|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 205
|
im thinking of using a 64bit chip when I build my new computer because i heard that they're faster or something but what I need to know is if the 64bit chip will run in any motherboard or do I have to buy a motherboard specifficaly to support 64bit. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,215
|
Any motherboard where the CPU fits it will run because when 64bit CPUs came out they brought a new socket with them (with the exception of the P4F but I don't think you will find one of those).
__________________
You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here. I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D: www.ctrlaltdel-online.com www.userfriendly.org |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,630
|
yea Athlon 64 or intel EM64T?
if it is AMD then you need a 754 or 939 socket. also, they sell $60 semprons that support 64 bit. i suggest athlon 64 though. also, 939 socket will be more upgradeable so get a 939 socket if its in your budget. if its EM64T then it sucks. |
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Age: 17
Posts: 1,383
|
Quote:
__________________
Athlon 64 3000+ Venice -- MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
Asus nVidia GeForce 6600 -- Corsair ValueSelect 1024mb Seagate 120GB Barracuda -- Xoxide X-Clear Case FOR SALE http://www.computerforum.com/47630-fs-a64-3000-6600-1gb-ram-w-stuff.html http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=mzvideos |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 30
Posts: 2,954
|
What's with this ridiculus fanboyism.
Making such statements without backing it up with facts simply shows how knowledgeable they are.
__________________
Last edited by tweaker; 12-06-2005 at 11:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 19
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 30
Posts: 2,954
|
Quote:
Quote:
Personally I like (and own) both Intel and AMD, for the record.
__________________
Last edited by tweaker; 12-07-2005 at 09:55 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 19
Posts: 49
|
Quote:
$1059 - Pentium 4EE 3.73ghz $995 - Athlon 64 FX-57 Can you answer to that? http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/06/...fx/page12.html "It is not particularly surprising to see the Athlon 64 FX-57 outperform its single core competitors. The 2.8 GHz part is even powerful enough to compete with fast Intel Pentium 4 processors in their best areas, such as video or audio encoding or rendering tasks." Now I know it's comparing against a 3.6GHz P4, which is slower than the 3.73 EE, but the performance increase with the EE would still not be able to match AMD. Last edited by clkProject; 12-08-2005 at 10:06 PM. Reason: Making my post more ownage |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,215
|
wow $60 difference. If you are in the market for those processors that means nothing to you. Sure AMD wins in benchmarks but realistically you usually will not see any difference
__________________
You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here. I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D: www.ctrlaltdel-online.com www.userfriendly.org |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|