ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  

Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Desktop Computers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 06-05-2009, 11:22 PM   #1
Terabyte Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mainland United States
Posts: 4,246
Default Which type of computer component has the fastest throughput?

I was just doing a test. The following question came up:

Question: Which type of computer component has the fastest throughput when accessing data?


Their answer:
Random Access Memory

I say it is the Central Processing Unit. Which answer is right and why?
__________________
"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." -- Benjamin Franklin

Solution for Energy Problems
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZR0U...yer_embedded#!

Power Supply: OCZ StealthXStream OCZ600SXS
Video Card and RAM: Asus ATI Radeon HD4670 1 gigabyte and Super Talent PC3 12800 4 gigabytes
Processor and Motherboard: Phenom II 945 Quad-Core and GIGABYTE GA-970A-D3
2048Megabytes is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-05-2009, 11:44 PM   #2
banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Age: 13
Posts: 263
Default

Well it depends on what type of DATA is being accessed the ROM lache harddrive etc etc
barney.stinson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 01:00 AM   #3
Zettabyte Member
 
bomberboysk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana (Boiler Up!)
Age: 18
Posts: 12,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2048Megabytes View Post
I was just doing a test. The following question came up:

Question: Which type of computer component has the fastest throughput when accessing data?


Their answer:
Random Access Memory

I say it is the Central Processing Unit. Which answer is right and why?
When ACCESSING data? Level 1 cache on a cpu, Then Level 2, Then Level 3(if it has it), then the ram.
__________________
CPU: Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.2Ghz | Mobo:EVGA X58 SLI LE | GPU: EVGA GTX285 SSC| Ram: 6Gb (3x2Gb) Corsair 1333Mhz | Case: Xclio WTBKAdvanced | Sound: Modded X-fi Fatal1ty Championship,Cerwin-Vega e312's w/ Kenwood VR-806 reciever, Sennheiser HD555 (Modded to 595)| Storage: 160Gb Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 2TB Western Digital Caviar Green| PSU:750W PCP&C Silencer |OS: Windows 7 Enterprise x64|
Dont skimp on a power supply
New? Dont forget to read the rules. My Heatware
bomberboysk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 03:39 AM   #4
Terabyte Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mainland United States
Posts: 4,246
Default

Thanks for the useful information bomberboysk. I wonder why they put RAM has the highest throughput when accessing data? The people writing these tests are supposed to have knowledge about how a computer works.
__________________
"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." -- Benjamin Franklin

Solution for Energy Problems
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZR0U...yer_embedded#!

Power Supply: OCZ StealthXStream OCZ600SXS
Video Card and RAM: Asus ATI Radeon HD4670 1 gigabyte and Super Talent PC3 12800 4 gigabytes
Processor and Motherboard: Phenom II 945 Quad-Core and GIGABYTE GA-970A-D3
2048Megabytes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 03:43 AM   #5
Zettabyte Member
 
bomberboysk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana (Boiler Up!)
Age: 18
Posts: 12,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2048Megabytes View Post
Thanks for the useful information bomberboysk. I wonder why they put RAM has the highest throughput when accessing data? The people writing these tests are supposed to have knowledge about how a computer works.
I would imagine as the level 1/2/3 cache is more for repetitive tasks then actual data, you've seen ramdrive programs i assume, you ever see cache-drive programs?
__________________
CPU: Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.2Ghz | Mobo:EVGA X58 SLI LE | GPU: EVGA GTX285 SSC| Ram: 6Gb (3x2Gb) Corsair 1333Mhz | Case: Xclio WTBKAdvanced | Sound: Modded X-fi Fatal1ty Championship,Cerwin-Vega e312's w/ Kenwood VR-806 reciever, Sennheiser HD555 (Modded to 595)| Storage: 160Gb Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 2TB Western Digital Caviar Green| PSU:750W PCP&C Silencer |OS: Windows 7 Enterprise x64|
Dont skimp on a power supply
New? Dont forget to read the rules. My Heatware
bomberboysk is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 06-06-2009, 03:47 AM   #6
formerly liuliuboy
 
diduknowthat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 21
Posts: 9,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberboysk View Post
I would imagine as the level 1/2/3 cache is more for repetitive tasks then actual data, you've seen ramdrive programs i assume, you ever see cache-drive programs?
That's because the CPU would suffer greatly if it loses some of it's cache to a cache-drive...
__________________

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 | 4GB G.Skill DDR2 800 Memory
60GB OCZ Agility SSD | 400GB WD SATA HD
Galaxy GTX 560 Ti 1GB GPU | Asus Xonar D1 Sound card
Hauppauge HVR 1800 MCE TV Tuner
Coolermaster Elite 330 Case | Seasonic X-Gold 660W PSU
M-Audio AV 40 Speakers | Polk Audio PSW10 Subwoofer
diduknowthat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 03:58 AM   #7
Zettabyte Member
 
bomberboysk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana (Boiler Up!)
Age: 18
Posts: 12,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diduknowthat View Post
That's because the CPU would suffer greatly if it loses some of it's cache to a cache-drive...
Thats what i was saying
__________________
CPU: Intel i7 920 C0 @ 3.2Ghz | Mobo:EVGA X58 SLI LE | GPU: EVGA GTX285 SSC| Ram: 6Gb (3x2Gb) Corsair 1333Mhz | Case: Xclio WTBKAdvanced | Sound: Modded X-fi Fatal1ty Championship,Cerwin-Vega e312's w/ Kenwood VR-806 reciever, Sennheiser HD555 (Modded to 595)| Storage: 160Gb Seagate Barracuda, 1TB Seagate 7200.12, 2TB Western Digital Caviar Green| PSU:750W PCP&C Silencer |OS: Windows 7 Enterprise x64|
Dont skimp on a power supply
New? Dont forget to read the rules. My Heatware
bomberboysk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 01:47 PM   #8
fmw
Kilobyte Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 474
Default

OP, you are correct because of the higher transfer rate.
fmw is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
gateway t1620 hoangnguyen86vn Operating Systems 79 01-13-2011 04:23 PM
What PSU would you recommend for my type of computer? MetroidJunkie08 Computer Cases, Power Supplies and Cooling 5 11-01-2008 01:05 PM
Computer is messed up bcorz Desktop Computers 3 10-05-2008 04:45 AM
Computer starts but won't load! olimess Desktop Computers 3 09-10-2008 09:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2011 Computer Forum - Camera Forum - Web Design Forum