ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Desktop Computers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-04-2006, 04:17 AM   #1 (permalink)
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
Default x2 3800 vs. 4200

is there really a big difference b/w these two or is it not worth the 50 some odd dollars?
bigpimp101 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-04-2006, 04:19 AM   #2 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 26,374
Default

Most people would say no, but if you can afford it then you might as well get it.

BTW, please dont double post.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.83GHz
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
ATI HD 3870 GDDR4 @ (840/2332)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2-850
500GB SATAII HD w/16MB
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
11593
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2006, 05:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
Lax
Moderator
 
Lax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Snow country
Age: 21
Posts: 2,240
Default

YOU won't be able to notice the difference. So if you wanna save 50$ then go ahead and do it, if you wanna upgrade, do that too.
__________________
He who controls the present controls the past.
He who controls the past, controls the future.
Lax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2006, 03:47 PM   #4 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
YEA_PC_PHONICS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DFW, Texas
Age: 18
Posts: 458
Default

Ya the only real dif is the core because thay are both 2.0 so its really just can you afford it?
__________________
i must not be pushing my overclock hard enough, my computer hasn't crashed in 3 days

RIP DIMEBAG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Encore4More View Post
obviously 2 7900GTs over 1 7950GTX
think about it... 2 7900GTs:
7900+7900=15800
that is obviously a much higher number than 7950...
YEA_PC_PHONICS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2006, 04:05 PM   #5 (permalink)
banned
 
Dr Studly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hales Corners Wisconson
Age: 17
Posts: 2,435
Default

...the 4200 is 200MHz faster...
Dr Studly is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 05-05-2006, 03:38 AM   #6 (permalink)
banned
 
AMD gs player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: embrun ontario
Age: 18
Posts: 475
Default

the 4200 has more cache and a higher fsb i think corect me if im wrong
AMD gs player is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 03:44 AM   #7 (permalink)
banned
 
Dr Studly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hales Corners Wisconson
Age: 17
Posts: 2,435
Default

no
it doesn't, the 4200+ can be clocked 200MHz higher than the 3800+ can be clocked.. thats the only difference
Dr Studly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 03:45 AM   #8 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
holyjunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Age: 17
Posts: 1,622
Default

isn't the 4200 better in gaming if a game only uses single core? cause i heard the 3800 stinks as far as it goes in single core gaming
__________________
pentium 4 1.5GHz
512mb pc133
19inch crt monitor
Radeon 9200se
X-Fi Extreme Music
LOGITECH Z-5300E!!
*family pc, hope to get mine in a year or so.
holyjunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2006, 03:48 AM   #9 (permalink)
banned
 
AMD gs player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: embrun ontario
Age: 18
Posts: 475
Default

no i havent herd that all i have herd is that dual core prossesors run a litle slower on single core games but it is like that with all the dual core
AMD gs player is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:45 AM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum