ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

View Poll Results: Which one is better for Gaming?
AMD Athlon 4000+ - Single Core 2 11.76%
AMD Athlon 4200+ - Dual Core 15 88.24%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2006, 10:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 258
Default 4200 vs. 4000

4200: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103547
4000: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103497


Friends suggest 4000, this site suggests 4200. I will mostly gaming, and the most multi-tasking I will be doing is iTunes + Gaming, iTunes + Porn, etc. not Much multi-tasking. So which do you think I should go with?

P.S. What's the difference between the above 4000 and this one?:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103529

Thanks!
ItlanChode is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 02-26-2006, 10:32 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
The_Other_One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lexington, NC
Age: 24
Posts: 12,382
Default

I don't know the current benchmarks right off, so ti's hard to say... However, I think the 4000 will be just a TINY bit better(probably not noticable) for now. The Duel core will probably be better in the future as more games actually use it.

And, you're last link is something I was about to bring up... There are different types of 4000 and other speeds of the processors. Mostly, between those two, the San Diego has SSE3 and is on a smaller process(slightly faster, I beleive cooler, or hotter...I always forget ;P) Either way, it's probably best to get the San Diego than say the Claw Hammer series mostly just for SSE3, if anyone know where that's actually used...
The_Other_One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 10:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 22
Posts: 128
Default

Go for the dual core.
__________________
Athlon 3800 X2
1GB System Memory
250GB hard drive
7800GT BFG Tech
500W PSU
Conroe blows the doors off my system :(
TooMuchButtHair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 10:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 258
Default

Quote:
However, I think the 4000 will be just a TINY bit better(probably not noticable) for now
That right there makes me want to get the 4200+, and the fact that it will be optimized in a short while.
ItlanChode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 06:15 AM   #5 (permalink)
New Member
 
discgolfer72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 10
Default

id look for either of them but make shure its a brisbane core i just picked up a 4000+x2 for 60$ (brisbane core) and its super sweet i have already gotten it from 2.1 ghz to 2.37 ghz and thats just with a few tweaks
the new brisbane core runs cooler and is the newer tech cpu

well i tried to post some specs on the m.i.p.s of the diffrent cpu's but it didnt work lol
__________________
amd athlon 64 x2 4000+
gigabyte ga-m57sli-s4 motherboard
2 gigs ocz gold ddr2 800
250 gig segate sata
200gig wd sata
dual layer samsung dvd/cd writer
500 wat ps
scythe katana 2 cpu cooler
dual 256 mb pci-e evga 8600gt's
custom area52 case with 2 120 mm blue led fans

Last edited by discgolfer72; 12-18-2007 at 06:18 AM.
discgolfer72 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-18-2007, 10:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
New Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6
Default

I suggests 4200
__________________
Submit Articles-MxGet
graspit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 03:18 PM   #7 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
Default

People are actually asking if dual or quad cores are better, so you're a bit behind the game

I would go with the dual-core, as almost all new games support at least 2 cores.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 05:21 PM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Garethman!!`'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK and USA
Age: 18
Posts: 1,340
Default

Earlier this year, I went from an FX-55 to a 4200+, was amazed at the speed increase, the 4200+ was so much faster.
__________________
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 / AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 1.70GHz
RAM : 8GB DDR2 PC6400
/ 2GB DDR2 PC5300
HDD : 750GB SATA Seagate Barracuda/ Hitachi 120GB 5400RPM SATA
GPU : Radeon HD2900XT 512MB / Radeon Xpress 1150 128MB
OS : Windows Vista Ultimate x64 / Windows Vista Basic
PSU : Hiper 730W ATX / 80W Dell Laptop Power Brick
Garethman!!` is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 08:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Age: 22
Posts: 128
Default

This thread is 10 months old....
__________________
Athlon 3800 X2
1GB System Memory
250GB hard drive
7800GT BFG Tech
500W PSU
Conroe blows the doors off my system :(
TooMuchButtHair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2007, 08:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TooMuchButtHair View Post
This thread is 10 months old....
haha, wow. I just love when people bump up these old threads...
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz
Asus Rampage Formula X48
ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 (800/1900)
4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960
750GB SATAII w/32MB
Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
22605
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2008 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum