|
|
#821 (permalink) |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Virgina
Age: 22
Posts: 639
|
weird I reached 7k with x1900 series. How did you get 4k?
__________________
My MONSTER COOLER MASTER Stacker 830 RC-830-SSN1 Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 1066MHz w/ Zalman9500 fan Asus P5W DH Deluxe 4x1GB CORSAIR XMS2 DDR2 PC2 6400 4-4-4-12 1x WD HDD Raptor 150GB 10k rpm, 16mb Cache 1x SAPPHIRE X1900XTX 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 VIVO XCLIO GREATPOWER X14S4P4 650W ATX12V |
|
|
|
|
|
#822 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,286
|
1. You have the X1900XTX, I have a X1900 All in Wonder @ 500/470
2. You have a Core 2 Duo E6600, I have a Pentium D 820
__________________
Macbook/Intel Core Duo 1.83Ghz/2GB DDR2 667/60GB HD/OSX 10.4.11/160GB 3.5" Firewire External/160GB Maxtor One Touch 4 Mini External/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#823 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
|
You got a bit higher on the SM2 test with you card, here's my results:
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
#824 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 27,069
|
Here are the results with my new oc'd rig
![]()
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
#825 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,473
|
NICE
![]() a good 3-4k above what my x2 and 7900gtx scored together lol
__________________
Core 2 Q6600 @ 3016mhz Radeon HD 4850 512mb 2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835 2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive 12,936 - 3dmark06 score |
|
|
|
|
|
#826 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Netherlands
Age: 21
Posts: 7,922
|
but honestly.. I would have excpected a bit more of the Geforce 8 series.. I mean, when I compare it to what i have, yea, its an improvement, but not that big tough (and then considering my cards are what, 2 years old now?
)nevertheless, its nice
__________________
Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, I don't feel very well either Xfire - Mirrari Intel Q6600 ( @3.6GHz) Asus Triton 79 Amazing 549/3200 4x 1Gb Corsair XMS2 DDR800 Asus Maximus Formula Asus & Sapphire HD3870 512Mb ( 850/1180 ) Corsair HX620W PSU |
|
|
|
|
|
#827 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,473
|
Quote:
and it still beats it... of course, its not even the gtx... its the lower gts though its still very powerful.
__________________
Core 2 Q6600 @ 3016mhz Radeon HD 4850 512mb 2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835 2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive 12,936 - 3dmark06 score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#828 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Netherlands
Age: 21
Posts: 7,922
|
yea.. but the 7800 series is 2 generations older that the 8800
( the 7900/7950 came in between, and yes, i do consider them to be a own generation because of having a different arcitecture)also, an slightly overclocked 7950GX2 could reach the same score as that iirc ![]() edit:.. but yes... Strength in numbers ftw. ^_^
__________________
Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, I don't feel very well either Xfire - Mirrari Intel Q6600 ( @3.6GHz) Asus Triton 79 Amazing 549/3200 4x 1Gb Corsair XMS2 DDR800 Asus Maximus Formula Asus & Sapphire HD3870 512Mb ( 850/1180 ) Corsair HX620W PSU |
|
|
|
|
|
#829 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,473
|
well, actually the 7800 and 7900 series are the same architecure (hence the same pixel pipeline and vertex shader count)... the difference is between clock rate because of the switch from 130nm (or was it 110nm?) to 90nm... letting nvidia raise core clock a bunch.
imagine 8800gtx quad SLI lol can you say 25k in 3dmark06? insane. lol then again, you never know with bottlenecks lol
__________________
Core 2 Q6600 @ 3016mhz Radeon HD 4850 512mb 2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835 2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive 12,936 - 3dmark06 score |
|
|
|
|
|
#830 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Netherlands
Age: 21
Posts: 7,922
|
yea... but going from 130nm (i think it was 130..
) to 90nm makes quite a new chip imo.. call it the 7800MkII if you want ![]() but like I said, I did excpect a bit more.. meaning it's my oppinion, nobody has to (and appearantly does) agree with me on that ![]() Its a nice score,.. but I would have expected 12k or so tbh
__________________
Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, I don't feel very well either Xfire - Mirrari Intel Q6600 ( @3.6GHz) Asus Triton 79 Amazing 549/3200 4x 1Gb Corsair XMS2 DDR800 Asus Maximus Formula Asus & Sapphire HD3870 512Mb ( 850/1180 ) Corsair HX620W PSU |
|
|
|