ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  

Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > Computer Memory and Hard Drives

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-21-2005, 06:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 36
Default is a ultra ata/100 my only choice

i have a seagate ultra ata/100 drive that is 7200 rpm and 2mb buffer memory. I want to get another drive that is around the same size but has 16mb buffer memory and is also 7200rpm and use that as my os drive and then use the old one as a slave drive. now if i have a ata/100 does that mean that i can only get ata/100 or could i go ata/133(not really sure if there is a benifit to that)
Merky Works is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-21-2005, 07:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 36
Default

nevermind I just found out that i only have a ata-100 motherboard so 133 wont be accepted
Merky Works is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 07:56 PM   #3 (permalink)
P.I Dragon
 
dragon2309's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KENT, UK
Age: 21
Posts: 8,735
Default

it would be accepeted but the speed would be capped, it would work pereclty fine, just at ATA100
__________________
Intel Core2Duo E6600 @ 3.1Ghz - (__CPU__)
eVGA 680i SLi - (__MOB__)
4Gb Corsair Dominator DDR2-800 (4x1024Mb) - (__RAM__)
250Gb Western Digital SATAII 7200rpm - (__HDD__)
nVidia BFG 8800GTS OC 320Mb - (__GFX__)
LG DVD+/-RW 18x DVD-RAM - (__OPT__)
Triple Boot - [XP Pro] + [Vista Ultimate] + [Ubuntu 7.10] - (__OS__)

[3DMARK'03 :: 25,587] --- [3DMARK'05 :: 13,989] --- [3DMARK'06 :: 8791] - (__BENCHMARKS__)


dragon2309.co.uk - a little slice of geek

dragon2309 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 08:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
The_Other_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lexington, NC
Age: 25
Posts: 13,422
Default

Yup... Besides, most drives only sustain speeds of around ATA100. My Raptors get 216Mbps in the raid, so that's basically 108 per drive...
__________________
Primary- i7 920 | 6GB RAM | 9800GT | 160+160+500GB
Secondary- Athlon X2 4200 | 2GB RAM | 7600GT | 80+250GB
Netbook - Atom N280 | 2GB RAM | GMA945| 160GB
The_Other_One is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2005, 01:07 AM   #5 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 36
Default

so even if i had a mobo that could handle ata-133 i would not even be useing all of the "bandwidth".

so then looking at newegg it seems that ata-100 hd only have 8mb cache and ata-133 hd can go up to 16mb cache. from reading the hd 101 thread i would like to have 16mb cache as it will be quicker to load programs, now if i only have a mobo that is ata-100 capable does that mean the 16 mb cache is not going to be fully used as well?
Merky Works is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-22-2005, 01:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
StrangleHold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 11,178
Default

The cache will still be 16mbs, it will just run at ATA-100 speed
__________________
NZXT Apollo
S75QB 750W
ZEROtherm FZ120
Phenom II 720BE (X4) 3.5GHZ.
Gigabyte GA MA790X UD4P
G Skill DDR2 1066 4GB.
MSI GTS 250
Seagate 7200.12 500GB.

Welcome to the show
StrangleHold is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc.