3DMARK06 Scores Here

**tweaker** · 05-02-2006, 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fade2green514

if you want the screenshot i've got it but the quality is too high for this forum...

http://imageshack.us/
http://photobucket.com/
http://www.theimagehosting.com/
http://www.freeimagehosting.net/
http://www.imagecave.com/
http://www.villagephotos.com/
http://www.imagevenue.com/
http://www.glowfoto.com/
http://www.putfile.com/
http://xs.to/

[-0MEGA-] · 05-02-2006, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fade2green514

lol or an x1600pro

is it stable at 3.6?

i hope to hit 2.8ghz with water cooling

lol overclock.net helped me a lot with the o/c
btw what do you score in sisoftware?
also, let me correct you: "not bad for a " chip based on pentium 4 cores.
haha conroe will be good! even though intel designed it!

im buying a new card.

Yes it's stable at 3.6

What are your temps now?

stolz · 05-03-2006, 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tweaker

Your score is not valid, the test must be run at default resolution which is 1280x1024.

Sure you can use any setting you want but be sure to mention this in your post, or this thread will become rather useless to members wanting to compare their system with others. I've seen some more than questionable posts so far.

As of the current moment, the monitor that i have cannot support that resolution...i am in the process of purchasing a 20 inch widescreen
I did not know about the resolution having to be set at 1280x1024 so i will post a new score when i get my monitor

**tweaker** · 05-03-2006, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-]

This isnt 3DMark, but i couldnt find where else to put this, and i didnt want to start my own thread.

What do you think of this bench? I was able to get my cpu to 3.8Ghz, but it wasnt completely stable.

Lets keep this thread clean, 3DMark results only. The post will be deleted.

**tweaker** · 05-06-2006, 12:36 AM

The mighty R580 currently burning in, so nothing is overclocked. Untweaked OS with all services running.

[-0MEGA-] · 05-06-2006, 02:06 AM

Wow Tweaker, when did you get that card? And if you dont mind me saying, but that was pretty dumb to get the XTX instead of the XT, since its only like 100Mhz slower.

And what was your overall score on that?

**tweaker** · 05-06-2006, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-]

if you dont mind me saying, but that was pretty dumb to get the XTX instead of the XT, since its only like 100Mhz slower.

25MHz faster core, 100MHz faster memory to be precise.

Well this XTX was $15 more than the XT so what the heck.

Quote:

And what was your overall score on that?

5563

[-0MEGA-] · 05-06-2006, 03:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tweaker

25MHz faster core, 100MHz faster memory to be precise.

Well this XTX was $15 more than the XT so what the heck.

Oh, i was thinking they were at least $100 difference, at least they were when they first came out.

God of Black Flame · 05-07-2006, 05:03 AM

how accurate is 3dMark06? i ask because previously my highest score was 2621 and i ran it again today, jsut for the hell of it without changing anythign in my computer (well, except my desktop image...yeah), and it jumped up to 2852. that just seems a little excessive for a margin of error. did i miss somethign or is that common?

Filip · 05-07-2006, 05:08 AM

Maybe then when your score was lower you were running some programs in the background and it took some of your RAM, I heard that 3DMark06 uses RAM alot unlike the previous versions, not sure though.

05-06-2006, 12:36 AM	#285 (permalink)
tweaker Moderator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Sweden Age: 30 Posts: 2,954	The mighty R580 currently burning in, so nothing is overclocked. Untweaked OS with all services running. __________________ Posting and you - CF edition www.tweaker.se FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358 Last edited by tweaker; 05-06-2006 at 01:09 AM.

05-06-2006, 02:06 AM	#286 (permalink)
[-0MEGA-] Diamond Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Concord, NH Age: 19 Posts: 27,069	Wow Tweaker, when did you get that card? And if you dont mind me saying, but that was pretty dumb to get the XTX instead of the XT, since its only like 100Mhz slower. And what was your overall score on that? __________________ Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179

05-07-2006, 05:03 AM	#289 (permalink)
God of Black Flame Bronze Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Age: 22 Posts: 70	how accurate is 3dMark06? i ask because previously my highest score was 2621 and i ran it again today, jsut for the hell of it without changing anythign in my computer (well, except my desktop image...yeah), and it jumped up to 2852. that just seems a little excessive for a margin of error. did i miss somethign or is that common? __________________ SPIKE: Windows XP Professional Althlon 64 4000+ (@2.8GHz) w/XP-90 Asus A8N SLI Premium 1GB (2x512) Corsair Dual Channel 2x80GB Hitachi SATA II (non-RAID) XFX GeForce 8800GTS 320MB (@625/975) SoundBlaster X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro Samsung 16x DVD-ROM NEC 3550A DVD+/-RW

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-07-2006, 05:08 AM	#290 (permalink)
Filip Diamond Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Croatia Age: 19 Posts: 1,977	Maybe then when your score was lower you were running some programs in the background and it took some of your RAM, I heard that 3DMark06 uses RAM alot unlike the previous versions, not sure though.