ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > CPUs and Overclocking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2006, 04:47 AM   #1 (permalink)
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 126
Default long term effects when oc'ing

if you oc a cpu just in mhz, not changing the vcore at all, is there any bad side effects in the future as long as it is still running at normal temps?
Phate321 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 04-24-2006, 05:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Bootup05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Essex, UK
Age: 17
Posts: 1,266
Default

Even if you are just changing the FSB on your cpu the temps will slightly increase, and it really deprends within each core but id say without upping the vcore voltage stick within a 350Mhz increase otherwise u could damage it by not giving it enough voltage!
__________________
Main System
Proccy - Intel E6400 @ 3440 | Mobo - P5B DLX | RAM - 2GB TwinX 6400 C5 | GPU - 96GT
HDD - WD 400GB Caviar SE - WD 320GB Caviar SE - 160GB Seagate Ext
Monitor - Asus 19" Wide LCD | PSU - Tagan 600W Dual Engine | Soundcard - SB Live Ext 24
Heatsink - S Infinity | Optical - Pioneer DVDRW | OS - Vista Ult64 SP1
Bootup05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 05:45 AM   #3 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
34erd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 15
Posts: 2,842
Default

As long as your temps are fine it shouldnt do too much damage, voltage is the real long time killer.

Theres no real way of saying what it could do, but it kills the warenty so you cant get a reaplcement.
__________________
DFI Lanparty UT nF4 SLI DR
Athlon 64 3500+ Venice
1 Gig OCZ VX DDR500 DDR
BFG GeForce 7800GT
160 Gig SATA HDD
CD-RW DVD-ROM
Antec NeoPower 480
Thermaltake Tsunami
34erd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 11:45 AM   #4 (permalink)
formerly liuliuboy
 
diduknowthat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Age: 17
Posts: 6,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bootup05
Even if you are just changing the FSB on your cpu the temps will slightly increase
sure it may slighly increase by a tiny bit, i oced 200mhz without 1 degree increase, but that little temperature really isn't having a long term affect.
__________________
Silent Tuned | 3D Marks 06: 11566
Q6600 2.4ghz CPU | Gigabyte GA-P35 LGA 775 MB
EVGA 8800gt 512mb Video Card
G.Skill 4GB Ram | Western Digital 400GB HD
X-Fi Xtrememusic Sound Card
Antec P180B Case | Scythe Ninja HSF
CM Real Power Pro 650watt PSU
diduknowthat is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 11:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,437
Default

yea, raising the frequency raises temps quite linearly.
for instance, you've got a proc at 2.0ghz... and you raise to 2.4ghz.
you only took 1/5 of the original heat and added it... if that.
raising vcore raises temps a lot more though.
read up on it:
Overclocking 101 (Oc101)
taken from praetor's overclocking 101, that part is about voltage.
__________________

Core 2 Duo e6300 (2.71ghz o/ced)(Q6600 soon!)
Thermaltake Big Typhoon CPU cooler
DFI Infinity 975X motherboard
Radeon HD 4850 512mb (700mhz/2200mhz)
2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-800 4-4-4-12 (2.1v)
2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive
1x250gb Seagate 7200.9 storage drive
Windows Vista x64

Last edited by fade2green514; 04-24-2006 at 11:58 AM.
fade2green514 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 04-24-2006, 12:05 PM   #6 (permalink)
Administrator
 
apj101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Age: 26
Posts: 9,145
Default

Quote:
stick to a 350Mhz increase otherwise u could damage it by not giving it enough voltage!
You will hardly notice a 350 mhz/PR points increase, its the kind of number that is just on the edge of noticablity. Granted on a Amd chip a 300+mhz is a bigger deal that on intel.

Quote:
Theres no real way of saying what it could do, but it kills the warenty so you cant get a reaplcement.
like they'd ever know... please Mr newegg i dont OC i dont even know what that means... FSB what ?!?!

Quote:
is there any bad side effects in the future as long as it is still running at normal temps?
cpu melt down and burn out.
power issues resulting in failure of motherboard and/or psu
related failure of multiple components as a results of psu failure.
Loss and corruption of data

All these are risks... low ones... but risks none the less
apj101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 03:23 PM   #7 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
mrjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Age: 17
Posts: 2,348
Default

I OC'ed my CPU from 1,53GHz to 2,027GHz with an increase of about 2-4 degrees Celsius. That's almost a 500MHz OC and such a small difference in temperatures. Just make sure you blow out dust in your computer, I got almost a 10 degrees drop in CPU temperature when I blew out all the dust in my computer.
__________________
Main rig:
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3GHz | MSI P7N Zilent
2x2048Mb OCZ Titanium 800MHz DDR2
Samsung Spinpoint T166 320Gb SATAII
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 250Gb SATAII
Western Digital Caviar 500Gb SATAII
MSI NX8800GT OC 512Mb @ 660MHz/950MHz
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio | Antec Truepower Trio 550W
mrjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 05:11 PM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
fade2green514's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,437
Default

wow, 2,027GHZ???? damn i didnt know they went over 7GHz.
note: you mean MHz.
also, if you read cpu101 and oc101 then you should be good to go, just dont overvolt too much.
__________________

Core 2 Duo e6300 (2.71ghz o/ced)(Q6600 soon!)
Thermaltake Big Typhoon CPU cooler
DFI Infinity 975X motherboard
Radeon HD 4850 512mb (700mhz/2200mhz)
2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-800 4-4-4-12 (2.1v)
2x80gb WD 8mb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive
1x250gb Seagate 7200.9 storage drive
Windows Vista x64
fade2green514 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 06:07 PM   #9 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
mrjack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Age: 17
Posts: 2,348
Default

2,027GHz which is 2027MHz. My FSB is 175, it wouldn't boot at 185 which would have made Windows recognize it as a 2600+ and it wasn't stable at 180.
__________________
Main rig:
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3GHz | MSI P7N Zilent
2x2048Mb OCZ Titanium 800MHz DDR2
Samsung Spinpoint T166 320Gb SATAII
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 250Gb SATAII
Western Digital Caviar 500Gb SATAII
MSI NX8800GT OC 512Mb @ 660MHz/950MHz
Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio | Antec Truepower Trio 550W
mrjack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2006, 07:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Administrator
 
apj101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: London
Age: 26
Posts: 9,145
Default

Quote:
2,027GHz which is 2027MHz.
Not in most of the world
apj101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum