|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 217
|
Which one's better the:
Quad NVIDIA PCI Express x16 high-performance graphics 4 x 512MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory Quad DVI and S-Video outputs with quad-display support* Full DirectX® 9.0 and OpenGL® 2.0 graphics compatibility NVIDIA® SLI-Enabled or Dual NVIDIA® PCI Express x16 high-performance graphics Up to 2 x 512MB GDDR3 dedicated video memory* DVI, VGA, and S-Video outputs with dual-display support Dual DVI and S-Video outputs with dual-display support* Full DirectX® 9.0 and OpenGL® 2.0 graphics compatibility NVIDIA® SLI-Enabled* what are the downs and ups in each? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 26
Posts: 11,802
|
I'd say don't go with the quad, to me it just doesn't make sense. Hell, going with SLI in general doesn't make sense to me, it's cheaper and better performing to buy 1 of the next generations cards then to get 2 of the current generations cards.
__________________
You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in command here. www.userfriendly.org |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 16
Posts: 2,844
|
Take a look at this article: http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...-quad-sli.html
__________________
DFI Lanparty UT nF4 SLI DR Athlon 64 3500+ Venice 1 Gig OCZ VX DDR500 DDR BFG GeForce 7800GT 160 Gig SATA HDD CD-RW DVD-ROM Antec NeoPower 480 Thermaltake Tsunami |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Finland
Age: 18
Posts: 2,595
|
Don't get the Quad SLi, there has been alot of trouble when using it. Certain games didn't start, certain games were performing worse than the usual SLi even on low settings.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 3.45GHz | MSI P7N Zilent
2x2048Mb OCZ Titanium 800MHz DDR2 Western Digital Caviar 160Gb SATAII Samsung Spinpoint F1 320Gb SATAII Western Digital Caviar 500Gb SATAII Samsung Spinpoint F1 750Gb SATAII MSI NX8800GT OC 512Mb Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio Antec Truepower Trio 550W Windows Vista Ultimate 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 20
Posts: 3,651
|
hmm what cards are they though?
i'd say just get regular SLI tho, quad seems overpriced and overrated. Quote:
loldual 7900gtx's would be to die for! not really but you get the point.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3ghz HD 4850 512mb (750/2350mhz) 2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835 (5-4-4-10) 2x320gb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive 250gb sata2 storage drive 13,574 - 3dmark06 score Last edited by fade2green514; 05-09-2006 at 08:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Goffstown, NH
Age: 21
Posts: 28,949
|
Your question is kind of a no-brainer... "whats better, 4 GPU's or 2?"
As others have said, the Quad SLI is more of a waste, and has problems at times.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.1GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 ATI 4870 X2 2GB GDDR5 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2 960 300GB Raptor // 2x 750GB Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 22605 www.photosbygeoff.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Silver Member
![]() Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 217
|
that confused kinda of alot hahaha
Ok i'll make my question more clearer, Im trying to buy an ALX from alienware.. ethier the quad sli or regular 7900 GTX Dual ALX.. which one is better? the quad cost more, but i dont even know if the quad is GTX, it does say GPU. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Platinum Member
![]() Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bismarck, ND
Age: 21
Posts: 752
|
Quote:
Praetor made it clear (if you read the article) that one current generation card will be better and more cost effective than 2 or more cards... most people who want 2 or more video cards need the power and already have what they want picked out... i was trying to say that unless you really need them... don't get them... even for gaming, one of the top-end cards will suffice... atleast for now, then you can always upgrade later on... you have to realize that the: cost of those cards + the fact that before you buy them, they are out of date = waste of money... i guess if it's worth it to you to buy 4X the outdated material, go for it... for simplicity's sake... what are you using the computer for? if you tell us we can recommend a cheaper setup i'm sure... (by the way - i deleted my first post because i believe it wasn't needed anymore...) Last edited by goosy22; 05-09-2006 at 11:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|