|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which one is better for Gaming? | |||
| AMD Athlon 4000+ - Single Core |
|
2 | 11.76% |
| AMD Athlon 4200+ - Dual Core |
|
15 | 88.24% |
| Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Gold Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 258
|
4200: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103547
4000: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103497 Friends suggest 4000, this site suggests 4200. I will mostly gaming, and the most multi-tasking I will be doing is iTunes + Gaming, iTunes + Porn, etc. not Much multi-tasking. So which do you think I should go with? P.S. What's the difference between the above 4000 and this one?: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103529 Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Super Moderator
![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lexington, NC
Age: 24
Posts: 12,382
|
I don't know the current benchmarks right off, so ti's hard to say... However, I think the 4000 will be just a TINY bit better(probably not noticable) for now. The Duel core will probably be better in the future as more games actually use it.
And, you're last link is something I was about to bring up... There are different types of 4000 and other speeds of the processors. Mostly, between those two, the San Diego has SSE3 and is on a smaller process(slightly faster, I beleive cooler, or hotter...I always forget ;P) Either way, it's probably best to get the San Diego than say the Claw Hammer series mostly just for SSE3, if anyone know where that's actually used... |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10
|
id look for either of them but make shure its a brisbane core i just picked up a 4000+x2 for 60$ (brisbane core) and its super sweet i have already gotten it from 2.1 ghz to 2.37 ghz and thats just with a few tweaks
the new brisbane core runs cooler and is the newer tech cpu well i tried to post some specs on the m.i.p.s of the diffrent cpu's but it didnt work lol
__________________
amd athlon 64 x2 4000+ gigabyte ga-m57sli-s4 motherboard 2 gigs ocz gold ddr2 800 250 gig segate sata 200gig wd sata dual layer samsung dvd/cd writer 500 wat ps scythe katana 2 cpu cooler dual 256 mb pci-e evga 8600gt's custom area52 case with 2 120 mm blue led fans Last edited by discgolfer72; 12-18-2007 at 06:18 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
|
I suggests 4200
__________________
Submit Articles-MxGet |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
|
People are actually asking if dual or quad cores are better, so you're a bit behind the game
![]() I would go with the dual-core, as almost all new games support at least 2 cores.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900) 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960 750GB SATAII w/32MB Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 22605 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 18
Posts: 1,340
|
Earlier this year, I went from an FX-55 to a 4200+, was amazed at the speed increase, the 4200+ was so much faster.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz RAM : 8GB DDR2 PC6400 / 2GB DDR2 PC5300 HDD : 750GB SATA Seagate Barracuda/ Hitachi 120GB 5400RPM SATA GPU : Radeon HD2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB OS : Windows Vista Ultimate x64 / Windows Vista Basic PSU : Hiper 730W ATX / 80W Dell Laptop Power Brick |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
|
haha, wow. I just love when people bump up these old threads...
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900) 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960 750GB SATAII w/32MB Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 22605 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|