|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: The Intel or the AMD (only from my two options in this post) | |||
| Intel (what I'm currently leaning to) |
|
4 | 44.44% |
| AMD (impressive, but no dual core and their dual core is expensive) |
|
5 | 55.56% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8
|
I want to get a good cpu under 300 dollars.
Currently I am trying to decide between: AMD athlon 64 3000+ with 2000mhz bus speed (single core) priced at around $130 Intel Pentium D (dual core) 2.66 ghz with 533 mhz bus speed priced at around $150 I THINK that I would like a dual core cpu and Intel's Pentium D is a really good price for a dual core cpu. But AMD has a much higher performance than Intel (from what I know) and I don't know If the Single core cheaper amd can outperform the DUAL CORE Intel. Also, the Intel has a much slower bus speed. I don't know if AMD has a higher performance gain with a 2000 mhz bus speed, even though it is single core. Please help me out here, which one should I get (both these prices are from www.tigerdirect.com) Thanks a lot! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
banned
![]() Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Hales Corners Wisconson
Age: 17
Posts: 2,435
|
neither will play the newest games well... except the pentium D will be able to play some of them such as Quake 4, COD2, and Oblibion, and it will be able to play future multi-threaded games... which is what the Pentium D has over the Athlon 3000+... and the 3000+ doesn't have anything over the PD... (except for single threaded games, but as i said, it won't be able to play the latest games well n e way...)
Last edited by Dr Studly; 05-08-2006 at 05:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Nor Cal
Age: 17
Posts: 6,073
|
Quote:
__________________
RIP Mom 9/17/55-02/22/08. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Croatia
Age: 19
Posts: 1,977
|
Well I have no problems playing F.E.A.R. on maximum settings with AA 2X, AF 16X without soft shadows, I never get below 30 fps, avarage ~60, max ~170
Athlon 64 3000+ can handle every game if you have a good GPU that is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
New Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 8
|
Firstly, Thanks all for your responses! Also, the Intel board I'm planning to get can support ddr2 ram. Will that yield a noticably greater performance in terms of frames per second in a game?
Last edited by solarwind; 05-08-2006 at 05:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 39
|
it should..hell its DDR2...your best bet, wait for AM2 processors to come out so AMD uses DDR2, then get an AMD system, itll blow intel out of the water
__________________
AMD Athlon XP 3200+ 1gb PC2700 Patriot 2-3-3-6, 9600XT 256mb, Asus A7N8X-E Deluxe, Creative Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Hauppauge WINTV-GO-PLUS IDE Western Digital 200gig (with vantec Vortex crossflow cooler) IDE Seagate 60gig, SATA Maxtor 80gig iomega cd-rw/dvd-rom, Chieftec Matrix Case 17" Dell P780 Flat CRT, 17" Sony Flat CRT, Creative Gigaworks S750 7.1 [ISM] <EliteEmerz> |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Croatia
Age: 19
Posts: 1,977
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Croatia
Age: 19
Posts: 1,977
|
Quote:
You can find a X2 3800+ for around $300, you said that's your budget. Last edited by Filip; 05-08-2006 at 03:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|