ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  

Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-04-2009, 03:37 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
The batch numbers only matter when they were first released. The fist batch numbers have already been bought up. Its just a hit and miss thing now. Between the 550 and 720, get the 720. If they dont unlock atleast you have a tri core.
Yeah finally i changed my mind about 550 and got 720.
I didn't want to go with a dual core in case of non unlocking..
I purchased a used 720 for 100$ and if everything goes bad ( i hope not ) i will have a tricore..
I don't know what would be the best mobo?
Asrock 770 series or the Gigabyte 770?
Mitsel is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 11-04-2009, 03:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,181
Default

The Gigabyte. A better quality board. To unlock it on the Gigabyte set the ACC in the bios to Hybird and set all cores to auto or all.
__________________
NZXT Apollo
S75QB 750W
ZEROtherm FZ120
Phenom II 720BE (X4) 3.5GHZ.
Gigabyte GA MA790X UD4P
G Skill DDR2 1066 4GB.
MSI GTS 250
Seagate 7200.12 500GB.

Welcome to the show
StrangleHold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 01:05 AM   #3 (permalink)
Moderator
 
bomberboysk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Northeast Ohio, But mainly infront of computer
Age: 16
Posts: 8,112
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87dtna View Post
Open your eyes man. The ASRock board has THREE 16x slots. 16x/8x/4x. If just 2 is in crossfire it's 8x. If you run 3 way THEN it's only 4x.
Doesnt matter...20 lanes is 20 lanes no matter how you split it up(Whether it be x16, x4 or x8,x8,x4)Plus if you are going crossfire you wouldnt want to go with a 785 chipset in the first place(its more or less just a 770 chipset with integrated graphics anyhow)

Also, ASrock is the low end sector of asus, Asus wouldn't use their low end sector to compete against themselves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
The Gigabyte. A better quality board. To unlock it on the Gigabyte set the ACC in the bios to Hybird and set all cores to auto or all.
+1
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.90Ghz Custom Water Loop | Mobo: EVGA 790i Ultra SLI | GPU: 9800gtx and GTS250 in SLI| Ram: 4GB(2 x 2gb) 1333Mhz ddr3 | Case: Xclio WTBKAdvanced | Sound: X-fi Fatal1ty Championship, Z-5500 5.1 Surround| HDD: 2x Raid 0 7200.11 500gb | PSU: Zalman ZM-1000HP |OS: Windows 7 Enterprise x64|
Dont skimp on a power supply,if it fails, it usually takes out other components alongside it.
New? Dont forget to read the rules. Heatware
P.M. If interested in Shin Etsu X23-7783D

Last edited by bomberboysk; 11-05-2009 at 01:09 AM.
bomberboysk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 01:27 AM   #4 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: PA
Age: 24
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberboysk View Post
Doesnt matter...20 lanes is 20 lanes no matter how you split it up(Whether it be x16, x4 or x8,x8,x4)Plus if you are going crossfire you wouldnt want to go with a 785 chipset in the first place(its more or less just a 770 chipset with integrated graphics anyhow)

Also, ASrock is the low end sector of asus, Asus wouldn't use their low end sector to compete against themselves.
The asus board you linked too had one 16x and one 4x. With crossfire it would only be 4x/4x. The ASRock I linked too had 16x/8x/4x, thats 28 lanes VS 20. Crossfire is 8x/8x. The Asus board only has 2 slots.

The highest end ASRock is way better than the lowest end Asus. It's not competing, just increasing sales for those who don't know.
__________________
Matt
''The beatings will continue until morale improves''
Main rig-
AMD Phenom II 550 unlocked to B50 quad@3.8ghz, Antec 200 case, Gigabyte MA785GMT-UD2H board, 4gb G.Skill DDR3-1600 ram, EVGA gts250 GPU, OCZ 700w PSU, 2x dvd burners, seagate 640gb HDD 7200.11, Windows 7 RC.
87dtna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 02:22 AM   #5 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87dtna View Post
The asus board you linked too had one 16x and one 4x. With crossfire it would only be 4x/4x. The ASRock I linked too had 16x/8x/4x, thats 28 lanes VS 20. Crossfire is 8x/8x. The Asus board only has 2 slots.
Your wrong on both accounts.

A 785 chipset only allows 16 PCIe lanes for Graphics.

The Asrock puts a Switch board for Switching 8 lanes to the second slot. If you have the switch board turned to 16 lanes for the main slot the second slot is dead. Which gives it CrossfireX support. But not Tri C/F. The third slot gets its 4 lanes from the southbridge and cant be used as a third slot for Tri C/F.

Lastly it’s down to expansion slots and the additional chipsets the board uses. Thanks to the 785G's CrossFireX support, ASRock has taken advantage of this and included a total of three PCIe x16 slots. 785G only has 16 lanes for graphics, so you either have a single x16 slot or 2 x8 slots for CrossFireX mode. (The last x16 slot is simply an x4 slot running off the Southbridge).
ASRock has been given a black mark also on its implementation of CrossFireX switching. Many other companies use digital switches to switch the PCI Express lanes, ASRock has gone and used a switch over paddle card, similar to the ones used when SLI was first released. This makes setting up CrossFireX a bit more of an effort if you already have one card installed. You have to take this video card out, switch the paddle around, reinstall that video card and then install the second video card... annoying to say the least.

http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/291...ed/index3.html



The Asus has a main X16 slot. It doesnt need a old switch board, it electronically switches 8 lanes to the second slot if its occupied.

2 x PCIe 2.0 x16 , support ATI CrossFireX™ technology (at one x16 or dual x8 link)

http://usa.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=vk9Pqxby9MjO0WHm

In CrossfireX both boards run in 8X/8X.
__________________
NZXT Apollo
S75QB 750W
ZEROtherm FZ120
Phenom II 720BE (X4) 3.5GHZ.
Gigabyte GA MA790X UD4P
G Skill DDR2 1066 4GB.
MSI GTS 250
Seagate 7200.12 500GB.

Welcome to the show

Last edited by StrangleHold; 11-05-2009 at 02:36 AM.
StrangleHold is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 11-05-2009, 02:43 AM   #6 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: PA
Age: 24
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
The Asus has a main X16 slot. It doesnt need a old switch board, it electronically switches 8 lanes to the second slot if its occupied.

2 x PCIe 2.0 x16 , support ATI CrossFireX™ technology (at one x16 or dual x8 link)

http://usa.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=vk9Pqxby9MjO0WHm

In CrossfireX both boards run in 8X/8X.

It says right on ASrock's site that the board does 3 way crossfire.


You also linked to a different and more expensive board than he did. It's even a 790x chipset not 785g.

http://usa.asus.com/product.aspx?P_I...rnR&templete=2

Here's the one he linked too. Crossfire on that board is 4x/4x.

Here's a like priced ASrock board ($5 cheaper actually)

http://www.asrock.com/MB/overview.as...M3A785GXH/128M
__________________
Matt
''The beatings will continue until morale improves''
Main rig-
AMD Phenom II 550 unlocked to B50 quad@3.8ghz, Antec 200 case, Gigabyte MA785GMT-UD2H board, 4gb G.Skill DDR3-1600 ram, EVGA gts250 GPU, OCZ 700w PSU, 2x dvd burners, seagate 640gb HDD 7200.11, Windows 7 RC.

Last edited by 87dtna; 11-05-2009 at 02:51 AM.
87dtna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:08 AM   #7 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87dtna View Post
It says right on ASrock's site that the board does 3 way crossfire.


You also linked to a different and more expensive board than he did. It's even a 790x chipset not 785g.

http://usa.asus.com/product.aspx?P_I...rnR&templete=2

Here's the one he linked too. Crossfire on that board is 4x/4x.

Here's a like priced ASrock board ($5 cheaper actually)

http://www.asrock.com/MB/overview.as...M3A785GXH/128M
The boards I linked to in my first post had nothing to do with C/F. It was the quality of the boards.

Somebody else brought up a link to the other Asus board.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...rd,2441-3.html
This Review does say the Asrock can be run in Tri C/F at 8x/8x/4x. But who in their right mind would pay for three cards to run in 8/8/4. its a gimmick.

I,m talking about the quality of the boards, not the little extra bells/flashing lights.

Which do you think would be better? To add a X4 slot or put a better 10 phase power setup on the board. I wonder which one is cheaper to do, Hum!

Would you rather have a ash tray that played music when opened and a air freshener on your rear view mirror. Or a better engine in your car?
__________________
NZXT Apollo
S75QB 750W
ZEROtherm FZ120
Phenom II 720BE (X4) 3.5GHZ.
Gigabyte GA MA790X UD4P
G Skill DDR2 1066 4GB.
MSI GTS 250
Seagate 7200.12 500GB.

Welcome to the show
StrangleHold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 01:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: PA
Age: 24
Posts: 658
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
The boards I linked to in my first post had nothing to do with C/F. It was the quality of the boards.

Somebody else brought up a link to the other Asus board.

I know, but the topic of posting was about comparing the best 785g board both asus and ASrock had to offer. In post 51 I quoted the board you linked too, not even being a 785g board.
BTW, I can't overclock any CPU I have better on my gigabyte board that I did with my $55 asrock board. They both hit walls at the same clocks.

Then you say all this crap about the third 16x slot on the ASRock and how I'm wrong that it's not for 3 way, when it says 3 way Xfire right on asrocks website. So whatever.
__________________
Matt
''The beatings will continue until morale improves''
Main rig-
AMD Phenom II 550 unlocked to B50 quad@3.8ghz, Antec 200 case, Gigabyte MA785GMT-UD2H board, 4gb G.Skill DDR3-1600 ram, EVGA gts250 GPU, OCZ 700w PSU, 2x dvd burners, seagate 640gb HDD 7200.11, Windows 7 RC.
87dtna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 03:21 PM   #9 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87dtna View Post
I know, but the topic of posting was about comparing the best 785g board both asus and ASrock had to offer. In post 51 I quoted the board you linked too, not even being a 785g board.
BTW, I can't overclock any CPU I have better on my gigabyte board that I did with my $55 asrock board. They both hit walls at the same clocks.

Then you say all this crap about the third 16x slot on the ASRock and how I'm wrong that it's not for 3 way, when it says 3 way Xfire right on asrocks website. So whatever.
I was talking about the two boards I linked to in post 33. In post 36 you said wrong because of the crossfire of the Asrock board. My point didnt having anything to do with if a board could do C/F or not, its the build quality of the boards.

In post 37 g25racer gave a link to the 790 asus board.

In post 49 you said the Asrock was 16/8/4.(28) lanes. In C/F the board would run 8/8/4 (20) lanes. The first two slots share lanes, the 3rd. slot gets 4 lanes from the southbridge.

The Asus has a Stand alone X16 slot. The second slot get 4 lanes from the southbridge just like the 3rd. slot on the Asrock. In C/F the Asus is 16/4 for a total of (20) lanes.

In post 53 I said I found another review that said the Asrock could do Tri C/F.

My point in all this has nothing to do with if a board can do C/F or not, which seems to be pulled that way to distract from the point. I would not buy either board for the C/F.

My point is the quality of the boards. Asrock uses lower quality PCBs and components .
__________________
NZXT Apollo
S75QB 750W
ZEROtherm FZ120
Phenom II 720BE (X4) 3.5GHZ.
Gigabyte GA MA790X UD4P
G Skill DDR2 1066 4GB.
MSI GTS 250
Seagate 7200.12 500GB.

Welcome to the show
StrangleHold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 02:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: PA
Age: 24
Posts: 658
Default

spam
__________________
Matt
''The beatings will continue until morale improves''
Main rig-
AMD Phenom II 550 unlocked to B50 quad@3.8ghz, Antec 200 case, Gigabyte MA785GMT-UD2H board, 4gb G.Skill DDR3-1600 ram, EVGA gts250 GPU, OCZ 700w PSU, 2x dvd burners, seagate 640gb HDD 7200.11, Windows 7 RC.
87dtna is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unlocking Phenom II Callisto x2 to Deneb x4 Unlockurcore CPUs and Overclocking 32 11-16-2009 11:30 PM
Phenom II 965 3.4Ghz CPU - Pricing released - Phenom II 955 Price drops Jamin43 CPUs and Overclocking 7 08-03-2009 06:26 AM
Phenom II X2 or Phenom II X3 shokwaav CPUs and Overclocking 20 07-09-2009 02:28 PM
Amd phenom X4 vs phenom II Sean89 CPUs and Overclocking 3 03-19-2009 05:19 PM
AMD Offers Glimpse of Phenom II, Overclocks It Past 5GHz Respital CPUs and Overclocking 7 11-25-2008 05:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.