ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Digital Imaging > Digital Cameras, Webcams and Scanners

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2006, 05:01 AM   #21 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
The_Other_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lexington, NC
Age: 24
Posts: 12,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by computerhakk
the 3 mp is the second one.? there are still noises.

i'd go w/ the panasonic
No, it was the first one.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v22/theotherone/1.jpg = 3.2MP(well, from it )
__________________
Desktop * Athlon X2 4200 | 2G RAM | 160G HD | 7600GT
Laptop1 * C2D T5550 | 3G RAM | 120G HD | Intel x3100
Laptop2 * C2D T5250 | 2G RAM | 160G HD | Intel x3100

The_Other_One is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-23-2006, 08:30 PM   #22 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
spacedude89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oregon
Age: 19
Posts: 1,419
Default

I have a panasonic camera and i love it. the Lz2 also has a larger LCD, and it has image stabalization.

Comparison
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/comp..._r717&show=all

Sample Shots for the LZ2
http://www.dpreview.com/gallery/panasoniclz2_samples/
__________________
Desktop: Abit AW9D-MAX ~ Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4GHz ~ Radeon X1900GT
Laptop: HP ~ Core Duo T2050 ~ nVidia 7600

First smiles, then lies. Last comes gunfire.
spacedude89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 08:37 PM   #23 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
spacedude89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oregon
Age: 19
Posts: 1,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Other_One
No, it was the first one.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v22/theotherone/1.jpg = 3.2MP(well, from it )
Theres no point in comparing an image that small. More megapixels are important when you are making a large print or something like that.
__________________
Desktop: Abit AW9D-MAX ~ Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4GHz ~ Radeon X1900GT
Laptop: HP ~ Core Duo T2050 ~ nVidia 7600

First smiles, then lies. Last comes gunfire.
spacedude89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 09:40 PM   #24 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,389
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacedude89
Theres no point in comparing an image that small. More megapixels are important when you are making a large print or something like that.
Exactly what i said, lol

its also good if you want to do a good amount of cropping.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 960 (6-6-6-18)
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2006, 06:46 PM   #25 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
spacedude89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oregon
Age: 19
Posts: 1,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geoff5093
Exactly what i said, lol

its also good if you want to do a good amount of cropping.
lol, i dont always read the whole thread. just skim it.
__________________
Desktop: Abit AW9D-MAX ~ Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4GHz ~ Radeon X1900GT
Laptop: HP ~ Core Duo T2050 ~ nVidia 7600

First smiles, then lies. Last comes gunfire.
spacedude89 is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum