View Single Post
Old 09-25-2006, 09:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
PC eye
banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 21,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrangleHold View Post
As fas as I know thats for Dual processors not dual cores
Read it carefully now.
Windows XP SP2 Dual Core Performance FixPosted by: Chris_Tom on Friday, October 07, 2005 - 10:35 AM
Microsoft has released a hotfix to improve performance on dual core systems. It fixes a possible decrease in performance during demand based switching. Cool 'n Quiet must be enabled for the fix to work, and Microsoft will only send you the hot fix if you have been experiencing the problem. The issue is how do you know if you are or not? AMD told me this can have an impact on some games although I've not heard of any problems, and my main gaming system is an Athlon 64 X2 3800+ at the moment. Here are some additional details. Possible decrease in performance during demand-based switching
Demand-based switching refers to the changing of ACPI processor performance states in response to system workloads. For example, demand-based switching can change voltage and frequency in response to system workloads. Windows XP processor power management implements demand-based switching through the Adaptive processor throttling policy. The Adaptive processor throttling policy dynamically and automatically adjusts the processor current performance state in response to the computers CPU use. The Adaptive processor throttling policy works without user intervention.

If you run Windows XP on a computer that has multiple processors, single-threaded workloads may move across available CPUs. This migration behavior is a natural artifact of how Windows schedules work across available CPU resources. However, if a computer is running with the Adaptive processor throttling policy, this thread migration may cause problems. For example, the Windows kernel power manager may not be able to correctly calculate the optimal target performance state for the processor. This problem occurs because the individual logical or physical processor core may appear to be less busy than the processor package actually is. On performance benchmarks that use single-threaded workloads, this artifact may become evident in the following ways:
• Decreased performance
• A high degree of variance between successive runs of the same benchmark tests
The hotfix that is described in this article includes changes to the kernel power manager. These changes make it possible to track CPU use across the processor package. This tracking helps calculate an increased target performance state.

Note This solution favors performance gains over power savings. Although benchmark performance scores may improve, battery life could be negatively affected. Therefore, this kernel policy change must be enabled in the registry to allow for maximum flexibility.

I would be interested to know if this actually effected anyone out there.

http://www.amdzone.com/modules.php?o...rder=0&thold=0

This is only one original reference to using the same hotfix for dual cored models seen in late 2005. http://support.microsoft.com/?id=896256
PC eye is offline   Reply With Quote