fx5200 slower than previous card

grapejuice · 03-07-2006, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MatrixEVO

Ahhh, what a funny thread, anyways... If you overclock the 5200 to the 4800 speeds, then you have almost the same performance.

lol stop dreaming.

youd have to overclock the 4800 by 400mhz to reach 5200 performance.

**dragon2309** · 03-07-2006, 11:20 PM

Quote:

umm no? then how come the fx5200 has a higher number? 5200>4800 lol. go back and do 1st grade math

the fx5200 scores 600 more 3dmark points because 5200-4800 = 600. that means the fx5200 is better. it also has faster circuit boards with special material the best buy guy said to me. he also said something about dx9.

but i kno that i didnt downgrade, now tell me good drivers so i can get the performance i should be getting out of it.

-grapejuice

Quote:

umm agp 8x on fx5200 4x on ti4800.

fx5200 is faster.

man you dont give up easily do you, take the hint, you obviously came here for help.... why arent you accepting the help, the FX5200 is a slower card!!! End of story.

the Ti4800 has a core clock speed of 300Mhz, and a memory clock speed of 300Mhz also, the 5200 has a core clock of a SLOWER 250Mhz, and mem clock of just 200Mhz. The Ti4800's, mem bandwidth is 9.6 GB/sec, where as the 5200's is 6.4 GB/sec.

Stats ont he 5200:

Code:

Shader Operations - 1000 Operations/sec
Pixel Fill Rate - 1000 MPixels/sec
Texture Fill Rate - 1000 MTexels/sec

Stats on the Ti4800:

Code:

Shader Operations - 1200 Operations/sec
Pixel Fill Rate - 1200 MPixels/sec
Texture Fill Rate - 2400 MTexels/sec

Also, he Ti4800 has 63 million Transistors, the 5200 has 47 million.

I could have jsut let the others heere continue to lecture you for another 30-odd posts but instead i choose to baffle you with raw figuires, its there in black and white, the Ti4800 is a faster card than the FX5200

if you want to see for yourself then please do, visit http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards....=140&card2=153 that is exactly where i got my info from in this post.

dragon2309

*EDIT* -

Quote:

lol stop dreaming.

youd have to overclock the 4800 by 400mhz to reach 5200 performance.

you really have no clue what your talking about do you....

Hairy_Lee · 03-07-2006, 11:21 PM

its a bit more advanced than clock for clock.... you're still wrong with regards to the 5200 being faster

spacedude89 · 03-07-2006, 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by grapejuice

lol stop dreaming.

youd have to overclock the 4800 by 400mhz to reach 5200 performance.

Heh,

You have to overclock the GPU by only 50mhz

and the Memory by 100mhz,

grapejuice · 03-07-2006, 11:27 PM

umm no i think id kno i had to oc ti4800 by 400mhz to reach fx5200 serial presence detect freq.

**dragon2309** · 03-07-2006, 11:29 PM

are you not listenign or loking, read my friggin post for god sake, raw facts that prove you wrong, look for christ sakes, ill even give you a special link to my post so you CANT MISS IT

HERE - fx5200 slower than previous card

and it seems to me that you are thinking the gap between a 4800 and a 5200 = 400, they are model numbers, not a rating of speed..... they are just names.

spacedude89 · 03-07-2006, 11:31 PM

Stupidity knows no boundaries....

grapejuice · 03-07-2006, 11:31 PM

no i wont bother reading what u post, since ur wrong. you must realize that the FSB feedback regulation chip on the fx5200 can push out 20 more RMS ohms than the ti4800 which has a 13 fluxamp regulator.

**dragon2309** · 03-07-2006, 11:33 PM

OMFG, its sooo hard for me to hold back on whooping your ass it really is, your lucky this forum has a comprehensive word filter. READ THE DAMN FACTS MAN.... seriously, you have a complete forum of computer boffs here telling you you are wrong and you still wont give in, my your are one tough cookie.

spacedude89 · 03-07-2006, 11:33 PM

*Yells for Praetor to come here*

03-07-2006, 11:21 PM	#13 (permalink)
Hairy_Lee VIP Member Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Plymouth, UK Age: 25 Posts: 2,553	its a bit more advanced than clock for clock.... you're still wrong with regards to the 5200 being faster __________________ Intel Core 2 Duo E6750 EVGA nForce 650i Ultra mainboard EVGA 7950 GT KO SC 512Mb w/ Zalman VF-900Cu 2Gb of OCZ GOLD XTC SPECIAL OPS Eition Notebook - Acer Aspire 9300 - Turion TL-60/ 2 Gb RAM/ Geforce Go 7600 128 Dedicated (400 Mb turbocache)

03-07-2006, 11:29 PM	#16 (permalink)
dragon2309 P.I Dragon Join Date: May 2005 Location: KENT, UK Age: 20 Posts: 8,681	are you not listenign or loking, read my friggin post for god sake, raw facts that prove you wrong, look for christ sakes, ill even give you a special link to my post so you CANT MISS IT HERE - fx5200 slower than previous card and it seems to me that you are thinking the gap between a 4800 and a 5200 = 400, they are model numbers, not a rating of speed..... they are just names. __________________ Intel Core2Duo E6600 @ 3.1Ghz - (__CPU__) eVGA 680i SLi - (__MOB__) 4Gb Corsair Dominator DDR2-800 (4x1024Mb) - (__RAM__) 250Gb Western Digital SATAII 7200rpm - (__HDD__) nVidia BFG 8800GTS OC 320Mb - (__GFX__) LG DVD+/-RW 18x DVD-RAM - (__OPT__) Triple Boot - [XP Pro] + [Vista Ultimate] + [Ubuntu 7.10] - (__OS__) [3DMARK'03 :: 25,587] --- [3DMARK'05 :: 13,989] --- [3DMARK'06 :: 8791] - (__BENCHMARKS__) dragon2309.co.uk - a little slice of geek Last edited by dragon2309; 03-07-2006 at 11:31 PM.

03-07-2006, 11:31 PM	#17 (permalink)
spacedude89 Diamond Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Oregon Age: 19 Posts: 1,419	Stupidity knows no boundaries.... __________________ Desktop: Abit AW9D-MAX ~ Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4GHz ~ Radeon X1900GT Laptop: HP ~ Core Duo T2050 ~ nVidia 7600 First smiles, then lies. Last comes gunfire.

03-07-2006, 11:33 PM	#19 (permalink)
dragon2309 P.I Dragon Join Date: May 2005 Location: KENT, UK Age: 20 Posts: 8,681	OMFG, its sooo hard for me to hold back on whooping your ass it really is, your lucky this forum has a comprehensive word filter. READ THE DAMN FACTS MAN.... seriously, you have a complete forum of computer boffs here telling you you are wrong and you still wont give in, my your are one tough cookie. __________________ Intel Core2Duo E6600 @ 3.1Ghz - (__CPU__) eVGA 680i SLi - (__MOB__) 4Gb Corsair Dominator DDR2-800 (4x1024Mb) - (__RAM__) 250Gb Western Digital SATAII 7200rpm - (__HDD__) nVidia BFG 8800GTS OC 320Mb - (__GFX__) LG DVD+/-RW 18x DVD-RAM - (__OPT__) Triple Boot - [XP Pro] + [Vista Ultimate] + [Ubuntu 7.10] - (__OS__) [3DMARK'03 :: 25,587] --- [3DMARK'05 :: 13,989] --- [3DMARK'06 :: 8791] - (__BENCHMARKS__) dragon2309.co.uk - a little slice of geek

03-07-2006, 11:33 PM	#20 (permalink)
spacedude89 Diamond Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Oregon Age: 19 Posts: 1,419	Yells for Praetor to come here __________________ Desktop: Abit AW9D-MAX ~ Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.4GHz ~ Radeon X1900GT Laptop: HP ~ Core Duo T2050 ~ nVidia 7600 First smiles, then lies. Last comes gunfire.

03-07-2006, 11:27 PM	#15 (permalink)
grapejuice banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 6	umm no i think id kno i had to oc ti4800 by 400mhz to reach fx5200 serial presence detect freq.

03-07-2006, 11:31 PM	#18 (permalink)
grapejuice banned Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 6	no i wont bother reading what u post, since ur wrong. you must realize that the FSB feedback regulation chip on the fx5200 can push out 20 more RMS ohms than the ti4800 which has a 13 fluxamp regulator.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode