ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  

Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-05-2009, 08:46 AM   #1 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Motoxrdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nor Cal
Age: 19
Posts: 7,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g25racer View Post
Your like talking to a brick wall LOL J/k

I am basically saying that an OS cant fully utilize every part of a quad core

I am NOT saying that Windows uses 100%


Edit: Why wouldnt you want an OS/Games to utilize all of the proc? The more it can use the more you got for your money.
That's like saying a disk defrager can't use 100% of your video card, lol.
__________________
Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me videre?
Motoxrdude is online now   Reply With Quote


Old 11-05-2009, 05:02 AM   #2 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
ganzey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: belvidere, Illinois
Age: 16
Posts: 668
Default

what im tryin to say is that wouldnt it be better for an os to only use like 5% so that you have 95% left for apps?
__________________
When I walk through the shadow of the valley of death
I will fear no evil, cause I'm the biggest son of a b*tch in the Valley
ganzey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
G25r8cer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Zeeland, MI
Posts: 4,810
Default

Yes it would but, you are still stuck on the fact that you think im talking about it actually using 100%. When, I am saying that it should have the ability to use 100%

NVM Can someone else explain it to him? He's a tough cookie to crack
__________________
My Rig
Antec 300 w/Scyth Kaze Master
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Phenom II 955BE w/ CoolerMaster V8
2 x 2gb Gskill DDR3 1600mhz
Ultra X-Finity 600watt psu
Samsung F3 500gb and F1 750gb
XFX 8600gt XXX will be 5850 soon
Logitech G25, Illuminated, and MX Revo

Team Stats FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND F@H Team 44358
G25r8cer is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:07 AM   #4 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
ganzey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: belvidere, Illinois
Age: 16
Posts: 668
Default

oh ok, i thought u meant it would be good for windows to use 100% and im really tired. night everyone
__________________
When I walk through the shadow of the valley of death
I will fear no evil, cause I'm the biggest son of a b*tch in the Valley
ganzey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:43 AM   #5 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Gooberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Hastings, Michigan
Age: 17
Posts: 1,413
Default

Yeah, ganzey was totally thinking about CPU usage
__________________
Compaq Presario SR5130NX
AMD Athlon 64 x2 3800+ 2.01 GHz
2GB DDR2 667 MHz
Evga GeForce 8500GT
22" Acer monitor
Asus MB (don't know what one :) )
200 GB HDD
Windows 7 Professional
250W PSU probably made by chinese workers making like a couple dollars a week
Gooberman is online now   Reply With Quote


Old 11-05-2009, 06:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
THERMAL-REACTOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Niagara Falls, Canada
Posts: 672
Default

Not really iimpressed with this. First it has 2 less threads than an i7 so it's behind already and when the i9 with it's 12 threads comes out AMD will really be lagging behind.
__________________
Intel Core i7 920 @ 4.2GHZ
Asus P6T Deluxe
12Gb Patriot Viper DDR3 1600
Radeon HD4870X2
4 WD RE2 500GB (4 in Raid 0, 280mb/s read)
Corsair HX1000W
Antec 1200
Samsung 46" 1080P LCD
PIC'S : THERMAL-REACTOR
THERMAL-REACTOR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 08:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: PA
Age: 24
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THERMAL-REACTOR View Post
Not really iimpressed with this. First it has 2 less threads than an i7 so it's behind already and when the i9 with it's 12 threads comes out AMD will really be lagging behind.
Ehh, if eventually some apps actually utilize 6 cores I think it will be better to have 6 cores/thread than 8 threads w/only 4 cores.

The Thuban is a Phenom II with basically just 2 extra cores stuck on there, so it should be an AM3 processor and hopefully it will only require a Bios update on AM3/AM2+ boards to run one. Bulldozer will probably be a completely different socket, but who knows.
__________________
Matt
''The beatings will continue until morale improves''
Main rig-
AMD Phenom II 550 unlocked to B50 quad@3.8ghz, Antec 200 case, Gigabyte MA785GMT-UD2H board, 4gb G.Skill DDR3-1600 ram, EVGA gts250 GPU, OCZ 700w PSU, 2x dvd burners, seagate 640gb HDD 7200.11, Windows 7 RC.

Last edited by 87dtna; 11-05-2009 at 08:55 PM.
87dtna is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by THERMAL-REACTOR View Post
Not really iimpressed with this. First it has 2 less threads than an i7 so it's behind already and when the i9 with it's 12 threads comes out AMD will really be lagging behind.
This processor was never meant to compete with those. AMD is just releasing it just to say they have a X6. Its nothing but a Deneb with 6 cores.

AMD is not going to try to compete with the i series till Bulldozer is released. Brand new architecture at 32nm.
__________________
NZXT Apollo
S75QB 750W
ZEROtherm FZ120
Phenom II 720BE (X4) 3.5GHZ.
Gigabyte GA MA790X UD4P
G Skill DDR2 1066 4GB.
MSI GTS 250
Seagate 7200.12 500GB.

Welcome to the show
StrangleHold is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 12:12 AM   #9 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: PA
Age: 24
Posts: 657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
Its nothing but a Deneb with 6 cores.
yup. IMO it's gonna be a waste of money for anyone to buy it.
__________________
Matt
''The beatings will continue until morale improves''
Main rig-
AMD Phenom II 550 unlocked to B50 quad@3.8ghz, Antec 200 case, Gigabyte MA785GMT-UD2H board, 4gb G.Skill DDR3-1600 ram, EVGA gts250 GPU, OCZ 700w PSU, 2x dvd burners, seagate 640gb HDD 7200.11, Windows 7 RC.
87dtna is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:38 AM   #10 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mainland United States
Posts: 2,293
Default

I am for cores that have more processing power versus more cores on a processor. Most software just is not programmed to utilize more and more cores.
__________________
"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters." -- Benjamin Franklin

Operating Systems: Linux Ubuntu 9.04 and Windows Vista
Power Supply: OCZ StealthXStream OCZ600SXS
Video Card: MSI R3650-T2D512 OC Radeon HD 3650
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M78SM-S2H
Memory: Super Talent PC2-6400 2 gigabytes
Processor: Phenom 9550 Quad-Core (2.2 gigahertz)
2048Megabytes is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Phenom II VS. Intel Core i5 jonathanx54 CPUs and Overclocking 29 10-07-2009 01:28 PM
Amd phenom X4 vs phenom II Sean89 CPUs and Overclocking 3 03-19-2009 05:19 PM
AMD Offers Glimpse of Phenom II, Overclocks It Past 5GHz Respital CPUs and Overclocking 7 11-25-2008 05:22 AM
AMD Phenom and Everest speedyink CPUs and Overclocking 0 04-11-2008 12:32 AM
Heatsink for AMD Phenom 9600 match??? TJoshX Computer Cases, Power Supplies and Cooling 3 03-23-2008 09:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.