|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lansing, MI.
Posts: 35
|
I'm wondering if the new macbook pro with the 2.16 GHZ core duo would be faster then my current cpu which is AMD Athlon 64 x2 4400+. Someone that is a huge mac fan said it'd blow my cpu out of the water and I guess I just find that difficult to believe, then again, I could be wrong. Thanks.
__________________
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ MOBO: Asus nForce4 Memory: Corsair 1GB DDR400 Vid Card: eVGA GeForce 7800 GT Hard Drives: 2 36GB 10,000 rpm WD Raptors in a RAID 300GB Maxtor 7,200 rpm Monitors: 2 20.1" Wide Aspect Dell 2005fsp http://www.infinitemethod.com/images/dualmonitors.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
VIP Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lewisville, TX
Age: 20
Posts: 6,875
|
Are we comparing processors alone, or the entire computer vs. his Mac? Because this is REALLY an Intel vs. AMD topic if you're just comparing processors. However, if you mean the entire system...it's Mac vs. PC. Tough cookie.
EDIT: have a look here. http://www.gamepc.com/labs/print_con...ookie%5Ftest=1 it appears that the Duo Core is pretty evenly matches...hard to tell who is better here. depends on other hardware.
__________________
My Computer I choose to believe what I was programmed to believe. Can I eat your brain? FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 44358 Last edited by 4W4K3; 05-15-2006 at 05:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,623
|
Quote:
generally the core duo is better (if they both have the same frequency) because it has more cache, but the 4400+ has plenty of cache, and a slightly higher frequency, so i'd go with the 4400+... basically you won't see any real performance differences.
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3ghz HD 4850 512mb (750/2350mhz) 2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835 (5-4-4-10) 2x80gb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive 250gb sata2 storage drive 13,574 - 3dmark06 score |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 20
Posts: 27,082
|
The X2 would be better overall, and especially at gaming. But the Core Duo us also very nice, however it's not as good as the 4400+ in most apps/games.
__________________
Desktop // Laptop Core 2 Quad Q9550 @ 4.0GHz // Core 2 Duo P8400 2.26GHz Asus Rampage Formula X48 // Intel PM45 ATI 4870X2 2GB GDDR5 // 512MB GDDR3 9800M GTS 4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2 940 // 4GB DDR3 800 750GB SATAII w/32MB // 200GB SATAII 7200RPM Creative SB X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty SilverStone 750W +12V@60A 3DMark06: 21391 // 9179 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Bronze Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lansing, MI.
Posts: 35
|
Thanks for the input fellas. I'm extremely happy with my AMD and theres a good chance I'll never stray away from AMD.
__________________
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ MOBO: Asus nForce4 Memory: Corsair 1GB DDR400 Vid Card: eVGA GeForce 7800 GT Hard Drives: 2 36GB 10,000 rpm WD Raptors in a RAID 300GB Maxtor 7,200 rpm Monitors: 2 20.1" Wide Aspect Dell 2005fsp http://www.infinitemethod.com/images/dualmonitors.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Diamond Member
![]() Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: buffalo ny
Age: 19
Posts: 3,623
|
yea plus a core duo normally wouldn't be paired with a 7800gt lol
ill stray away from AMD if the performance/ price is better lol
__________________
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3ghz HD 4850 512mb (750/2350mhz) 2x2gb G.Skill ddr2-835 (5-4-4-10) 2x80gb sata2 in RAID 0 system drive 250gb sata2 storage drive 13,574 - 3dmark06 score |
|
|
|