ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  

Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Software > Operating Systems

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-09-2009, 01:48 AM   #11 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Default

so what can i LEGALLY do? can i install a mac os on computer with a AMD processor?
richamc01 is offline  


Old 11-09-2009, 04:16 AM   #12 (permalink)
/\E
Platinum Member
 
/\E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: /root/ae
Age: 19
Posts: 650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by richamc01 View Post
so what can i LEGALLY do? can i install a mac os on computer with a AMD processor?
Not legally. It's against Apple's EULA, therefore it is illegal.

If you'd Google a bit, I am sure you would find plenty of information.
__________________
<--Web Developer Here.
/\E is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:11 PM   #13 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by /\E View Post
Not legally. It's against Apple's EULA, therefore it is illegal.

If you'd Google a bit, I am sure you would find plenty of information.
EULA's aren't laws. This is a mistake everyone seems to make with all sorts of software. I could generate some software and write in the EULA, "by using this software you hereby give me possession of your house, your car, all your money, and your first born child" and it would hold zero legal ground. The legality is a gray area. Apple is trying to say that Pystar is infringing on their copyright because it has to copy apple software to RAM, and their argument is that it's a pirated copy. That is a very ridiculous argument since that would mean every time you boot OSX on an apple machine you are making a second pirate copy (one in RAM, one on hard drive). Hackintosh machines I believe can be legal if you own a mac, but otherwise aren't. And if you do make one, don't expect support from apple or from third party software/hardware manufacturers. You'll be stuck searching for solutions in forums for hours, trust me.
__________________
My general cleaning guide: www.thegreatdamorian.com/howtos/fixit.html
A few tips on computer building: http://www.thegreatdamorian.com/howtos/diycomptips.html
Damorian is offline  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:19 PM   #14 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
tlarkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 12,103
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damorian View Post
EULA's aren't laws. This is a mistake everyone seems to make with all sorts of software. I could generate some software and write in the EULA, "by using this software you hereby give me possession of your house, your car, all your money, and your first born child" and it would hold zero legal ground. The legality is a gray area. Apple is trying to say that Pystar is infringing on their copyright because it has to copy apple software to RAM, and their argument is that it's a pirated copy. That is a very ridiculous argument since that would mean every time you boot OSX on an apple machine you are making a second pirate copy (one in RAM, one on hard drive). Hackintosh machines I believe can be legal if you own a mac, but otherwise aren't. And if you do make one, don't expect support from apple or from third party software/hardware manufacturers. You'll be stuck searching for solutions in forums for hours, trust me.

No Psystar or whatever is breaking the law. You see Apple uses what is called a TPM, which is a method of verifying you are running Apple branded hardware. To load OS X on a non Apple hardware computer you are in a sense "hacking" around the TPM.

While, it can be interpreted as a gray area, it is still for the most part considered illegal. It is chopped up to the same methods people use to remove DRM from media.
__________________
Typical Signature:
Computer Specs: - numbers I read off a box | parts I assembled in a case all by myself | benchmark score

"Will the man with telekenesis please raise my hand?" - Vonnegut

chown -R us /.base

Get a grep!
tlarkin is offline  
Old 11-10-2009, 02:29 AM   #15 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlarkin View Post
No Psystar or whatever is breaking the law. You see Apple uses what is called a TPM, which is a method of verifying you are running Apple branded hardware. To load OS X on a non Apple hardware computer you are in a sense "hacking" around the TPM.

While, it can be interpreted as a gray area, it is still for the most part considered illegal. It is chopped up to the same methods people use to remove DRM from media.
"Apple wants Psystar to be found guilty of copyright infringement and for violating the DMCA."

Taken from this article: http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/09...o-avoid-trial/

I see nothing wrong with hacking around TPM. This is my personal belief though. Bear in mind that Pystar isn't the only way to get OS X on a PC. If you feel it is morally incorrect, don't do it.

If you're concerned about the legality of hackintoshs, read here: http://www.applematters.com/article/...oshes-illegal/

And here's some more info on pystar/hackintosh in general legalities/moralities: http://www.osnews.com/story/21104/Wh..._Psystar_Case_

EDIT: Also, even if you do make a hackintosh. They're not going to know about it (unless you try and update it and such) and even if they do, they're not going to press charges against you because it's not within their financial interests.
__________________
My general cleaning guide: www.thegreatdamorian.com/howtos/fixit.html
A few tips on computer building: http://www.thegreatdamorian.com/howtos/diycomptips.html

Last edited by Damorian; 11-10-2009 at 02:34 AM.
Damorian is offline  


Old 11-10-2009, 03:42 AM   #16 (permalink)
/\E
Platinum Member
 
/\E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: /root/ae
Age: 19
Posts: 650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damorian View Post
EULA's aren't laws. This is a mistake everyone seems to make with all sorts of software. I could generate some software and write in the EULA, "by using this software you hereby give me possession of your house, your car, all your money, and your first born child" and it would hold zero legal ground. The legality is a gray area. Apple is trying to say that Pystar is infringing on their copyright because it has to copy apple software to RAM, and their argument is that it's a pirated copy. That is a very ridiculous argument since that would mean every time you boot OSX on an apple machine you are making a second pirate copy (one in RAM, one on hard drive). Hackintosh machines I believe can be legal if you own a mac, but otherwise aren't. And if you do make one, don't expect support from apple or from third party software/hardware manufacturers. You'll be stuck searching for solutions in forums for hours, trust me.
Yeah, but you're in violation of the EULA either way. And since it's in violation, it's not to be discussed on the forum. That's all I am trying to get across.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damorian View Post
"Apple wants Psystar to be found guilty of copyright infringement and for violating the DMCA."

Taken from this article: http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/10/09...o-avoid-trial/

I see nothing wrong with hacking around TPM. This is my personal belief though. Bear in mind that Pystar isn't the only way to get OS X on a PC. If you feel it is morally incorrect, don't do it.

If you're concerned about the legality of hackintoshs, read here: http://www.applematters.com/article/...oshes-illegal/

And here's some more info on pystar/hackintosh in general legalities/moralities: http://www.osnews.com/story/21104/Wh..._Psystar_Case_

EDIT: Also, even if you do make a hackintosh. They're not going to know about it (unless you try and update it and such) and even if they do, they're not going to press charges against you because it's not within their financial interests.
Yeah, nobody's going to know about it nor are they going to care. And you're pushing for a Mac vs. PC argument in this thread. I am not debating the outside legalities. I am just saying that it cannot be discussed on this forum without problems.

I have used OSx86 before, any idiot can do it with a little searching.
__________________
<--Web Developer Here.
/\E is offline  
Old 11-10-2009, 03:58 AM   #17 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 116
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by /\E View Post
Yeah, but you're in violation of the EULA either way. And since it's in violation, it's not to be discussed on the forum. That's all I am trying to get across.



Yeah, nobody's going to know about it nor are they going to care. And you're pushing for a Mac vs. PC argument in this thread. I am not debating the outside legalities. I am just saying that it cannot be discussed on this forum without problems.

I have used OSx86 before, any idiot can do it with a little searching.
I don't think I'm pushing for a Mac vs PC argument at all. I am well aware of that which is why I haven't (nor anybody else) given any info. I just don't want the OP to be misled.
__________________
My general cleaning guide: www.thegreatdamorian.com/howtos/fixit.html
A few tips on computer building: http://www.thegreatdamorian.com/howtos/diycomptips.html

Last edited by Damorian; 11-10-2009 at 04:00 AM. Reason: Grammar
Damorian is offline  
Old 11-10-2009, 02:35 PM   #18 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Default

i wasn't trying to start some legal dispute here. i wasn't aware that i needed to have apple based components to do this. ill just stick with windows or buy a mac sometime.

thanks.
richamc01 is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 01:08 AM   #19 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
PohTayToez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois
Age: 21
Posts: 3,878
Default

Well, if anyone is interested, it's officially illegal:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/18221...nl_dnx_h_crawl
PohTayToez is offline  
Old 11-17-2009, 01:19 AM   #20 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PohTayToez View Post
Well, technically the legality of it has yet to be decided. While it's definitely against Apple's software license, there is currently a court case between Apple and Psystar determining if Apple even has the right to tell users what computers they can use their software.
Yeah... If it was up to me I would say no. My Acura dealer can't sue me for painting my car. Sony can't tell me where to put my new TV. I don't get it... how do software/hardware companies get away with telling us that we can't alter or mod what we buy, when we buy it? When you buy something, it's yours. You can't expect Apple to back you up when your system crashes because you decided to homebrew your system, but you should be able to do it anyways. Forget the bulls**t that says they're technically leasing their software to us. It's on a physical disk, and it's physically installed. You pay a one-time fee to use it, and that's it. It's not like a rental car where you take it back if you don't make a payment, it's an item.

Sorry for the rant but it makes me pretty upset.
jmusick is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
mac, mac os, snow leopard, switching os, windows

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2010 Computer Forum - Web Design Forum