|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Age: 17
Posts: 1,150
|
I use Avast, it is relatively quick to load and seems to protect from viruses, automatically updates and has live protection. But i haven't ever used AVG
__________________
My PC: Core2Duo E6300 @ 1.86 Ghz, Asus P5v-VM DH , 200 GB Maxtor SATA ,2GB (2*1GB Kingston DDRII), Radeon x1650 Graphics (256 mb), 2* Acer 17 inch TFT's, Windows Vista Home Premium Server: AMD Athlon XP 2800+ 256 Mb Ram, 8Gb IDE for o/s, 2 * 250GB SATAII for storage, Ubuntu Server 7.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Moderator - F@H Guru
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Czech Republic
Age: 23
Posts: 4,009
|
I have used both and prefer Avast! However, AVG is a good choice as well. I would simply get both and try which suits you best. I find AVG loads up faster actually. However, I prefer the way that Avast! looks. Up o you I say.
JAN
__________________
A64 3700+ @ 2.65Ghz ::: 7300GT @ 600/1500 ::: 2GB RAM @ 440Mhz www.CZ3RT.com ::: FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND ::: F@H Team 44358 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 180
|
I think Avast is better but I use AVG because Avast isn't compatable with Zonelabs. AVG isn't bad.
__________________
New HP dv9000t Laptop: Genuine Windows XP Professional Intel(R) Core(TM) 2 Duo processor T7200 (2.0 GHz) 17.0" WSXGA+ BrightView Widescreen (1680x1050) 512MB NVIDIA(R) GeForce(R) Go 7600 2.0GB DDR2 SDRAM (2x1024MB) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|