ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Laptop and Smartphones

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2005, 09:02 PM   #1 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6
Default Celeron 370 M 1.5 GHz Vs. Sempron M 2800+

Hi, new to the world of notebook computers and I saw what I feel is a great deal on a Acer notebook with a Celeron M 370 1.5 GHz processor also saw basically the same notebook but with a slightly smaller screen and hard drive and a AMD Sempron M 2800+ Wondering if someone could explain to this newbie the differences between these two processors. And isn’t it true that both of these budget processors have less L2 cache then the more expensive processors. And are there any heat problems associated with either one of these processors. Thanks

Tcj

Last edited by Curt31; 09-19-2005 at 09:04 PM.
Curt31 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 09-19-2005, 09:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
formerly liuliuboy
 
diduknowthat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 18
Posts: 6,658
Default

well since they are most mobile processors there shouldn't be much heat issues (please correct me if i'm wrong i dono that much about mobile processors). I think i read in another forum that the Celeron M is better but maybe you'll want someone else to confirm that.
__________________
Silent Mini-Rig
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
4GB G.Skill DDR2 800 Memory | 400GB WD SATA HD
eVGA 8800GT 512mb Graphics Card
X-Fi Xtrememusic Sound Card
Asus Combo ATSC TV Tuner
Scythe Ninja | AC Accelero S1 Passive heatsink
Cooler Master Elite 340 mATX Case
diduknowthat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 09:36 PM   #3 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
Default

well, the semprons are really nice processors, even though there not as good as the ahtlon 64, but it is much better then the celeron, at pretty much everything (especially gaming).
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 09:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Advitiya Saxena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: INDIA
Age: 27
Posts: 180
Default

dont ever buy a celeron....
__________________
Toshiba Qosmio F20
Intel Centrino Tech. 1.74 Ghz
1 GB DDR RAM PC4200 533Mhz
Nvidia 6600
80 GB HDD
Super Drive DVD R/Rw
Windows Media Centre
Microsoft MiniMouse
Sony DAV DZ120 5.1 Home theater
Advitiya Saxena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2005, 10:22 PM   #5 (permalink)
Lax
Moderator
 
Lax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Snow country
Age: 22
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
dont ever buy a celeron....
I own one and it works great.
Quote:
Hi, new to the world of notebook computers and I saw what I feel is a great deal on a Acer notebook with a Celeron M 370 1.5 GHz processor also saw basically the same notebook but with a slightly smaller screen and hard drive and a AMD Sempron M 2800+ Wondering if someone could explain to this newbie the differences between these two processors. And isn’t it true that both of these budget processors have less L2 cache then the more expensive processors.
Buy it if you don't plan on gaming at all (since it's the same price as the sempron I'm guessing but with the bigger screen and HDD). If you will be doing some gaming your best bet would be the Sempron (but a new Pm/D or A64 mobile chip would be best). As for heat problems, it's a laptop, so long as it has good cooling it should be ok (I don't know specifically if either of them do or don't have heat problems).
__________________
He who controls the present controls the past.
He who controls the past, controls the future.
Lax is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 09-20-2005, 05:10 AM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Curt31
Hi, new to the world of notebook computers and I saw what I feel is a great deal on a Acer notebook with a Celeron M 370 1.5 GHz processor also saw basically the same notebook but with a slightly smaller screen and hard drive and a AMD Sempron M 2800+ Wondering if someone could explain to this newbie the differences between these two processors. And isn’t it true that both of these budget processors have less L2 cache then the more expensive processors. And are there any heat problems associated with either one of these processors. Thanks

Tcj
a celeron or sempron would be sufficient in performing most tasks besides gaming. however, i would suggest spending a little more for a pentium M or an amd turion.
alanuofm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 07:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
spamdos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canberra Australia
Age: 19
Posts: 1,160
Default

i bought a celeron once and almost threw it out the window. are u sure that this is a good deal. you never know but u might be able to find a better deal. oh year i would upgrade to the pentium m they are much better than the celeron m
spamdos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 07:59 PM   #8 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Advitiya Saxena's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: INDIA
Age: 27
Posts: 180
Default

1. Celeron are the processor which are in some way defected during manufacturing, and intel had opened this secret after P4 luanch.

2. They are crap processor,u may just work with MS office applications.

3. Online experience will be horrible n dont think of gaming.

4.And those of u who own one, buy a new system n then tell me.
__________________
Toshiba Qosmio F20
Intel Centrino Tech. 1.74 Ghz
1 GB DDR RAM PC4200 533Mhz
Nvidia 6600
80 GB HDD
Super Drive DVD R/Rw
Windows Media Centre
Microsoft MiniMouse
Sony DAV DZ120 5.1 Home theater
Advitiya Saxena is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 08:44 PM   #9 (permalink)
Lax
Moderator
 
Lax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Snow country
Age: 22
Posts: 2,302
Default

Quote:
1. Celeron are the processor which are in some way defected during manufacturing, and intel had opened this secret after P4 luanch.

2. They are crap processor,u may just work with MS office applications.

3. Online experience will be horrible n dont think of gaming.

4.And those of u who own one, buy a new system n then tell me.
1. How can I put this........you're wrong
2. They are made for cost, not prefromance
3. I game with my 2.4Ghz celeron fine
4. I own a 3.2Ghz Northwood P4, 2.6Ghz Northwood P4 and am getting a 3200+ Venice, what do you want me to tell you? I love my celeron?
__________________
He who controls the present controls the past.
He who controls the past, controls the future.
Lax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2005, 10:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6
Talking Celeron vs. Pentium M 725

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord AnthraX
1. How can I put this........you're wrong
2. They are made for cost, not prefromance
3. I game with my 2.4Ghz celeron fine
4. I own a 3.2Ghz Northwood P4, 2.6Ghz Northwood P4 and am getting a 3200+ Venice, what do you want me to tell you? I love my celeron?
Hi thanks guys for all the help, Say Anthrax so you feel it would be find for just word processing web surfing ect? 1.5 GHz Cel M370. I know yours is a 2.4, And how much of a performance boost would I see if I moved up to a Pentium M 725, just might be able to squeak out a little more money. If so would I really notice a difference in word-processing web performance spreadsheets stuff like that I won’t be doing any gamming I have a desktop for that. Last thing what’s the actual difference between the Celeron and the Pentium M is it the L2 cache on the chip? Thanks again!!

Tcj
Curt31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum