ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2005, 04:23 AM   #1 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 205
Default 64bit cpu's

im thinking of using a 64bit chip when I build my new computer because i heard that they're faster or something but what I need to know is if the 64bit chip will run in any motherboard or do I have to buy a motherboard specifficaly to support 64bit. thanks.
childsy_1985 is offline  


Old 12-06-2005, 05:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cromewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,215
Default

Any motherboard where the CPU fits it will run because when 64bit CPUs came out they brought a new socket with them (with the exception of the P4F but I don't think you will find one of those).
__________________

You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here.

I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D:
www.ctrlaltdel-online.com
www.userfriendly.org
Cromewell is offline  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:08 PM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,630
Default

yea Athlon 64 or intel EM64T?
if it is AMD then you need a 754 or 939 socket. also, they sell $60 semprons that support 64 bit. i suggest athlon 64 though. also, 939 socket will be more upgradeable so get a 939 socket if its in your budget.
if its EM64T then it sucks.
fade2green514 is offline  
Old 12-06-2005, 10:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
TheChef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New York
Age: 17
Posts: 1,383
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fade2green514
if its EM64T then it sucks.
Any reason behind that?
__________________
Athlon 64 3000+ Venice -- MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum
Asus nVidia GeForce 6600 -- Corsair ValueSelect 1024mb
Seagate 120GB Barracuda -- Xoxide X-Clear Case
FOR SALE

http://www.computerforum.com/47630-fs-a64-3000-6600-1gb-ram-w-stuff.html
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=mzvideos
TheChef is offline  
Old 12-06-2005, 11:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 19
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChef
Any reason behind that?
Because it's Intel.
clkProject is offline  


Old 12-06-2005, 11:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
tweaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 30
Posts: 2,954
Default

What's with this ridiculus fanboyism.

Making such statements without backing it up with facts simply shows how knowledgeable they are.
__________________

Last edited by tweaker; 12-06-2005 at 11:40 PM.
tweaker is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 08:56 PM   #7 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 19
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tweaker
What's with this ridiculus fanboyism.

Making such statements without backing it up with facts simply shows how knowledgeable they are.
Do we really need facts for the obvious? AMD has been the performance king for quite a few months now.
clkProject is offline  
Old 12-07-2005, 09:22 PM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
tweaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 30
Posts: 2,954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by clkProject
Do we really need facts for the obvious?
Fanboyism like above is plain stupid and nobody around here likes it.

Quote:
AMD has been the performance king for quite a few months now.
Maybe, but when you bring price into the calculation AMD isn't always the obvious choise. Besides, when you need benchmarks (some who can be questioned) to tell a difference, AMD's superiority is even more undermined. Most people won't be able to tell a real world difference in their everyday tasks anyway. AMD doesn't excel in every task there is so let's hold of with the performance king crowning shall we.

Personally I like (and own) both Intel and AMD, for the record.
__________________

Last edited by tweaker; 12-07-2005 at 09:55 PM.
tweaker is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 10:04 PM   #9 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Age: 19
Posts: 49
Default

Quote:
Maybe, but when you bring price into the calculation AMD isn't always the obvious choise. Besides, when you need benchmarks (some who can be questioned) to tell a difference, AMD's superiority is even more undermined.
Yeah, ok.

$1059 - Pentium 4EE 3.73ghz
$995 - Athlon 64 FX-57

Can you answer to that?

http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/06/...fx/page12.html

"It is not particularly surprising to see the Athlon 64 FX-57 outperform its single core competitors. The 2.8 GHz part is even powerful enough to compete with fast Intel Pentium 4 processors in their best areas, such as video or audio encoding or rendering tasks."

Now I know it's comparing against a 3.6GHz P4, which is slower than the 3.73 EE, but the performance increase with the EE would still not be able to match AMD.

Last edited by clkProject; 12-08-2005 at 10:06 PM. Reason: Making my post more ownage
clkProject is offline  
Old 12-08-2005, 10:31 PM   #10 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cromewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,215
Default

wow $60 difference. If you are in the market for those processors that means nothing to you. Sure AMD wins in benchmarks but realistically you usually will not see any difference
__________________

You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here.

I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D:
www.ctrlaltdel-online.com
www.userfriendly.org
Cromewell is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum