ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Gaming > Computer Games and Consoles

View Poll Results: Which system will you buy?
PS3 38 31.67%
Xbox 360 47 39.17%
Neither, my computer kicks their ass. 35 29.17%
Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-23-2005, 06:06 PM   #91 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 17
Default

I have to agree with some of the replies on here about the xbox or ps2 being better. It is all about what you like and can play. I have both the xbox and ps2, some games I like on the xbox and some games I like on the ps2. I think they are both great consoles. As far as the xbox360 or ps3, I will get them both. I am expecting my xbox360 on Nov. 22. When Sony releases the ps3, i will get that one two. I will also get on the sameday Halo3. My vote is to get both systems and have a kickass computer.
dar2lit is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 09-23-2005, 06:56 PM   #92 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Lordmord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 175
Default

I got to go with PS3, I have being saving all of my extra cash for that.
Lordmord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 06:48 AM   #93 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Zhuge Liang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 83
Default

Eventually both, if they came out at same time, Id get the 360 first.

I got it preordered from months ago. Cant wait for it
Zhuge Liang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2005, 06:42 PM   #94 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
Default

most likely i wont get either, but if i decide to get one, it would be the xbox, but not until the price comes down.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 05:32 AM   #95 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
epidemik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ashland Oregon
Age: 16
Posts: 2,574
Default

I would probably get an xbox but not until an awesome game (like Halo), which isnt compatible with my PS2, is released for it giving me a good reason to upgrade. Also most of my friends will probably get it and it always is fun to bring games and memory cards to someone elses house. I will definately wait until prices come down and the fix a few of the errors that have been reported.
__________________
E7200
Sapphire HD4850
OCZ Platinum 2GB RAM
Western Digital 320GB HD
LITEON DVD Burner
OCZ 600W SXS

CF xFire Group: Click Here Then PM Me If You Apply

Last edited by epidemik; 12-20-2005 at 05:34 AM.
epidemik is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-20-2005, 05:46 AM   #96 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Modoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 553
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GhostEye
did u bother to even read up on the specs of the 2 systems? their CPU's are extremely shitty. They cant even compete with old P4's let alone a amd 64. at the moment the only differences with speed between these two, will be who can code the most efficient code for which system. Also note, once multi threaded games come out (which wont be forawhile i know), the ps3 will be left in the dust. Till then, their performances will be almost identical.
the xbox will be left in the dust. the ps3 will be able to handle multiple threads without question, as it will have essentially 7 cores. that is the purpose of using the chip in the ps3.
__________________
X2 3800+ Toledo @ 2.0GHz w/ Zalman 9500
2GB OCZ DC EL Plat. 2-3-2-5 2T
MSI K8N-Neo4
2 x WD 36GB SATA Raptors
eVga 7800GT @ 470/1200
FSP AX500-A 500w
Modoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2005, 09:53 AM   #97 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
maroon1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Somewhere in Hell !!!
Posts: 2,600
Default

i will not buy any of them, i will stick on my pc

but between ps3 and xbox360, i would go with ps3 without even thinking, because it is more powerful than xbox360 interms of both cpu and gpu, and the more important thing that it has much better games than xbox360.

here some links that shows that ps3 is much more powerful than xbox360

PlayStation 3 is compared with Xbox 360 and a PC clocked at 3.2 Ghz in Floating Point Performance http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?...1003.jpg&gwp=8

A side-by-side comparison between Xbox 360 and PS3 can be seen here http://www.bigkid.com.au/2005/05/17/xbox-360-vs-ps3

some infomation about ps3 http://www.answers.com/ps3
xbox360 http://www.answers.com/xbox%20360
Revolution http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery?...&curtab=2222_1
__________________
Free softwares: Avast! antivirus - FireFox - FDM - OpenOffice - CCleaner
maroon1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 02:23 AM   #98 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Raditz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Heheh...You'll never find this place, it doesn't exist.
Age: 23
Posts: 1,158
Default

ps3 for me. Not an xbox fan. My computer kick ass.
__________________
My Computer Parts:
AMD Athlon{tm} XP 2600+
1.91 GHz, 1.50 GB of RAM
Video card: ATI 9800 Pro
Harddrives:
Local C: 37.2
Local F: 300 GB

GOOGLE IS YOUR FRIEND
Raditz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 12:16 AM   #99 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 100
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Modoman
the xbox will be left in the dust. the ps3 will be able to handle multiple threads without question, as it will have essentially 7 cores. that is the purpose of using the chip in the ps3.

Ahhh sony has plagued the mind of many people as they usually do. Yes i guess you could say the Cell processor has essentially 7 cores (specifically called SPE's), however what Sony doesnt' say is that the SPE's are very specific, meaning they will go completly unused unless specific instructions are given to each one. Also, the SPE's work more like hyperthreading.....not really a full core, nor are they running at 3.2ghz. Furthermore, as amazing as the Cell looks on paper, 1. its going to be EXTREMLY difficult to program for (in fact at one point, The Cell was supposed to handle everything in the PS3, but after seeing its limitations in some departments they realized they needed a dedicated graphics chip.) So the best parts of the Cell are going to be limited by the GPU. In the end, i think xbox and sony's powerhouses are really a lot more similar then what most poeple think. To top it off, xbox360 uses a PowerPC chip, something developers are very used to developing on meaning better quality games are def. coming onto the xbox360 long before the ps3. Now the real winner of this war is IBM seeing they have a hand in all three processor, not bad at all IBM.

Just wanted to add a statement that IBM made:
"According to recent testing by IBM [7], SPEs can be expected to reach 75.9% of their theoretical performance."

Last edited by Thug541; 12-22-2005 at 01:01 AM.
Thug541 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 12:28 AM   #100 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Modoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 553
Default

well... speculation aside im still not jumping out of my seat for either. pc is vastly superior imo, just not as much variety when it comes to games.
__________________
X2 3800+ Toledo @ 2.0GHz w/ Zalman 9500
2GB OCZ DC EL Plat. 2-3-2-5 2T
MSI K8N-Neo4
2 x WD 36GB SATA Raptors
eVga 7800GT @ 470/1200
FSP AX500-A 500w
Modoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:57 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum