ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > Video Cards and Monitors
3DMARK06 Scores Here 3DMARK06 Scores Here
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 28 of 152 « First < 18192021222324252627 28 2930313233343536373878128 > Last »
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2006, 02:12 AM   #271 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,473
Default
good catch tweaker! i wouldn't have noticed that! lol who spends money on the software just so they can post a better score?
really... i mean you're hardware still performs the same, and your down however much the program costs lol...
i just use the trial version

btw, 3dmark06 has BEAUTIFUL GRAPHICS! the colors and detail!
lol this is why i love my video card... lol
score's in the sig... lol
__________________

Core 2 Q6600 @ 3016mhz
Radeon HD 4850 512mb
2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835
2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive
12,936 - 3dmark06 score
fade2green514 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-01-2006, 02:12 AM   #272 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by tweaker
Every poster in this thread must clearly state if any setting has been changed from the default to obtain given score. If no such info is given the score will be assumed valid for comparison.
Very good point.

Or you can say that they should get the Demo in order to achieve acurate comparisons. SInce the full version has different tests, in addition to the ability to change settins, so that itself might affect the score.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 02:19 AM   #273 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,473
Default
lol this is making me want to upgrade my video card... badly...
lol 7900gtx all the way!!
wait nvm those pricess... lol
edit: DUAL 7900gtx all the way! haha... that would be over $1000 though... not worth it.. haha
__________________

Core 2 Q6600 @ 3016mhz
Radeon HD 4850 512mb
2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835
2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive
12,936 - 3dmark06 score
fade2green514 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 02:28 AM   #274 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tweaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 30
Posts: 2,954
Default
The PRO version that you pay for do unlock some extra test settings to play around with yes, it does not however affect the 3Dmark score obtained when being run at the default settings.

Now back on topic.
__________________
tweaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-01-2006, 02:32 AM   #275 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by tweaker
The PRO version that you pay for do unlock some extra test settings to play around with yes, it does not however affect the 3Dmark score obtained when being run at the default settings.

Now back on topic.
You sure? I thought if you had the PRO version then the Feature and Batch Size tests were selected as default. I think i ran the Pro and Demo version of '03, and my score wasnt affected too much. So i guess the big thing is people changing the resolutions and AA.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-02-2006, 04:26 AM   #276 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
Default
Heres my score:


Im going to get a better video card, but i think the cpu score is pretty nice.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 04:33 AM   #277 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Beyond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Computer Engineering @ NCSU
Posts: 1,271
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-]
Heres my score:


Im going to get a better video card, but i think the cpu score is pretty nice.
not bad.. kills my cpu score of 1499. then again, i haven't overclocked at all....
__________________
EVGA 680i // Antec P180B
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
2GB Corsair XMS2 Dominator
EVGA 8800GTX > MAG 22" (x2)
Audigy 2 ZS > a) PA2V2 > Alessandro MS-1s (music); b) Pioneer VSX-516-K/S > Insignia NS-B2111 (2)
74GB WD Raptor | 500GB WD Caviar SE16
Antec TruePower 2.0

..at factory timings.
Beyond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 05:06 AM   #278 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,473
Default
id have to run it again to get the correct res to send it as a good quality pic...
but my score was 4508
SM2.0 was 1767
HDR/SM3.0 was 1786
and cpu was 1970
omega if you want the screenshot i've got it but the quality is too high for this forum...
my screen res is 1280x1024 and i forgot to change it when i took the screenshot... w/e
btw 4508 > 2172
__________________

Core 2 Q6600 @ 3016mhz
Radeon HD 4850 512mb
2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835
2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive
12,936 - 3dmark06 score
fade2green514 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 05:06 AM   #279 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
Default
very nice, i only got 130pts lower, not bad for an intel
__________________
Desktop // Laptop
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800
750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2006, 05:09 AM   #280 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,473
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-]
very nice, i only got 130pts lower, not bad for an intel
lol or an x1600pro
is it stable at 3.6?

i hope to hit 2.8ghz with water cooling
lol overclock.net helped me a lot with the o/c
btw what do you score in sisoftware?
also, let me correct you: "not bad for a " chip based on pentium 4 cores.
haha conroe will be good! even though intel designed it!
__________________

Core 2 Q6600 @ 3016mhz
Radeon HD 4850 512mb
2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835
2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive
12,936 - 3dmark06 score
Last edited by fade2green514; 05-02-2006 at 05:12 AM.
fade2green514 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 28 of 152 « First < 18192021222324252627 28 2930313233343536373878128 > Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:04 PM.

Contact Us - Computer Forum - Sitemap - Top

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum