ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Software > Operating Systems

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-14-2004, 08:01 PM   #11 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Verrona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Age: 21
Posts: 358
Default

I said Windows was created on Linux workservers... not running on them.

The run C to program windows!!!
__________________
Regards,

Verrona

--
How to ask a question.
Verrona is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-14-2004, 09:18 PM   #12 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 24
Posts: 19,943
Default

Quote:
I said Windows was created on Linux workservers... not running on them.
The run C to program windows!!!
1. Lets get some actual documented proof of this ... as a general rule, when making wild (and extremely board) comments like that, your credibility is severely suspect unless some reputable and documented proof is provided. You and i both know this so lets separate fact from speculation

2. Not all of Windows is C code and as such, by direct inference, Windows could not have been natively compiled by the Linux C compiler.

3. A course in compilers will teach you that the role of a compiler is to take some source, say
PHP Code:
#include <stdio.h>
int main(void){
    
printf ("This is C code of some sort\n");
    return
0;
}
And translate it to work on both (a) the present hardware platform (say IA32) and (b) the operating environment (say W32 or linux) cuz you see, C-compilers, unlike platform independent ones such as the Java compiler, write and optimize the source code for a given platform (stuff like WINE and VirtualPC are anomalous conditions as far as compilers are concerned). What does this mean? If it compiles under a given operating system and hardware platform, then it will run under that platform. Naturally this is what Cromwell has been saying (as well as my earlier post to a much less focused degree).

4. Again, i reiterate that its somewhat important to provide either proof or some degree of structured logic or reasoning behind such broad (and evidently/apprently) inconsistent claims.
__________________
ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, Q6600@3.7 / ASUS P5ND, E6400@3.8
4GB OCz Platinum XTC 8500 / 4GB CorsairXMS2 6400
5x500GB Seagate 7200.10 / 2x500 Seagate 7200.10
OCz 8800GTX 768MB @ 630/800 / 2x Galaxy 8800GT SLI
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2004, 09:19 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cromewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 24
Posts: 10,015
Default

Quote:
I said Windows was created on Linux workservers... not running on them.
Ok first, I know Windows is written in C/C++. That is why a new buffer overrun virus/minor irritant seems to come out weekly. Linux was written in C/C++ as well, so then I could say the new Linux distros are created on a Windows machine but I'd be wrong.

Now I said Windows was not created on a Linux station because the Linux compilers create a program that will run on a Unix based system. Just like a W32 C/C++ compiler will create a W32 program not a Unix executable.
__________________

You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here.

I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D:
www.ctrlaltdel-online.com
www.userfriendly.org
Cromewell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2004, 09:23 PM   #14 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Praetor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 24
Posts: 19,943
Default

Quote:
Ok first, I know Windows is written in C/C++. That is why a new buffer overrun virus/minor irritant seems to come out weekly
LOL

Quote:
Linux was written in C/C++ as well, so then I could say the new Linux distros are created on a Windows machine but I'd be wrong.
But but but but....

Quote:
Now I said Windows was not created on a Linux station because the Linux compilers create a program that will run on a Unix based system. Just like a W32 C/C++ compiler will create a W32 program not a Unix executable.
I think hes getting confused over the link between source and compilation ... source is simply text and as such is platform independent (i.e., if you had the source for windows as C/C++ you prolly could compile it under linux ... of course not all of it is C/C++ and the fact that you dont have the source present themselves as minor problems). So essentially, just because the source is in C/C++ doesnt mean the final compilation is linux based. :rollseyes:
__________________
ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, Q6600@3.7 / ASUS P5ND, E6400@3.8
4GB OCz Platinum XTC 8500 / 4GB CorsairXMS2 6400
5x500GB Seagate 7200.10 / 2x500 Seagate 7200.10
OCz 8800GTX 768MB @ 630/800 / 2x Galaxy 8800GT SLI
Praetor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2004, 09:28 PM   #15 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Lorand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bucharest
Age: 41
Posts: 3,042
Default

Have a look on the Windows98 source code and everything will be crystal clear: http://www.siliconglen.com/jokes/windows.html
Lorand is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 12-14-2004, 10:03 PM   #16 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Cromewell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Canada
Age: 24
Posts: 10,015
Default

Quote:
I think hes getting confused over the link between source and compilation ... source is simply text and as such is platform independent (i.e., if you had the source for windows as C/C++ you prolly could compile it under linux ... of course not all of it is C/C++ and the fact that you dont have the source present themselves as minor problems). So essentially, just because the source is in C/C++ doesnt mean the final compilation is linux based. :rollseyes:
I know that too but only a dingus would write the source on a linux machine then transfer it to compile
__________________

You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you with 'til ya understand who's in ruttin' command here.

I must plug a couple comics because they are good :D:
www.ctrlaltdel-online.com
www.userfriendly.org
Cromewell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2004, 11:13 PM   #17 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
geranimo://'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Age: 20
Posts: 345
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorand
Have a look on the Windows98 source code and everything will be crystal clear: http://www.siliconglen.com/jokes/windows.html
iight, im a total n00b at this, but that isnt serious is it?

"if (still_not_crashed)"
geranimo:// is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2004, 11:18 PM   #18 (permalink)
VIP Member
 
Lorand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Bucharest
Age: 41
Posts: 3,042
Default

My favorite is this:
Code:
if (system_ok())
crash(to_dos_prompt);
Lorand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2004, 11:36 PM   #19 (permalink)
SFR
SUPER MODERATOR
 
SFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, USA
Age: 24
Posts: 3,909
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geranimo://
iight, im a total n00b at this, but that isnt serious is it?

"if (still_not_crashed)"
lol


are you serious?
__________________
The real danger is not that computers will begin to think like men,
but that men will begin to think like computers.
~Sydney J. Harris

I haven't lost my mind; I have a tape back-up somewhere.

What the world needs is more geniuses with humility, there are so few of us left.
~Oscar Levant

Relax, its only Ones and Zeros
SFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2004, 10:24 AM   #20 (permalink)
Gold Member
 
Verrona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Age: 21
Posts: 358
Default

K i'll let this drop .... for now until i find evidence.
__________________
Regards,

Verrona

--
How to ask a question.
Verrona is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:23 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum