ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Hardware > Video Cards and Monitors

View Poll Results: wat do u prefer Nvidia or ATI
Nvidia 822 69.19%
ATI 366 30.81%
Voters: 1188. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-29-2008, 10:07 PM   #751 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 26,400
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by g25racer View Post
To me AMD and Nvidia go hand in hand. IDK, they just fit well together. I havent ever used an ATI but, nvidia just attracks my attention more. Just a personal preference.
Thats what I always thought as well, but then AMD goes and buys ATI, so who knows.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.83GHz
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
ATI HD 3870 GDDR4 @ (840/2332)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2-850
500GB SATAII HD w/16MB
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
11593
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 02-29-2008, 10:51 PM   #752 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
ThatGuy16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 5,046
Default

I have always like ATI's picture better, AMD however is lacking in the cpu market. So AMD bottlenecks their own graphics cards in a dual card settup
__________________
CPU: C2D E8400 @ 4Ghz 1.23v
HSF: Apogee GTX
MB: Gigabyte X38-DS4
Ram: 2x2GB G. Skill DDR2-1068
HDD: 320GB Seagate
PSU: OCZ GameXStream 700w
OS: Vista Home Premium 64bit
GFX: HD3870 @ 837/1152
LCD:
LG 22" L226WTQ

My Old 3DMark06: 20008 =(
ThatGuy16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 11:12 PM   #753 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
g25racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,583
Default

Price is an issue for me as im a teenager. Ya if i had thousand of dollars and wanted to show it off i would go for an intel but, I am anything but a fan of intel.
g25racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 11:25 PM   #754 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Kesava's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Australia
Age: 17
Posts: 2,979
Default

price is an issue for me, but i would still go nvidia.

if you cant afford an 8800gt then maybe you would get a hd3850 or 3870. but wait! you could get the 8800gs or 9600gt. which are equal. so nividia
__________________
formerly Kuzba
Cpu:Intel Q6600 2.4Ghz @ 3.4Ghz
Hsf:Zalman CNPS 9700 LED
Ram:Generic 2 Gb 800 Mhz
Gpu:XFX 8800 GT 512mb @ 700/1750/2000
Mobo:Gigabyte P31-DS3L
Case:Centurion 532
3dmark06:13518

MSN=kesava8@hotmail.com

Last edited by Kesava; 03-01-2008 at 01:31 AM.
Kesava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 11:40 PM   #755 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
g25racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,583
Default

Not me! I'd still rather stick with AMD and i dont think anything would change my mind.
__________________
CPU - AMD Athlon 64x2 5200+ @ 2.6ghz
Ram - 2GB Stock clock
HD - 320gb seagate & Samsung 750gb 32mb cache
GPU - XFX 8600GT XXX Zalman @ 680 or 700mhz
PSU - Ultra X-finity 600watt
OS - Vista Home Premium(32) & XP Pro and Vista
Audio - JVC 460watts
Control - Logitech G25 Wheel & Logitech Rumblepad 2
Games - GTR2 and LFS
-- Race Sim's for Life --
g25racer is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-08-2008, 11:54 PM   #756 (permalink)
sir
New Member
 
sir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Default

By far ATI graphics cards are better on laptops, and Nvidia graphics cards are better on desktops. GeForce cards i've had in my laptops have been so undersupported and never worked properly.
__________________
~ Windows XP, VISTA and Ubuntu - Best of all worlds ~
sir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 04:15 AM   #757 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
elitehacker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 19
Posts: 2,399
Default

Graphics on laptops are not designed to rival desktops anyway. The whole design of the laptop is for work on the road, so gaming is not very well accommodated in laptops, if you game on a laptop, then you have too much money to waste. And Intel and Nvidia all the way, the extra you spend on it is worth it, Intel CPUs perform better at stock and they can overclock much higher than any AMD CPUs and the same goes for the graphics side, the overclocking head room is quite big for Intel and Nvidia.
elitehacker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 07:36 PM   #758 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
g25racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elitehacker View Post
Graphics on laptops are not designed to rival desktops anyway. The whole design of the laptop is for work on the road, so gaming is not very well accommodated in laptops, if you game on a laptop, then you have too much money to waste. And Intel and Nvidia all the way, the extra you spend on it is worth it, Intel CPUs perform better at stock and they can overclock much higher than any AMD CPUs and the same goes for the graphics side, the overclocking head room is quite big for Intel and Nvidia.
Well Put! Makes sense but, i would still rather go with AMD. Like i said before if i had the money i would switch out my mobo and go buy a Q6600 but, thats not the case.
__________________
CPU - AMD Athlon 64x2 5200+ @ 2.6ghz
Ram - 2GB Stock clock
HD - 320gb seagate & Samsung 750gb 32mb cache
GPU - XFX 8600GT XXX Zalman @ 680 or 700mhz
PSU - Ultra X-finity 600watt
OS - Vista Home Premium(32) & XP Pro and Vista
Audio - JVC 460watts
Control - Logitech G25 Wheel & Logitech Rumblepad 2
Games - GTR2 and LFS
-- Race Sim's for Life --
g25racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2008, 08:08 PM   #759 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Archangel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Netherlands
Age: 21
Posts: 7,834
Default

at the moment I liem Ati better. I find it stupid that you have to geta 600Watt powersupply to run a grafic's card, and a 1kW one for SLI for example. sorry, but imo grafic's cards are going in the complete wrong direction there. I picked a 3870 over the 8800gt(s) because of the lower power consumption, and I definately dont regret making that choice.
__________________
God's busy, can I hellp you?


Newton is dead, Einstein is dead, I don't feel very well either

Xfire - Mirrari
Intel Q6600 ( @3.6GHz)
Asus Triton 79 Amazing 549/3200
4x 1Gb Corsair XMS2 DDR800 ( @ 960MHz )
Asus Maximus Formula
Asus & Sapphire HD3870 512Mb
Logitech MX Revolution mouse, G-15 keyboard, Saitek X-45 AeroEngine II case
Corsair HX620W PSU
Archangel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2008, 10:43 PM   #760 (permalink)
banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 75
Default

Well. Like most of the time I've been into computers, it's been nVidia, but now that I have researched more I've realized that ATI is better. This is because every ATI card that has similar to any nVidia card specs is much cheaper. I'm not really sure how good ATI is because I've never used it, but I've herd it's good. Another thing is that now ATI came out with the best video card in the world. It is the 3870 x2. It much better than the nVidia 8800Ultra, and still it is like $300 cheaper. That's why I now prefer ATI more. Imagine having 3870 x2 quad-crossfire (crossfire is the same thing as nVidia's SLI, but for ATI). The graphics would make your eyes bleed.
Interest is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ati, nvidia

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum