ComputerForum.com ComputerForum.com  
TigerDirect
 
Go Back   Computer Forum > Computer Systems > Desktop Computers

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-20-2006, 02:50 AM   #11 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 18
Posts: 588
Default

ok i have decided to not get conroe an buy an AMD when the orice cut comes in..... ok i need it all, this comp will be for gaming, surfing, and basixc tasks. I want a nice video card, and 2 ahrddrives 1 10000rpm and one bigger 7200 (160g or so), i ahve a case and would like suggestions on a nice system that will somewhat not cause me greif.
thanks
dark_legacy2006 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-20-2006, 02:54 AM   #12 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 18
Posts: 588
Default

also im not sure igf agp (type of video card i want) has a pc tuner, and im not quite sure how they work but id like to know if you basically hook the comp to tv and can record off the tv to comp if os i want one
dark_legacy2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 02:54 AM   #13 (permalink)
SC7
Platinum Member
 
SC7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 17
Posts: 757
Default

Well, here's a suggestion, wait, and see what happens with the price cuts. Then look for benchmarks, and see if Conroe is a better bang for the buck, or AMD, always look for what's a better proc for your dollar.
__________________
My Rig
Pentium 4 2.8 GHz Northwood
Intel 845GVSR Motherboard
1 GB PC 3200 DDR
BFG Tech FX5500OC 256 Mb PCI Edition
160 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
60 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
Sony DVD-Rom/CD-RW Drive
Dynex DVD+-R/RW Dual Layer Drive
Nice MAG Innovision 17" LCD Flat Panel Monitor.
SC7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 02:58 AM   #14 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 18
Posts: 588
Default

AMD ATHLON 64 X2 4400+ Toledo 939 Dual Core CPU
that sounds like a great processor, but just a few questions
1. does dual core mean 2 processors in one?
2. how fast will this run? ghz
3. fsb, what exactly does it do......
thanks
dark_legacy2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 03:06 AM   #15 (permalink)
SC7
Platinum Member
 
SC7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 17
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dark_legacy2006
1. does dual core mean 2 processors in one?
Dual core means 2 processing cores/dies on one chip. This is just like two processors because the die is really where data is processed.

Quote:
2. how fast will this run? ghz
It runs at 2.2 GHz, from the research I've done. Don't let this fool you, GHz aren't everything. This is about the equivalent of a dual core 3.4 GHz Pentium 4. It performs a lot more operations per clock cycle.

Quote:
3. fsb, what exactly does it do......
FSB stands for Front Side Bus, and is a measurement of how fast the processor communicates with the chipset and ram. The more, the better. AMD does this well, Intel's FSB sometimes bottlenecks RAM performance, I like AMD's integrated memory controller, kind of, except the architecture really needs to be redesigned for every new memory type.

Hope this helps, any more questions, please feel free to ask, I'll help as much as I can.
__________________
My Rig
Pentium 4 2.8 GHz Northwood
Intel 845GVSR Motherboard
1 GB PC 3200 DDR
BFG Tech FX5500OC 256 Mb PCI Edition
160 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
60 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
Sony DVD-Rom/CD-RW Drive
Dynex DVD+-R/RW Dual Layer Drive
Nice MAG Innovision 17" LCD Flat Panel Monitor.
SC7 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 07-20-2006, 03:11 AM   #16 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 18
Posts: 588
Default

ok thanks alot, your a lot of help..... but how can i 2.2 matcgha 3.4 dual core?
dark_legacy2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 03:17 AM   #17 (permalink)
SC7
Platinum Member
 
SC7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 17
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dark_legacy2006
ok thanks alot, your a lot of help..... but how can i 2.2 matcgha 3.4 dual core?
Well, there are a lot of other factors. For one, it has that faster FSB we talked about, second, it has a lot more level one cache, third, it performs more operations per clock cycle, and has a better pipeline system. It's not better at everything, it beats that 3.4 in more than the 3.4 beats it, but there are areas where the worse of the two will pull out a victory. Remember, clock speed is not so important, that's why the new conroes are going lower clocks, they're focusing more on Operations per clock cycle, better pipelines, and the like. MHz was just a marketing tactic Intel used because they're specifically designed Netburst architecture could reach high speeds with low efficiency (heat, and OPC), just so they'd have good looking numbers, I'm glad Otelini and crew moved away from that philosohy.
__________________
My Rig
Pentium 4 2.8 GHz Northwood
Intel 845GVSR Motherboard
1 GB PC 3200 DDR
BFG Tech FX5500OC 256 Mb PCI Edition
160 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
60 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
Sony DVD-Rom/CD-RW Drive
Dynex DVD+-R/RW Dual Layer Drive
Nice MAG Innovision 17" LCD Flat Panel Monitor.
SC7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 03:21 AM   #18 (permalink)
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canada
Age: 18
Posts: 588
Default

ok, i think i kinda understand...... this might be kind of a hard questikon but how is ghz determined then, also will that 2.2 be able to do it all? mulit task, game, and load quickly?
dark_legacy2006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 03:48 AM   #19 (permalink)
Diamond Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Concord, NH
Age: 19
Posts: 26,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SC7
Well, there are a lot of other factors. For one, it has that faster FSB we talked about, second, it has a lot more level one cache, third, it performs more operations per clock cycle, and has a better pipeline system. It's not better at everything, it beats that 3.4 in more than the 3.4 beats it, but there are areas where the worse of the two will pull out a victory. Remember, clock speed is not so important, that's why the new conroes are going lower clocks, they're focusing more on Operations per clock cycle, better pipelines, and the like. MHz was just a marketing tactic Intel used because they're specifically designed Netburst architecture could reach high speeds with low efficiency (heat, and OPC), just so they'd have good looking numbers, I'm glad Otelini and crew moved away from that philosohy.
You can't truly compare a 2.2Ghz X2 to a 3.4Ghz P4, since they each perform better in certain tasks then others.

Also, the X2 doesn't have an FSB, they use HTT.

You're right about the clock speeds not meaning everything, since it's very easy to see in Intels Core architecture.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dark_legacy2006
ok, i think i kinda understand...... this might be kind of a hard questikon but how is ghz determined then, also will that 2.2 be able to do it all? mulit task, game, and load quickly?
I can't say for sure how Ghz is determinded, but the rated speed they give you is just the frequency at which it transmits data (I believe). There are many other factors to consider now, and clock speed has become virtually unusuable for comparing different types of processors.
__________________
Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.83GHz
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
ATI HD 3870 GDDR4 @ (840/2332)
4GB (2x 2GB) DDR2-850
500GB SATAII HD w/16MB
SilverStone 750W +12V@60A
3DMark06:
11593
[-0MEGA-] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2006, 05:30 AM   #20 (permalink)
SC7
Platinum Member
 
SC7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 17
Posts: 757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by [-0MEGA-]
You can't truly compare a 2.2Ghz X2 to a 3.4Ghz P4, since they each perform better in certain tasks then others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC7
It's not better at everything, it beats that 3.4 in more than the 3.4 beats it, but there are areas where the worse of the two will pull out a victory.
Not real sure on HTT exactly, time for me to do some research.
__________________
My Rig
Pentium 4 2.8 GHz Northwood
Intel 845GVSR Motherboard
1 GB PC 3200 DDR
BFG Tech FX5500OC 256 Mb PCI Edition
160 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
60 GB WD Caviar SE (8 Mb cache) Edition
Sony DVD-Rom/CD-RW Drive
Dynex DVD+-R/RW Dual Layer Drive
Nice MAG Innovision 17" LCD Flat Panel Monitor.
SC7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help with my first ever build computer Newbii Desktop Computers 5 06-29-2006 02:30 PM
I have 5G's and I need to build a new computer ch1t0wn Desktop Computers 31 06-01-2006 05:47 AM
pLeAsE hElP Me BuIlD mY gAmInG CoMPuTeR? striker Desktop Computers 73 04-19-2006 03:32 AM
First computer build Skullbasher Desktop Computers 4 12-02-2005 03:40 AM
First Computer Build Thoughts lancer player Desktop Computers 13 03-28-2005 03:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2002-2007 Computer Forum and Web Design Forum