|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 13
|
Hello, I was just wondering what you though of these images, taken with A Kodak CX7330 (Specs Below) But I thought that the images were of a considerable quality for a 3.1 mp Compact. Anyhow, here are the images:
A portrait: http://img390.imageshack.us/my.php?i...ainymod1xk.jpg A Landscape: http://img390.imageshack.us/my.php?i...70290918eb.jpg A Macro Shot: http://img390.imageshack.us/my.php?image=10000832pq.jpg CCD resolution 1/2.7 inch type (3.3 M total pixels) Image resolution 3.1MP(2032x1524 pixels) Picture quality 3.1 MP -- best (prints up to 11x14) 2.8 MP -- best 3:2 (optimized ratio for 4x6 prints) 2.1 MP -- better (small prints) 1.1 MP -- good (email) Zoom 3X optical zoom -- 5.6-16.8 mm (35 mm equivalent: 37-111 mm) 3.3X digital zoom 10X total zoom Aperture f/2.7-5.2 (wide), f4.6-8.7 (tele) Shutter speed 1/2 - 1/1400 seconds Viewfinder real image optical viewfinder Display 1.6" (4 cm) TFT indoor/outdoor color display Please feel free to comment on the images or the camera and questions will be answered if wanted. Thanks a lot Jon3782001
__________________
There are 10 types of people in this world - Those who can count in binary and those who can't. Photoshop Freak!! HP Pavilion 710 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: THOJhakk county
Posts: 3,635
|
pictures are pretty good. how much did you get it for? i was recently shopping for digital cameras, and that one was one of the "almost bought" one on my list.
__________________
"Remember, wrong advice may be worse than no advice at all." ::COMPUTERHAKK::: |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|