3DMARK06 Scores Here

ckfordy · 01-19-2006, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rambo

I thought you were testing it with the rig in your sig! You actually had me worried!

ya i forgot i had that in my sig instead of my intel but i am thinking of waiting tell the new amd processors come out and getting that. i would be pretty worried about that score with the stuff in my sig to

Rambo · 01-20-2006, 12:21 AM

I see you've added the words "NEW BUILD MAYBE COMING SOON" to it now

Atleast we know now.

redrider773 · 01-20-2006, 12:47 AM

Okay, here it is. CPU was horrivle to watch through. .38fps avg. or something.
I'm not too impressed with it.... especially considering I cranked my PCI-E frequency to 120, and OCed clocks to settings in my sig.

Crap, cant upload image. It's 4054 (and 1059 CPU)

[-0MEGA-] · 01-20-2006, 12:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redrider773

Okay, here it is. CPU was horrivle to watch through. .38fps avg. or something.
I'm not too impressed with it.... especially considering I cranked my PCI-E frequency to 120, and OCed clocks to settings in my sig.

Crap, cant upload image. It's 4054 (and 1059 CPU)

the major drawback is your cpu, since its not dual-core.

MIK3daG33K · 01-20-2006, 01:42 AM

Ya my dual core with a 7800 GT beats your x1800xt with single core. Thats kinda funny.

[-0MEGA-] · 01-20-2006, 01:48 AM

See everyone, the time of only needing a single core is over... Soon thats the kind of difference you'll see when playing games with a Dual core over a single core.

MatrixEVO · 01-20-2006, 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geoff5093

See everyone, the time of only needing a single core is over... Soon thats the kind of difference you'll see when playing games with a Dual core over a single core.

Exactly, which is why before school is over, I will be getting an X2.

Ku-sama · 01-20-2006, 02:26 AM

what i dont get is how my processor score is 1089 and i had mine at 2.6GHz with memory bus speeds changed, thats it, compared to his 1059 at 2.7

P11 · 01-20-2006, 02:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatrixEVO

Exactly, which is why before school is over, I will be getting an X2.

I think that making any dramatic upgrades or building a new PC until later 06 or early 07 will be a very bad choice. The main reason is windows vista...as you all know all the new games that are made for vista will only be playable on a vista OS with a directx10 compatable card. (or it will use a emulation of x9) Not to mention socket AM2 is comming out which marks the end of 939 gaming system in 07. Along with that you except alot of new technology being released in 06 and early 07 and I would highly recommend to just settle down and live with the pc you have at the moment.

[-0MEGA-] · 01-20-2006, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ku-sama

what i dont get is how my processor score is 1089 and i had mine at 2.6GHz with memory bus speeds changed, thats it, compared to his 1059 at 2.7

because its not a dual core... thats about the same speed at redrider's. And i get around 800 with my cpu.

01-20-2006, 12:21 AM	#82 (permalink)
Rambo Diamond Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: United Kingdom Posts: 3,816	I see you've added the words "NEW BUILD MAYBE COMING SOON" to it now Atleast we know now. __________________ "75% of all statistics are made up, including this one. 62.481% of people who read that believe it is true. *And if you're one of the 37.519% who don't, copy and paste this into your signature." -* tlarkin, Cromewell, and Rambo. Intel E6300 Conroe @ 2.8 Ghz GigaByte GA 965P DS3 LGA 775 Sapphire Radeon X1800XT 256MB GeIL 2 x GX22 DDR2 Kit = 4GB RAM Antec TruePower 2.0 TP-II 550 Watt

01-20-2006, 12:47 AM	#83 (permalink)
redrider773 Platinum Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: New Hampshire USA Age: 18 Posts: 510	Okay, here it is. CPU was horrivle to watch through. .38fps avg. or something. I'm not too impressed with it.... especially considering I cranked my PCI-E frequency to 120, and OCed clocks to settings in my sig. Crap, cant upload image. It's 4054 (and 1059 CPU) __________________ CPU.......................AMD 64 San Diego 4000+ 2.4 Ghz → 2.8 Ghz Video Card............ATi X1800XT 512Mb 625 Mhz/1500 Mhz → 690 Mhz/1600 Mhz Memory.................4 x 512Mb OCZ Gold Motheboard..........ASUS A8R-MVP Crossfire Drives....................250 Gb SATA 150 & 120 Gb & DVD-RW & DVD OS..........................Windows XP Media Center '05 & Ubuntu Case.......................X-Navigator 500Watts 3DMark.................'03 = 17644....'05 = 9492....'06 = 4054

01-20-2006, 01:42 AM	#85 (permalink)
MIK3daG33K Gold Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Detroit, MI Age: 21 Posts: 477	Ya my dual core with a 7800 GT beats your x1800xt with single core. Thats kinda funny. __________________ DFI LanParty UT Nforce4 Ultra-D AMD Opteron 170 @ 2700 (1.6 Vcore) w\ Thermaltake Big Typhoon 1 GB of OCZ Gold rev. 2 PC-3200 RAM (2.2.2.5) BFG Geforce 7800 GT (510 \ 1.25) w\ NV Silencer 5 Western Digital 120 / 160 GB SATA 7200 RPM hard drive Antec TruePower 2.0 550 W power supply Samsung SyncMaster 204B 20.1 in. (5 ms) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic Logitech Z-5300e 5.1 Surround Sound

01-20-2006, 01:48 AM	#86 (permalink)
[-0MEGA-] Diamond Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Concord, NH Age: 19 Posts: 25,279	See everyone, the time of only needing a single core is over... Soon thats the kind of difference you'll see when playing games with a Dual core over a single core. __________________ Pentium Dual-Core E2200 @ 3.3GHz Gigabyte P35-DS3L ATI HD 3870 GDDR4 @ (875/2272) 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2-1000 500GB SATAII HD w/16MB SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 11515

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-20-2006, 02:26 AM	#88 (permalink)
Ku-sama banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Computer Cave. AKA: King Computer Inc. Age: 18 Posts: 5,312	what i dont get is how my processor score is 1089 and i had mine at 2.6GHz with memory bus speeds changed, thats it, compared to his 1059 at 2.7