|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: May 2005
Location: Michigan
Age: 19
Posts: 176
|
For overall price to performance ratio, AMD is better, it is also much better in gaming, but Intel is better for multitasking.
__________________
Athlon64 3700+, EPoX EP-9NDA3+, 1GB 2-3-2-5 DDR400, BFG 7800GS OC @ 505/1.46, 250GB, 160GB, 120GB, DVD, CD-RW, 570W Skyhawk PowerOne, WinXP Pro |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 25
|
Games are not my main thing...like I said, just doing stuff at the same time...so, I donīt want to have a slow pc...want to use msn, winamp, edit something in a program or burn a cd at the same time...The price difference isnīt big at all...what do you think?
Last edited by ciroalb; 06-03-2005 at 12:52 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 19,954
|
See CPU 101
__________________
ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, Q6600@3.7 / ASUS P5ND, E6400@3.8 4GB OCz Platinum XTC 8500 / 4GB CorsairXMS2 6400 5x500GB Seagate 7200.10 / 2x500 Seagate 7200.10 OCz 8800GTX 768MB @ 630/800 / 2x Galaxy 8800GT SLI |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|