new cd

yoonephy · 12-12-2005, 10:20 PM

the new intel celeron d has a build in 512KB of cache, and made by 65 nano tech. i heard the performance kicks a**

fade2green514 · 12-14-2005, 01:35 AM

wrong, its called celeron for a reason. its like athlon 64 vs. pentium 4... athlon 64 performs better with lower frequencys.... celeron at a high frequency still wont perform that great. i guess 65nm will be overclockable but heat isnt always the only problem, and CPU heat specifically isnt always the problem.

generally it wont do that well... compared to a performance built processor like pentium 4 or better (namely athlon 64

)

tweaker · 12-14-2005, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fade2green514

wrong, its called celeron for a reason. its like athlon 64 vs. pentium 4... athlon 64 performs better with lower frequencys.... celeron at a high frequency still wont perform that great. i guess 65nm will be overclockable but heat isnt always the only problem, and CPU heat specifically isnt always the problem.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fade2green514

generally it wont do that well... compared to a performance built processor like pentium 4 or better (namely athlon 64

)

Huh is that a clever comparison in your opinion? It's like comparing the Sempron to the A64 or P4.

True they are called Celeron & Semprons for a reason, they are both budget chips.

12-12-2005, 10:20 PM	#1 (permalink)
yoonephy New Member Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Toronto Posts: 6	new cd the new intel celeron d has a build in 512KB of cache, and made by 65 nano tech. i heard the performance kicks a** __________________ 3Dmark2005 score:1500:( super pi 1M score:37 :D pcmark2005 score:4500:cool:

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

12-14-2005, 01:35 AM	#2 (permalink)
fade2green514 Diamond Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: buffalo ny Age: 19 Posts: 3,623	wrong, its called celeron for a reason. its like athlon 64 vs. pentium 4... athlon 64 performs better with lower frequencys.... celeron at a high frequency still wont perform that great. i guess 65nm will be overclockable but heat isnt always the only problem, and CPU heat specifically isnt always the problem. generally it wont do that well... compared to a performance built processor like pentium 4 or better (namely athlon 64 )