stop shinking dies and adding more cores and start making some real discoveries !
__________________
formerly firsttimebuilder
pm me for any questions on sub ambient cooling
FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358

My Guide to Benchmark Cooling
Free Website Hosting!
ducis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 05:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
jdbennet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: England / Dundee
Posts: 1,653
Default

Quote:
LGA1366
lol the next socket should be socket 1337 (leet lol)
__________________
Quote:
I am not an expert so try what i say at your own risk
jdbennet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 06:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Kill Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ireland
Age: 12
Posts: 1,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ducis View Post
eight cores is stupid 16 virtual cores is even more stupid, stop shinking dies and adding more cores and start making some real discoveries !
But practically why all in all if they make new discoveries it will = 8 cores.

I really hope this comes out before april next year because the mac pro with 16 cores
__________________
Macbook Pro 2.5GHz 17'' matte,2.5GHz C2D Penryn,2GB 667MHz,8600M GT 512mb,250GB 5400RPM,
Mac OS Leopard (Latest Firmware) with Vista Ultimate A.K.A bootcamp.
Kill Bill is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 08-11-2008, 06:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Tuffie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia.
Age: 16
Posts: 1,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kill Bill View Post
I really hope this comes out before april next year because the mac pro with 16 cores
Great even more computing ability no one can or will use.
__________________
formerly XRT
Quote:
Originally Posted by McLovin11 View Post
First of all your gay
Second of all your really gay
Quote:
Originally Posted by pokethesmot View Post
punch that shit in the mouth.....i mean disk tray thinga ma jigger lol
Tuffie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 06:22 PM   #7 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
ScOuT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Posts: 523
Default

Ya that's great.....if your running a huge server in your house. There are only a few programs that take advantage of 4 cores at the moment. The only cool thing is the price of the extreme series will drop, maybe I see a QX9775 in my future
ScOuT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 07:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Kill Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ireland
Age: 12
Posts: 1,031
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuffie View Post
Great even more computing ability no one can or will use.
Ehehem 20-40 FCP Rendering in 1 hour Also Crysis. if you think like that then might as well not make new CPUS
__________________
Macbook Pro 2.5GHz 17'' matte,2.5GHz C2D Penryn,2GB 667MHz,8600M GT 512mb,250GB 5400RPM,
Mac OS Leopard (Latest Firmware) with Vista Ultimate A.K.A bootcamp.
Kill Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 11:05 PM   #9 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ducis View Post
eight cores is stupid 16 virtual cores is even more stupid, stop shinking dies and adding more cores and start making some real discoveries !
Multiple cores is the future, not clockspeed.

So if the Corei7 comes out today, what motherboard are we to use? Unless there are already some out (haven't looked yet).
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 960 (6-6-6-18)
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2008, 11:08 PM   #10 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
ramodkk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: There >
Age: 16
Posts: 4,974
Default

^ Exactly, I read somewhere that Intel is guaranteeing to have an (at least) 80 Core CPU by 2013. Which I think is too much time...
__________________
E2160 w/AC Freezer 7 Pro
Gigabyte P35-DS3L
2GB BallistiX Tracers PC2-6400
Sapphire HD3870
Rosewill RD500 500W
Antec Three Hundred (Modded)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kornowski View Post
I wish my grass was Emo, so it'd cut itself.
ramodkk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What does a quad core processor do for you in the current software market? Joyce P Desktop Computers 10 03-17-2008 02:31 AM
Can the Intel Core 2 Duo beat this fatdragon CPUs and Overclocking 11 01-28-2007 12:52 PM
intel C2D shows only 1 core anggun999 CPUs and Overclocking 8 01-14-2007 12:49 AM
amd x2 3800+ vs intel core 2 duo Sirius_GTO CPUs and Overclocking 4 09-29-2006 01:55 PM
Buyers Guide - Choosing A Processor thecustompc_com CPUs and Overclocking 11 07-05-2006 01:11 AM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:07 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum