ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Software > Operating Systems

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2004, 11:44 PM   #11 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
4W4K3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Age: 20
Posts: 6,848
Default

dont just make it look like 2000, you gotta stop all those behind the scenes worthless processes. they hog your memory.
__________________
My Computer
I choose to believe what I was programmed to believe.
Can I eat your brain?
FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358
4W4K3 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-04-2004, 01:58 AM   #12 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
hello45044's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 135
Default

You shoud REALLY stick with 2000.
Windows ME is BAD.
It's allmost exactly the same as Win 98, which is also bad.
hello45044 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2004, 02:49 AM   #13 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
4W4K3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Age: 20
Posts: 6,848
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hello45044
You shoud REALLY stick with 2000.
Windows ME is BAD.
It's allmost exactly the same as Win 98, which is also bad.
lol yes ME is terrible, even XP home is better...and i hate home edition.
__________________
My Computer
I choose to believe what I was programmed to believe.
Can I eat your brain?
FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358
4W4K3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2004, 06:38 AM   #14 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Lorand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bucharest
Age: 41
Posts: 3,042
Default

ME is the worst Windows ever... But 98 is quite ok for older computers.
Lorand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2004, 12:03 PM   #15 (permalink)
Moderator
 
ZER0X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 1,414
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorand
ME is the worst Windows ever... But 98 is quite ok for older computers.
Yes 98 was a good OS.....I dont know what it was but I like 95 better than 98 Dunno why just prefered it, it's also the same as I like 2000 better than XP I think it's because they were more plain and simple I dont really like all the fancy stuff
__________________
AMD X2 4000+ Socket AM2
2Gb RAM DDR2 667 Dual Channel
160Gb ATA100 8mb
ATI Radeon 3870HD PCI-E 512mb
ZER0X is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 10-04-2004, 12:11 PM   #16 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Lorand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bucharest
Age: 41
Posts: 3,042
Default

And in XP is quite complicated to get rid of those useless fancy thingys...
Lorand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2004, 06:55 AM   #17 (permalink)
Moderator
 
ZER0X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 18
Posts: 1,414
Default

I'd want xp to use more CPU then RAM because my computer lacks RAM and has a good CPU
__________________
AMD X2 4000+ Socket AM2
2Gb RAM DDR2 667 Dual Channel
160Gb ATA100 8mb
ATI Radeon 3870HD PCI-E 512mb
ZER0X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2004, 03:35 PM   #18 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 24
Posts: 19,946
Default

Quote:
And in XP is quite complicated to get rid of those useless fancy thingys...
1. No it isnt.
2. Thats what W2K3 is for
__________________
ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, Q6600@3.7 / ASUS P5ND, E6400@3.8
4GB OCz Platinum XTC 8500 / 4GB CorsairXMS2 6400
5x500GB Seagate 7200.10 / 2x500 Seagate 7200.10
OCz 8800GTX 768MB @ 630/800 / 2x Galaxy 8800GT SLI
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum