ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Desktop Computers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2006, 02:50 AM   #11 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
LithiumSunset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 67
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dragoon38900
(im not really sure of this) Based on my research, the single core 3.6 would be faster in terms of just playing one game/using one application at a time. However, when it comes to multitasking, the dual 3.0 would blow the single 3.6 away in performance. If your like my friend, and likes to just play games, the single core would be better. However, if your like me, who plays games WHILE doing other stuff like photoshop, video editing, browsing internet, etc, then go for the dual core.
Well, your right to a degree. Dual cores may not produce the same FPS as singles do in some games however, it depends on how the game is written. Besides that, most games are coming out with patches that support dual core and along with some games now, all future games will support dual core.

Now if you wanna talk performance, my opteron is currently running @2.5Ghz from it's stock speed of 1.8Ghz. I have an Intel 630 prescott single core here with HT enabled running at stock speed.

Opteron:
http://s44.photobucket.com/albums/f1...rrentSpecs.jpg

Intel 630:
http://s44.photobucket.com/albums/f1...StockTemps.jpg

Now, here's the opterons 3DMark06 score:
http://s44.photobucket.com/albums/f1...ark06Score.jpg

and the Intels score:
http://s44.photobucket.com/albums/f1...ntel3DMark.jpg


Now, keep in mind the opteron is running 500Mhz less than the Intel machine is and only has 1 Gig of RAM compared to 2 Gigs the Intel machine has. Both machines at the time of the test had the exact same graphics card, an XFX 7800GT.

This just kind of gives you an idea as to how dual cores can stack up against single core processors. I realize there are all kinds of variables and I for one am certainly not saying single cores or Intel are not good. My objective it to prove that dual core processors are easily overclockable, run games very well and just as good if not better than single core processors in some cases and multitask very well.
__________________
I use DFI - Intel and AMD exclusively.
I build and test everything under the sun. If you want an unbiased answer, ask me.
LithiumSunset is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 04-09-2006, 02:54 AM   #12 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
LithiumSunset's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 67
Default

Let me just add one more thing, I have tested both of my Pentium D 930 and 950 machines pretty much at stock speeds and they came fairly close to the Opteron scores in the benchmark test I ran. I just don't have the screens up yet.
__________________
I use DFI - Intel and AMD exclusively.
I build and test everything under the sun. If you want an unbiased answer, ask me.
LithiumSunset is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 11:31 AM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
tweaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Sweden
Age: 30
Posts: 2,954
Default

Quote:
Both machines at the time of the test had the exact same graphics card, an XFX 7800GT.
Hehe I dont know how you managed 600/573 with a 78GT when my 68GT at stock got 1120/1019, almost the double.

http://www.computerforum.com/showpos...&postcount=157
__________________
tweaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2006, 11:58 AM   #14 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Mankz_91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ......UK
Age: 16
Posts: 531
Default

If possible, try to get a pentium 9-- series chip - 65nm and alot better than 6-- or 8-- series chips.
__________________
Project Watery

Sponsored by...:
HWLabs SpecialTech Feser 1
Mankz_91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2006, 03:29 PM   #15 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
csi1189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Age: 18
Posts: 86
Default

i ended up getting the vgc-rc110g - plenty of room for upgrades from the standard 250gb. and its the pentium d 830 model, not the 930. but still 3.0ghz, which is definately better than my current laptop's 2.4ghz celeron p.o.s...
csi1189 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 04-12-2006, 12:16 AM   #16 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
csi1189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Age: 18
Posts: 86
Default

btw, mankz_91, thats an amazing comp ur building there - i'm definately in awe
csi1189 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum