ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > Computer Memory and Hard Drives

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2006, 10:09 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
ReturnToEmpire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Age: 18
Posts: 417
Default DDR vs DDR2

what are the real advantages of having DDR2, it seems they produce alot mreo heat and the timings are alot higher. wouldnt this be bad? i dont understand the differences.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreaminginred
AND also, if i build my own computer, is it possible to install a mac operating systen instead of windows??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praetor
Thankfully, no
ReturnToEmpire is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-23-2006, 10:11 PM   #2 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,389
Default

Their speed are much higher, say DDR667Mhz vs DDR400Mhz.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 960 (6-6-6-18)
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 10:34 PM   #3 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
ReturnToEmpire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Age: 18
Posts: 417
Default

ok but what does that assist in? if their timings are lower arent they essentially slower than regular DDR
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreaminginred
AND also, if i build my own computer, is it possible to install a mac operating systen instead of windows??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praetor
Thankfully, no
ReturnToEmpire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 10:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
4W4K3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Age: 20
Posts: 6,886
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ReturnToEmpire
ok but what does that assist in? if their timings are lower arent they essentially slower than regular DDR
MHz are almost always more significant than timings.

1GB DDR333 @ 2-2-2-5 is going to be slower than 1GB DDR2 667 @ 3-4-4-8, even though the timings are alot faster/tighter with the DDR.

Timings are more of a "fine tune", running tighter timings doesn't mean your RAM is better. Now with equal RAM speeds, the one with tighter timings is probably going to win, but even a relatively "small" increase in MHz can make up for the "tighter" timings.

Also, DDR2 has significantly more bandwidth I think, which is always a good thing.
__________________
My Computer
I choose to believe what I was programmed to believe.
Can I eat your brain?
FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358
4W4K3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 11:05 PM   #5 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
ReturnToEmpire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Age: 18
Posts: 417
Default

thanks 4w4k3 i was interested in this because of the new AM2 socket ocming out soon. how much of a difference its going to make, i also read a review on overclockercafe that showed very little increase in FPS during GAMing using DDR2 vs DDR, and i am a gamer so i wanted this information, thanks geoff and 4W4K3.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreaminginred
AND also, if i build my own computer, is it possible to install a mac operating systen instead of windows??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praetor
Thankfully, no
ReturnToEmpire is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-23-2006, 11:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
P.I Dragon
 
dragon2309's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KENT, UK
Age: 20
Posts: 8,498
Default

Quote:
that showed very little increase in FPS during GAMing using DDR2 vs DDR
Thats because the RAM wasnt the bottleneck, most likely the CPU or the gfx card was... and RAM doesnt directly affect game FPS anyway, it assists in loading times etc.... The thing you want to look at on DDR2 RAM is its maximum bandwidth, it is excessively igher/faster than stabdard DR memory modules.
__________________
Intel Core2Duo E6600 @ 3.1Ghz - (__CPU__)
eVGA 680i SLi - (__MOB__)
4Gb Corsair Dominator DDR2-800 (4x1024Mb) - (__RAM__)
250Gb Western Digital SATAII 7200rpm - (__HDD__)
nVidia BFG 8800GTS OC 320Mb - (__GFX__)
LG DVD+/-RW 18x DVD-RAM - (__OPT__)
Triple Boot - [XP Pro] + [Vista Ultimate] + [Ubuntu 7.10] - (__OS__)

[3DMARK'03 :: 25,587] --- [3DMARK'05 :: 13,989] --- [3DMARK'06 :: 8791] - (__BENCHMARKS__)


dragon2309.co.uk - a little slice of geek

dragon2309 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2006, 11:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cromewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 10,368
Default

Quote:
Also, DDR2 has significantly more bandwidth I think, which is always a good thing.
Higher RAM clocking = more bandwidth. PC2700 has less bandwidth than PC3200. The timings are how many clock cycles it takes for something to happen.
__________________

You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here.

www.userfriendly.org
Cromewell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:31 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum