ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-21-2006, 11:12 PM   #1 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Johnny Prefect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 88
Default Cpu overclocking question

QuestionRight. Now, im overlcoking my ram...nothing big...just went from 200 FSB to 235...now...my question is...i see people using the CPu multiplier and divider to bring down the frequency on the ram that has been automatically been brought up with the cpu. Why would i want to do this?

See, right now ..i have it at 235 FSB and the RAM at at a ratio of 1:1.
my timings are 2.5,3,3,7 stable....and the ram is up to 235 mhz DDR470. This is the ram and processor in my sig.

Now..today, i was playing around with A64MemFrequency. Theoretically i could put the FSB at 244 the multiplier at 9, the mem divider at 166 mhz, the DRAM would be back at 200 which is the default..and the CPU frequency would be at 2196.

which would be faster?...and...why would i want to bring my RAM speed back...i am new to this and have seen others doing it. Im just curious and want the best performance for my system. Anyway...any answers would be appreciated.
__________________

AMD Athlon 64 3700+ 2.2ghz (OC'd to 2.8 Stable)
DFI LANParty UT NF4 SLI-DR Expert
Western Digital Raptor 74GB
PNY GeForce 7800 GT 256MB
Ultra 600w X-Finity
Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
OCZ EL Platinum PC3200 2GB 2X1GB CL2-3-2-5
Ultra UV Wizard MS Blue Case
Johnny Prefect is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-22-2006, 06:41 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
 
ceewi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 21
Posts: 5,237
Default

If your system is stable, you should keep your divider at 200. When you OC your FSB/HTT, you will also increase the speed of the RAM (it seems you know this). The RAM may not always be stable at this higher frequency. People will cut the divider down to 166 to reduce the speed of the RAM, and thus maintain stability.

It's also commonly reduced when testing for your max OC. Since you want to find the max OC of your CPU, the RAM divider is decreased, so that the RAM isn't the limiting factor.

You're also much faster at your current setting. If I recall correctly, the 3700+ has a default multiplier of 11x, so a clock speed of 2585Mhz at your current settings. You'd loose 389Mhz of CPU speed for a gain of 9Mhz in the FSB, while also reducing the speed of your RAM. Definitely not worth it.
__________________

CPU: Core 2 Duo E6600 / MOBO: Gigabyte 965P-DS3 / GPU: Gigabyte HD4870
RAM: 2GB G.Skill F2-6400CL4D-2GBPK / HDD: 2TB Total HDD / PSU: Antec NeoPower 480W

Cheap PSUs - 2% of system costs, responsible for 28% of system deaths
As Sealed Stick was removed, lost or damaged, it shall be out of warranty validity.
- The "Warranty void if removed" sticker on numerous CoolerMaster PSUs.


Last edited by ceewi1; 01-22-2006 at 06:48 AM.
ceewi1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 03:05 PM   #3 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 19,951
Default

Quote:
Why would i want to do this?
A few reasons:
1. If you dont wanna increase vDimm
2. If you want to preserve timings and command rate

Quote:
which would be faster?...
Try it and find out
__________________
ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, Q6600@3.7 / ASUS P5ND, E6400@3.8
4GB OCz Platinum XTC 8500 / 4GB CorsairXMS2 6400
5x500GB Seagate 7200.10 / 2x500 Seagate 7200.10
OCz 8800GTX 768MB @ 630/800 / 2x Galaxy 8800GT SLI
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum